peer interactions + moral reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

timeline of peer interactions

A
  • infancy: look, vocalize, cry
  • 1-2 yr: interact, pretend play
  • 3 yr: more coordinated play, role taking
  • 6 yr: imaginative play
  • 7 yr: same gender preference
  • 11 yr: emotional support
  • 13+ yr: cross gender friendships
  • peer preference over adult preference from 2.5 yrs and increases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

socialising role of peers

A
  • model behaviours
  • reinforce behaviours
  • setting benchmarks for comparison
  • peer acceptance influences happiness/behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

sociometric techniques

A

used to categorize children according to popularity

-put 3 children into one category etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

factors affecting peer status

A
  • temperament
  • past experiences
  • physical appearance
  • social skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

social information processing study

A
  • normal and aggressive rejected children watched video of social interactions involving peer group entry and provocation
  • asked questions relating to social info processing model
  • child assessed on peer group and also were provoked
  • average child: scored well, 97% time in solitary activity + remainder in positive peer play
  • aggressive rejected child: scored badly, 48% solitary and rest in antisocial interaction. responded to provocation with anger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

parents helping with peer acceptance

A
  • being first people to interact with child
  • being role model
  • building up confidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

teacher promotion of peer acceptance

A
  • asking positively toned questions
  • offering useful suggestions
  • making supportive statements
  • children improved on sociometric measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

moral reasoning

A

=judgements of justice, rights, how people ought to relate to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

moral systems

A

=interlocking values/norms that work together –> make social life possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what part of the brain does moral reasoning involve?

A

hypothalamic-limbic system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

empathy

A

=feeling as another does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

sympathy

A

=feeling for another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

emotional contagion

A

=tendency to catch emotions e.g. babies cry when another does
-pupillary contagion in adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

mimicry

A

=synchronise expressions e.g. neonates mimic facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

development of concern for others

A
  • longitudinal study, children ages 11-12 months, over a year transitioned from being upset when someone else showed distress to engaging in prosocial behaviours to comfort them at 15 months
  • 18 month old show concern for stranger but no emotion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

development of moral reasoning

A

piaget:
-4-5 yrs- premoral judgement- don’t understand rules
-5-10 yrs- moral realism- rules cannot be changed
-10+ yrs- moral subjectivism- rules can be changed and intentions influence
kohlberg:
-preconventional- what is seen as right is obedience to authorities
-conventional- good behaviour is doing what is expected by people close to you
-postconventional- right behaviour and rules are in the best interest of the group (reached by 20yrs)

17
Q

criticisms of kohlberg’s theory

A
  • only tested females
  • westernised
  • children know the distinction between moral and social conventions early on
18
Q

kruger

A

7-10 yr girls in peer condition were better at moral reasoning than on their own