Constitutional reform - Modern (2015-2022) Flashcards
how did the 2018 european union withdrawal act affect the const
- repealed the 1972 european communities act: new eu laws no longer took direct effect in the UK
- allowed existing eu laws to be retained on UK statue book as new UK law category
why was standing order 14 suspended during the negotiation of the 2018EUWA
- SO14: gov business takes precedence at all meetings except 20 oppositions +35 back bench days etc
- suspended to seize control of the commons timetable by MPs, could approve their own business of house (invl Brexit voting)
why was the humble address used more commonly during brexit negotiations
- humble address: rarely used parliamentary procedure where C or L could send message to the monarch on opposition day
- labour used this to make opposition day motions binding for a return –> labour made the conservative gov release documents showing possible economic impact of brexit for a 2017 labour motion
- holds gov accountable and ensures political transparency
supreme court ruling for R Miller vs Sec of State for exiting EU 2017
Q: can Pm trigger article 50 and begin Brexit using perogative powers to negotiate treaties
A: parliamentary approval needed before gov can before can
- this was needed as the royal prerogative cannot be used to amend/repeal existing laws and the Uk would have to leave the eu with the rights of Uk citizens as EU citizens being removed
disagreement over prerogative war powers 2018
- 2011: commons should be able to debate whether to deploy troops in an emergency, but what are the exceptiojns
- theresa may approved syrian air strikes after syria allegedly used chemical weapons without a vote, only done 2 days after in commons
- undermined the convention: showed the vote for war needed to be legally binding
scotland act 2016
- devolved additional legislative powers
- devolved real income tax powers
- recognised as an act of parliament
wales act 2017
- can make on all reserved matters
- assemebly name changed to senedd cymru
- sewel convention: parl will not usually legislate on S or W matters without consent
- recognised as an act of parliament
- assembly not abolished without a referendum
how did Miller vs sec of state show the limitations of the S and W acts
- supreme court: the sewel convention is not legally enforceable
- EU withdrawal act, law concerning devolved matters passed without legislative consent of S, W or NI
why was the EU legal continuity scotland billl refereed to the UK supreme court and what did they rule
- transferred all EU law on devolved matters onto scotlands
- section 17: secondary leg by Uk minsters to amend retained laws would require scottish consent
- sent to supreme court –> can scotland limit WM
what was EVEL? what was the west-lothian question
- WLQ: mps of S,W, NI can vote on E only matters but not vice versa
- english MPs have opportunities to veto clauses of bills that affect only england
- needs a double majority –> whole commons and english MPs
- speaker decides who it affects and must be processed to ensure EVEL
why was Boris johnsons attempted prorogation of parliament controversial
- brings current session to an end
- during this neither Lords or commons can meet –> J wanted to avoid the scrutiny of his brexit policy weeks before its departure
how did the house of commons respond to BJ prorogation
- emergency debate under standing order 24
- commons speaker defied custom and allowed an emergency debate on a substantive motion
how did the supreme court respond to the prorogation
- johnsons prorogation advice to the queen was unlawful
- prevented parliament function, sovereignty and deemed unlawful
what was the early parliamentary General election act 2019 and what led to its passing
- set the date of the next election as 12 december 2019
- once EU looked likely to extend negotiations to the new year, SNP and libdems proposed a plan to bring it forward (2022 to 2019)
what did the 2019 conservative manifesto say on the subject of the const
- after Brexit, broader aspects of the const (gov and parl, courts, royal prerogative, HoL, ordinary people justice) would have the spotlight
- expanding the executive’s powers