Peer review and implications Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Peer review

A

Before publication, all aspects of the investigation are scrutinised by experts (‘peers’) in the field

These experts should be objective and unknown to the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 3 aims of a peer review

A

Funding
Validate Research
Suggest Amendments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Allocate funding (peer review)

A

Independent peer evaluation also takes place to decide whether or not to award funding for a proposed research project. This may be co-ordinated by government-run funding organisations

e.g Medical research council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Validate research (peer review)

A

All elements of research are assessed for quality and accuracy; the formulation of hypotheses , methodology chosen, the statistical test used and the conclusions drawn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Suggesting amendments (peer review)

A

Reviewers may suggest minor revisions of of the work and thereby improve the report.

In extreme circumstances, they may conclude that the work is inappropriate for publication and should be withdrawn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 issues with peer review

A

Anonymity
Publication bias
Burying Ground-breaking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain why anonymity is an issue when peer reviewing

A

Anonymity may be used to criticise rival research

A minority of reviewers may use their anonymous status to criticise rival research

Often there is competition for limited research funding so this may be an issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain why publication bias is an issue when peer reviewing

A

There is a tendency for editors of journals that want to publish ‘headline-grabbing’ findings

This means that the research that does not meet this criterion is ignored - file drawer problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain why burying ground-breaking research is an issue when peer reviewing

A

Reviewers may be much more critical of research that contradicts their own view

Peer review may slow down the rate of change within scientific disciplines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What 3 examples of there in psychology is impacting the economy

A

Role of the father
Medical treatments
The nudge unit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the role of the father impact the economy

A

Research has suggested that father may have more of a secondary role than primary role. This may put pressure on women to take a bigger role in the nurturing of a child (makes them feel guilty when going back to work after birth)

However father are increasingly staying at home when their child is born and therefore contribute less to the economy - allowing mothers to go back to work which will contribute to the economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EXTRA: maternal deprivation an example for improving economy

A

Bowlby (critical period) Ainsworth (attachment style) Rutter (romanian orphans) demonstrate intellectual, emotionnal and physical development can be negativey affected by deprivation early in child’s life

Improves economy as these adults are likely to be more productive adults, better adjusted to demands of adult life, less likely to need costly mental health support as adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly