Paul's Disputed Letters Flashcards
Deutero-Pauline Letters
2 Thessalonians, Colossians and Ephesians are less disputed letters
Deutero
second or secondary
“Pastoral Epistles”
1 & 2 Timothy and Titus are even more disputed
Pastoral
related with Church ministry/Church community
Pseudonymity
Creating new works in the name of a well-known but deceased personage is called pseudonymity
Common ancient practice in Greek philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Alexander the Great) and Jewish tradition (Book of Deuteronomy ascribed to Moses).
The Problem of Pseudonymity
- To some modern readers, the notion that unknown Christians write in Paul’s name is ethically acceptable
- This practice of creating new works in the name of a well-known but deceased personage is called pseudonymity
- Intending to honour an esteemed figure of the past rather than necessarily to deceive the reading public, both Jews and Christians produced a large body of pseudonymous literature ascribed to such revered biblical figures as Daniel, Enoch, Moses, Isaiah and Ezra
- Pseudonymous works were written long after a figure’s death, not during his life. So the first appearance in the 90s of a letter by Paul in Thessalonica should deceive no one
- From about 80-150 CE, numerous works - Gospels, apostolic Acts, letters and apocalypses - became associated with the names Peter, John, James and Paul. - Some of these pseudonymous books were viewed as “apostolic” in content even though today we doubt their apostolic authorship
Historical Context of 2 Thessalonians
Author: Scholars are sharply divided on whether Paul wrote 2 Thessalonians, or if one of his unidentifiable followers after his death
Audience: Most hold that the letter went to the Church at Thessalonica; a few hold it authentic doubt about the destination
Date: If by Paul, it would have been written shortly after 1 Thessalonians, about 51 or 52, if pseudonymous, probably in the 90s
Unity and Integrity: maintained almost by all
Purpose: to urge readers/listeners to eagerly await the return of Christ in proper understanding and living, but to caution that this was not going to happen immediately
How is 2 Thessalonians different from 1 Thessalonians
1 Thessalonians is where Paul’s apocalyptic messages are most clear, but he does not give any of these ideas about signs of the end, as 2 Thessalonians does.
Attention to the timing of the apocalypse.
Outline of 2 Thessalonians
- The end of time in teaching and exhortation
- The end is near, but not yet: apocalyptic signs and events that bust precede the coming of Jesus
- Renewed Thanksgiving, teaching, salvation
- The author requests prayer from them, and prays for them
- Moral exhortation, especially against idleness and disobedience as the end draws near
Criteria for 2 Thessalonians as Pseudonymous
The main reasons given by those who question Pauline authorship include:
(1) The eschatology of 2 Thessalonians is regarded as different from that of 1 Thessalonians. Specifically, the sudden/imminent expectation of Christ’s return in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-5:11 is said to be inconsistent with the requirement in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 that specific signs must first take place.
(2) The many commonalities between 1 and 2 Thessalonians are alleged to reflect literary dependence, which is regarded as inconsistent with Paul’s authorship
(3) 2 Thessalonians supposedly has a colder tone than 1 Thessalonians. It is less concerned with community.
(4) 2 Thessalonians 2:2 and 3:17 are thought to make best sense if written by a pseudonymous author
Example: The Day of the Lord
1 Thessalonians 5
vs.
2 Thessalonians 2
1 Thessalonians 5
- The “Day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night” “sudden destruction”
- Authentic Pauline Tone: urgent voice
2 Thessalonians 2
- “Not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed”
- Signs that the Lord will come
- 2 Thessalonians talks about “The Lawless One” and is worked up around apocalyptic thought
- Similar to other writings in the 90s, such as the book of Revelations
The Persuasive Purpose of Apocalyptic
2 Thessalonians is not just eschatological, but apocalyptic in theology and (to some extent) in style
- Eschaton: the end
- Apocalyptic adds further nuances to the eschaton; the end
- Like most Christian apocalyptic, it tries to balance two poles: lively expectation of the end of time with a caution that the end is not yet. Errors occur at each pole.
- Apocalyptic often features a sharper distinction between the “in-group” and the “out-group” than other parts of the NR. It urges the in-group to stay loyal to God because the persecuting “out-group” will be punished in the end
Apocalyptic is dramatic and visionary in style, and a favourite challenge for Western artists.
Historical Context of Colossians
Author: a substantial minority holds for Paul; a growing majority holds for a disciple of Paul after his death
Audience: the Church at colossae in the Roman province of Asia. Founded by Paul’s co-worker Epaphras, it is a Pauline church
Date: if by Paul, 61-64 from Rome; most who hold for pseudonymity place it in the 80s
Integrity and Unity: not questioned
Purpose: To motivate believers to hold the cosmic Christ, putting away false teaching about salvation and immoral practices carried over from Gentile life
Historical Jesus
Jesus of History
Until the resurgence of critical studies in the 19th century, Christians did not become focused with the Jesus of History.
Christ of Faith
Image that early Christians came to have about Jesus, especially w regard to his death and resurrection
Paul did not seem to be concerned with the Jesus of History, but was very focused on the Christ of Faith.