Part 31 (Porter) (****) Flashcards
Insurance Regulation
Development of Insurance Regulation Timeline
1752 First Insurer charted - Philadelphia
Early 1800s Sporadic state insurance regulation
1869 Paul v Virginia
1871 National Insurance Convention
1890 Sherman Antitrust Act
1914 Clayton Antitrust Act
1936 Robinson-Patman Act
1944 South-Eastern Underwriters Assocation decision
1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act
1972 NAIC: Unfair Claims Settlement Practices and Unfair Trade Practices Act
1999: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
What event is important in dealing with state insurance and regulation
Paul v Virginia
What happened in Paul v Virginia
Paul applied to be a licensed insurance agent in VA for NY insurers, but was denied. He sold the policies anyways and got arrested
Paul appealed to U.S. Supreme Court
Court Decided and agreed with VA lower court
What is the main concept in Paul v Virginia
Insurance is a contract delivered locally, thus insurance contract is not interstate commerce.
States should continue to regulate own insurance markets without violating Constitiution
What happened in response a little later in relation to Paul v Virginia
National Insurance Convention
Why did the National Insurance Convention get formed
More insurers in mid 1800s were operating in several states and were not happy with the outcome of Paul v Virginia because they were having problems meeting various state demands.
What did the NIC formation create
- A constitution setting forth the regulators’ goals
- Designed a uniform accounting statement
- Adopted Guideline for insurer taxation
- Adopted first model law which covered things like commissioner’s duties, and regulation of specific insurance
What also was a problem that happened around the same time as NIC formation
Insurers began writing multiline insurance, such as auto with property, but the DOI didn’t allow multiline insurers.
How were insureds supposed to get their auto and property insurance before the 1900s
Purchase two policies from separate insurers
What state first allowed multiline policies, sorta, what was the catch
New York, Two insurers were still needed and would share premiums and losses. But this happened in the back end.
When did regulators start to see the need for multiline policies and when did they allow it
1930’s
1945
How did insurance companies sell multiple lines if multi policies were not allowed
They created subsidiaries
WHat happened Pre-SeUA decision in mid 1800s that caused insurance companies to see insolvencies
There was fierce competition, and some companies would lower rates below adequate levels and go into insolvent
What did insurers do to stop this widespread insolvency from happening
Insurers formed compacts and associations to control rates
DId the compacts formed work
Not totally since insurers who did not agree to the compact still underpriced rates and the cycle continued
What were the two views of insurance compacts
- It deterred open and free competition (kind of like a monopoly)
- It provided the public with best interest, since it prevented insolvencies and insureds would never have to worry about not getting paid because of this.
Why did antitrust sentiments begin to flourish in the 1800s
There was lack of corporate regulation and some industry and financial executives acted unethically
What act was passed that addressed the antitrust sentiments but did not fully apply
Sherman Antitrust Act in 1980
Why did the Sherman Antitrust Act not directly apply to insurers
Insurance was not interstate commerce as seen in Paul v Virginia
Even though the Sherman Antitrust Act did not directly apply to insurers, what did it motiviate
States to pass their own antitrust laws against controlling rates, which prohibited insurer compacts from controlling rates
What formed after states began to repeal their antitrust laws
The SEUA (South Eastern Underwriters association) formed
What did Federal Investigation find when SEUA formed as states began to repeal antitrust laws
- Continuing agreement and concert of action to take control of 90% of the fire and allied lines market
- Fixing premium rates and agent’s commission
- Using boycott and other forms of coercion and intimidation to force non-SEUA members to comply
- Withdrawing rights of agents to represent SEUA members if they also represented non-SEUA companies
- Threatening insurance consumers with boycott and loss of patronage if they didn’t purchase insurance from SEUA members
When SEUA case was initially brought up, what did the U.S. Supreme court decide in relation to
It was initially dismissed due to Paul v Virginia where the Sherman Antitrust act did not technically apply to insurance companies
When did the U.S Supreme court agree to hear the SEUA case
In 1994
What were the two key questions the court decided when considering the SEUA case
- Did congress intend the Sherman Act to prohibit insurer’s conduct of restraining/ monopolizing business?
- Do insurance transactions across state lines constitute “commerce among several states”, which will subject them to congressional regulation?
What were the answers to the two key questions in the SEUA case
Yes, congress did intend the Sherman Act to prohibit insurer’s conduct of business
Yes, insurance transactions across state lines does constitute commerce among several states which subjects them to Congressional regulation
What were some reasons the court decided that insurance transactions across state lines does constitute commerce…
- Other Intangible products were subject to congressional regulation
- Not a single business conduction business across state lines is beyond the regulatory powers of congress. Insurers should not be an exception
- Most of the SEUA members were not domiciled in a state
What happened in the conclusion of the SEUA decision
Federal Legislation now applied to insurance
- Sherman Act, which prohibited collusion in attempts to gain monopoly power
- Clayton Act, which made practices that lessened competition or created monopoly power illegal
What are some examples of the Clayton acts that were made illegal
- Price discrimination, where the amended version called Robinson-Patman Act required price differences to be justified by reducing operating costs
- Tying, which made illegal the requirement of purchase of 1 product to purchase another
What did State regulators and insurance industry believe needed to be changed about the SEUA decision
Some forms of cooperation among insurance companies was necessary.
It needed establishing of statistical base for adequate rates
What needed to be amended in SEUA decision Acts
- Congress must be pressured to enact legislation under commerce clause which allows states to continue to regulate insurance
- Sherman Act and Clayton act must ammend to allow cooperative arrangements to establish adequate rates and coverages
- FTC Act and Robinson-Patman Act must be amended to exclude insurance
The McCarran-Ferguson ACt of 1945 did what two things
What were the exceptions
a. Gave the NAIC and insurance industry what they wanted from SEUA
b. Returned Regulation of insurance back to states (justified by it was in the public best interest)
Exceptions:
- Sherman Act Continues to apply to the use of boycott, coercion, or intimidation
- Congress law that applies only to the insurance industry, it will supersede any state regulation