parl structure Flashcards
benefits of having 2 chambers
- represents different interests, states in federal system
- greater scrutiny and revision for legislation (rwanda bill, HoL)
- upper house has checks and balances
who sits where in the Hoc
- governing party on the right and opposition on the left
- shadow mins and ministers are front benchers
- non mins mps are backbenchers
what is it like being an MP
- 2023: £86,584
- parl priveledge: legal immunity, right to free speech (no fear of prosecution)
- parl expenses also paid, running office, employing staff, accommodation, travel
- each house has the right to regulate its own internal affairs without interference from outside bodies (courts)
- expected to be totally loyal in the chamber if your party is in gov
- no induction into how to be a ‘good’ mp, cannot effectively scrutinise or make effective change as they are not taught how
what are mps not allowed to do
- address another MP by name only by title
- speak until called by the speaker by bobbing
- cannot clap to show approval in the HoC
erskine may and mp behaviour rules
- cannot call others liars or hypocrites
- mp is called to apologise for foul language to others or will be ejected
mp behaviour in the HoC
- PMQ heckling, roaring, screeching, bellowing etc
- either wrong foot a speaker on the opposition or one liners shouted in short silences
- practiced hecklers: michael dugher, labour
- tory have heckling squads –> departmental support groups
- dennis skinner: called C members crooks and apologied by reversing the statement, called david C as dodgy dave
public opinion of PMQ
22 feb 17
- 2% watched it to the end
- less than 1/3 said they had watched ones before but not thsi one
- 54% said they had never watched it
- 77% said there was too much ‘party political point scoring instead of answering the question’
- 23% said it put them off politics
arguments for and against changing the structure of the HoC
FOR
- adversarial chamber that damages our politics
- encourages less confrontational debates if semi circle
- reduces the tribalism which puts the public off
AGAINST
- shape cannot change culture and personality –> this is the issue
- creates clear divisions against parties
- debate and disagreement makes sharp policy
what do whips do
- ensuring mps attend parliament divisions and approving absence when their role is not needed
- instructing how mps should vote, debate with votes are underlined –> ‘3 line whip’, strict instruction to vote according to party line or face disciplinary action, most important divisions
- alistair campbell: chief w of L of Hoc
- lord kennedy of southwark: chief w of L and HoL
- simon hart: C and HoC
- baroness williams of trafford C and HoL
what does the speaker do
- presides over debates and maintains order
- cant temp suspend rule breakers
- elected by mps by secret ballot, no party affiliation, vote is for tie breaker and debate
- stand down at GE but usually re-elected
john bercow as a speaker (significance)
- allowed multiple urgent questions a day, MPs talked of major issues, rather than to be appearing to ignore them
- significance: increased scrutiny of gov by backbenchers, allowed for different party views to be expressed and elected MPs could express the opinions of people in parl
- allowed parl expression to a major current of public opinion
- annoying, bullying allegations, attempted secret vote to get him removed
- allowed emergency motions to be more than a bland formulation
- procedural rulings: commons maj = real authority over events making mps unhappy
- partisan: bias and party alliance, allows pregnant and new mother mps to cast proxy votes
lindsay hoyle as a speaker
- elected by AV
- hoyle is experienced, impartial on brexit and can handle a crisis
- equality and reputation –> tolerance
- difficult to depart from conventions, not as willing as bercow
life peers in the HoL and significance
- 695 in nov 2016
- life peerages act 1958: appoint members to the upper house for life, no inheritance
- PM: recommends individuals for appointments
- life peerages act 1958 and HoL act 1999, diversity and professionalism –> former mps, business people, educations and arts sector all have lords
- having diff professionals allows for expertise to review gov policy
hereditary peers in HoL and significance
- 92 –> HoL act 1999, elected
- 75 elected by ballots of hereditary peers from their party and crossbench groups
- peerages act 1963: H peers can renounce titles and memberships of the Lords
- why is this bad: unelected representatives, PMs can influence who is appointed (michelle moan and ppe)
how is lords reform effective or not effective
- increased equality, removal of unelected peers
- increased diversity and professionalism
- having different professionals have different people review policies of gov
- independent HoL appointment, commission, unbiased
BUT
- pm can influence who is appointed, blair 2006-7, michelle m and johnson
- unelected house
what are the 5 functions of parl
- legislation
- debate
- scrutiny and accountability
- recruiting minsters
- representation
what is scrutiny and accountability
- parliament examines the policies and work of the executive to hold it to account
- ensures gov is accountable by requiring ministers to explain and justify their actions