Paul: Follower or Founder of Christianity? Flashcards
Who claims that Paul founded Christianity as we know it?
Many liberal scholars claim that Paul is the real founder of Christianity as we know it
Was Paul a Follower or Founder?
5 Noteworthy Matters Related with this Topic
- Paul did not know the historical Jesus (although they were contemporaries)
- From his letters, we can say that Paul was not concerned too much about the historical Jesus’ teachings and actions (Paul does not describe what Jesus said or did).
- From his letters, he seems to focus most on the so-called “Paschal Mystery” (Death-Resurrection-Glorification) of Christ. Perhaps Paul was insecure about his lack of knowledge about the real historical Jesus, and he only knew the risen Christ, so he focused on that.
- Paul emphasized that humans are saved through the sacrifice on the cross
- (And that) Jesus’ sacrifice and its efficacy for the salvation of humanity has been validated through God’s action of raising Jesus from the dead
Paul did not know the historical Jesus (although they were contemporaries). From his letters, we can say that Paul was not concerned too much about the historical Jesus’ teachings and actions (Paul does not describe what Jesus said or did).
Does this really mean that Paul never talked about the teachings and ministry of Jesus?
A letter is like listening to a phone conversation: you only know what that person is telling the other party, and you cannot hear the other party. Paul’s letters are a one-sided conversation in which Paul is responding to certain concrete issues (except in Romans). If Paul was really into Jesus’ teaching and acts, he most likely would have quoted Jesus in his letters (Jesus taught this, so let’s practice it!) His concern for Jesus’ teaching would have spilled into his letters, but it does not.
HOWEVER, in actually preaching, we cannot rule out that Paul was not concerned with Jesus’ teaching.
From his letters, he seems to focus most on the so-called “Paschal Mystery” (Death-Resurrection-Glorification) of Christ. Perhaps Paul was insecure about his lack of knowledge about the real historical Jesus, and he only knew the risen Christ, so he focused on that.
Paul was most likely not invested in what Jesus said and did, and instead, he was focused with Jesus’ resurrection and its significance. This was the focus of many early Christian disciples; their proclamations were Christocentric.
Paul was not invested in what Jesus said and did. He was focused with Jesus’ resurrection and its significance. Where else do we find this?
The Nicene Creed
The “Empty-Centre”: Incarnation → Death & Resurrection
The Creed is not interested in what Jesus taught and did
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Born around 4 CE
Paul was more or less a contemporary of Jesus, but never met him.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Grew up in Nazareth of Galilee
Jesus grew up in a rural area, but only 5km from an urban city centre. Though it appears that Jesus did not go to Cepherus to preach very often
Paul grew up in Tarsus, a major urban city centre, a cosmopolitan town.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Jesus spoke Aramaic, perhaps Hebrew, and probably some Greek
How would Jesus have known Greek?
- Nazareth is just 5 km from Cepherus, the biggest and most cosmopolitan town in Galilee, but the NT does not mention that Jesus went there.
- Jesus helped Joseph in the carpentry business, and they had to go to Sepherus, which was involved in a huge reconstruction after the revolution and subsequent destruction of the town, so they would have had to know some Greek in that case
Greek was a mother language for Paul, he was well-educated in Tarsus.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Was initially associated with John the Baptist, but emerged as a public figure in his own right around 28 CE
This was considered old at the time.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Jesus announced the imminent coming of the Reign of God and, in preparation for that, summoned people to repent (Apocalyptic Thought)
Paul was apocalyptic in thought too. Both were influenced by apocalyptic thinking.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Jesus used parables to announce the reign of Israel’s God
Paul did not use parables; or at least we do not know of any parables used by Paul. The parables of Jesus are a dominant feature in the Synoptic Gospels. Paul does not make any mention of Jesus’ parables.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Conducted itinerant ministry throughout villages of Galilee
Jesus’ ministry was directed to rural areas. Paul’s ministry was directed to urban areas
Luke is in some way connected with Paul; Luke does not mention Galilee in his Acts of the Apostles or Resurrection story
Paul did not even go to Sepherus, which was 5km from Nazareth
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Jesus effected remarkable cures, including exorcisms, as enactments of his message
Paul did this too, these ministries were shared by both Jesus and Paul.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Jesus shared in table fellowship with a socioculturally diverse group.
Jesus opened his table to anyone who wanted to join. He was not exclusive of anyone (unclean, impure, etc.). This is very similar to Paul, who accepted anyone
Both Jesus and Paul crossed boundaries.
Both Jesus and Paul broke the boundaries through inclusion. Paul was very much like Jesus, in this way..
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Called a close group of disciples and gave 12 of them a special status.
Paul did not call together a special group of disciples, but he had collaborators. He had a network of collaborators who lived out the way of Jesus in the style of Paul.
N.T. Wright: What can we say about the historical Jesus?
Jesus performed a dramatic action in the Temple
Acts says that Paul was arrested in the Temple when he brought the collection for his radical messages. Paul stood in trial before Caesar.