PAPER 3- TOPIC 2 COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

describe Piaget’s theory of cognitive development

A
  • children learn in a different way to adults, because they think different (shown in the stages)
  • he suggested cognitive development was as a result of two things
  • maturation - effects of the biological process of ageing (learn as we grow)
  • –> more complex mental operations become available (stages of intellectual development)
  • environment - interaction with environment
  • —-> leads to more complex understanding of world (assimilation and accommodation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define schema

A

mental framework of someone’s knowledge, beliefs and expectations, that is developed through experience

used :

  • to make shortcuts when interpreting large amounts of info
  • to understand how to act and behave in new situations
  • organise and interpret new information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Piaget’s view of the schema

A
  • children are born with a few innate schemas to allow basic interaction (e.g. grasp objects, distinguish familiar faces)
  • can be behavioural or cognitive
  • as children develop, they develop more detailed existing schemas and construct new schemas, for other people, themselves, objects, actions and later on more abstract ideas (e.g. morality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how does Piaget suggest we are motivated to learn

A
  • when in disequilibrium (our existing schema doesn’t allow us to make sense of new information)
  • to escape unpleasant experience of disequilibrium, we must adapt or develop new schemas, in order to return to preferred mental state of equilibration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

state and briefly outline, through what processes does learning take place, where schemas become more complex and adapt to new situations

A
  • assimilation - add information to existing schema

- accomodation - radically change existing schema or develop new ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe assimilation

e.g.

A

form of learning when we acquire new information or a more advanced understanding from new experiences, by adding new information to existing schemas

e.g. child can assimilate his schema of dogs, when told a different dog breed is also a dog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe accommodation

e.g.

A

form of learning where we acquire new information from a dramatically new experience that changes our understanding of a topic, and we equilibrate by constructing new schemas or radically changing existing ones

e.g. baby with schema for dogs, initially thinks cats are dogs, then told they are actually cats, accommodate new schema for cats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define equilibration

A

the preferred mental state that we achieve when we escape disequilibrium (when new information is present, that current schemas can’t make sense of)
—> done through building it into our understanding by accommodation by creating new schemas or assimilation by adding new info to schemas,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define cognitive development

A
  • development of all mental processes, but mostly thinking, reasoning and understanding of world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

describe Piaget’ stages of intellectual development

state 4 stages

A
  • four stages of intellectual development
  • each stage has different level of reasoning ability
  • all children go through same sequence of stages, maybe at slightly different ages

sensorimotor

pre-operational

concrete operational

formal operational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

summarise what is present in the sensorimotor stage

A

•age 0-2 years

  • learn object permanence (8 months)
  • learns about world through senses, and exploration in environment
  • develop basic physical co-ordination through trial and error
  • develop basic language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define object permanence

A

understanding that people/objects do still exist, even when they are out of sight

  • explains why children love peekaboo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how did psychologists show object permanence

A

Piaget’s A not B error

  • toy put under A multiple times
  • child sees it put below B
  • checks for it under A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

summarise the pre-operational stage

A

• 2-7 years

  • mobile, can use language but still lacks reasoning ability to explain how things in real world work
  • generally egocentric
  • generally struggle with conservation problems
  • begin to understand classification, but struggle with class inclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

define egocentric

A

• child’s tendency to only see the world from their own point of view
- physically and emotionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe the egocentrism study

and findings

A

• 3 mountains task

  • child does 360 surveillance of 3D mountain scene to try and see what ‘a doll’ would see from 3 different viewpoints
  • they were given 10 photos and had to choose which one suited the ‘dolls’ view

FOUND

  • pre operational children chose the picture that matched their own viewpoint
  • by age 7, children could clearly acknowledge the different point of view
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

define conservation

A
  • ability to understand that redistributing material, or a change in appearance, doesn’t affect the quantity or volume
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

describe the conservation of volume study

and findings

A
  • asked children age 5 and age 7, whether the volume of liquid in a beaker had increased in volume, after changing its physical appearance (pouring it into taller thinner beaker)

FOUND

  • children age 5 would say a different amount (cant conserve liquid)
  • children age 7 would say the same amount (can conserve liquid)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

briefly outline conservation of quantity study

A
  • two rows of eight counters
  • one row pushed closer together
  • child in pre operational stage said it had now had less counters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

define class inclusion

A

• a classification skill in which we can recognise that classes of objects are subsets of larger classes, and have their own subsets

(e.g. schnauzers are subset of dog class, dog class is subset of animal class)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

summarise the concrete operational stage

A

• age 7-11

  • children can conserve and perform well on class inclusion and egocentrism tasks
  • —-> (much improved operations)
  • however, only applied to physical objects or situations in child’s presence (only concrete)
  • —-> and can’t be applied to abstract ideas or out of sight situations/object
  • ————> as still lack abstract and formal reasoning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

summarise the formal operational stage

A

• 11+ years

  • capable of formal reasoning (in abstract and out of sight situations)
  • —> 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁
  • now capable of scientific, abstract and idealist thinking-> (if this changed, what would happen)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

how can formal reasoning be tested

A
  • syllogisms

e. g. if cats have 2 heads, I have a cat, how many head does my cat have
- younger children become distracted by fact cats have one head so wouldn’t answer correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

describe Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development

A
  • saw development as a social process, of learning from experts in our environment
  • where knowledge goes from being intermental (between expert and learner) and intramental (within mind of learner)
  • through social interaction, children learn knowledge and develop more advanced reasoning abilities
  • 𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺
  • he also referred to the importance of………
    • cultural factors influencing elementary functions
    • the zone of proximal development
    • scaffolding
    • language
    ………in cognitive development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

describe what an expert is

A
  • more experienced others, that have greater knowledge on a particular subject than you
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what did Vygotsky suggest the importance of “culture influencing elementary functions” was on cognitive development

A
  • elementary mental functions are developed into higher mental functions by the influence of culture
  • the role of culture is to develop the mental functions that will be most important in the physical and social environments of their culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

define elementary functions

e.g???

what happens to them

A

innate basic cognitions
e.g. perception or memory

  • they are developed and influenced by culture to form culturally suitable higher mental fucntions (e.g. mathematical ability)
28
Q

define ZPD

A

• zone of proximal development

  • a gap between a child’s current level of development and what they can potentially do, with interactions with an expert
29
Q

describe the importance of the ZPD in cognitive development

A
  • a zone in which children can learn new information
  • with expert assistance and scaffolding, a child can cross the ZPD and learn as much their developmental stage suggests they are capable of
30
Q

define scaffolding

A

the process of an expert helping a learner cross the zone of proximal development, and advancing them as much as their development stage suggests they are capable of

31
Q

describe how scaffolding is used to help the development of cognition

examples of scaffolding techniques

A
  • amount of help starts off high and decrease as learner crosses ZPD, and understands
  • only provide help when necessary

e. g. to help, experts may use technique such as
- demonstration
- modelling
- prompts/verbal cues
- demonstrations

32
Q

describe the importance of language in the development of cognition

A
  • culture is transmitted by experts to child, using semiotics
  • language is the most important semiotic
  • language allows the child to move from communicating with expert (pre-intellectual speech), to communicating with themselves and resolving their own problems (a sign of intellectual development)
33
Q

similarities between Piaget and Vygotsky’s theories

A
  • believe children learn more as they grow
  • both believe in role of biological factors in development (Piaget- maturation, Vygotsky- elementary functions)
  • children play an active role in their development (Piaget- schemas, Vygotsky -actively learn from others)
34
Q

differences between Piaget and Vygotsky

A
  • Childs thinking is qualitively different to adults
  • Vygotsky emphasises role of others in learning, Piaget believes its an individual process
  • Vygotsky believes in the role of the biological factor: innate elementary functions whereas Piaget believes in role of the biological factor: maturation
  • Piaget believes in universal stages, Vygotsky believes that culture influences cognitive development
35
Q

define social cognition

A
  • the mental processes used, when we engage in social interactions.
  • these processes lead to an understanding of social situations and dictates what behaviour is performed
36
Q

describe Selman’s theory on perspective taking

include definition of perspective taking

A
  • perspective taking is our ability to appreciate a social situation from another persons point of view
  • perspective taking develops over a clear developmental sequence of 5 levels
  • based his theory of his research study
37
Q

difference between egocentrism (Piaget) and perspective taking (Selman)

A
  • egocentrism is the physical ability to see things from others peoples visual point of view
  • perspective taking is the social ability to appreciate a social situation from another perons’s point of view
38
Q

describe Selman’s research into perspective taking

A
39
Q

describe Selman’s research into perspective taking

findings

A
  • asked twenty 4 year olds, twenty 5 year olds and twenty 6 year olds, to explain how Holly, Holly’s friend and Holly’s father would feel
  • after they were told Holly climbed a tree to rescue her friend’s cat, but she promised her dad she wouldn’t climb trees anymore as she injured herself before

FINDINGS:
- found distinct levels of perspective taking in a developmental sequence that correlated with age

40
Q

state (with age) Selman’s 5 levels of perspective taking

A

stage 0 - socially egocentric ( 3 - 6 years old )

stage 1 - social information role taking ( 6- 8 years old )

stage 2 - self reflective role taking ( 8- 10 years old )

stage 3 - mutual role taking ( 10 - 12 years old )

stage 4 - social and conventional system role taking ( 12 + years old )

—– development through stages is based on maturation and experience

41
Q

describe the development of perspective taking at stage 0

A

•socially egocentric • 3-6 years old

  • can’t distinguish between own emotions and emotions of others
  • can identity emotional states in others but not what social behaviour may have caused them
42
Q

describe the development of perspective taking at stage 1

A

• social information role taking • 6-8 years old
- can tell difference between own point of view and point of view of others, but only because they assume others have different information

43
Q

describe the development of perspective taking at stage 2

A

• self-reflective role taking • 8-10 years old

  • can put themselves completely in another persons point of view and fully appreciate their perspective
  • can only take on one point of view at a time
44
Q

describe the development of perspective taking at stage 3

A

•mutual role taking • 10-12 years old

- can look at a situation from their own point of view and that of another person at the same time

45
Q

describe the development of perspective taking at stage 4

A

• social and conventional role taking • 12 + years old

  • realise that understanding someone else’s viewpoint isn’t always enough for their to be agreement
  • understand the need for social conventions in keeping things in order
46
Q

describe the later developments to Selman’s theory

A

Selman recognised that his stages didn’t FULLY explain social cognition
Researchers added 3 further aspects to social development:

  • interpersonal understanding - if we can develop to take other’s perspectives, we can understand social situations
  • interpersonal negotiation strategies - as well as understanding social situations, we must develop social skills, to respond
  • awareness of personal meaning of relationships - as well as understanding social situations and how to manage them (above), we must develop an ability, to reflect our behaviour based on the context of the social relationships present
47
Q

define Theory of Mind

A

the ability to know what people are thinking and feeling (aka mind reading), through understanding that someone else has a separate mind to our own, and so sees the world differently

48
Q

state the 4 key studies for Theory of Mind

A
  • Meltzoff study on intentions of toddlers (neurotypical)
  • Wimmer and Perner false belief task (neurotypical)
  • Sally Anne Study (Baron Cohen) - also false belief task (explaining autistic children)
  • Baron Cohen Eyes task - (explaining autism in adults)
49
Q

describe Meltzoff’s study

A

•study of toddler’s intentional reasoning •

  • children of 18 months, in the experimental condition, observed adults dropping some beads as they try to put all the beads in a jar
  • those in the control condition observed adults get all beads in jar successfully
50
Q

findings of Meltzoff study

A
  • found, in both conditions, the toddlers successfully placed all the beads in the jar, dropping no more in the experimental condition than control
  • shows they were imitating what the adults were intending to do, not what they did do, showing a simple TOM
51
Q

describe Wimmer and Perner’s study

includes definition of false belief task

A

• false belief task to test whether children can understand that people can believe something that isn’t true •

  • told 3-4 year olds, Maxi put chocolate in blue cupboard
  • when maxi leaves his mother puts chocolate in green cupboard
  • ask children what cupboard Maxi will look in when he gets back
52
Q

findings of Wimmer and Perner’s study

A

when asked what cupboard Maxi will look in for the chocolate, when he gets back

  • – most 3 year olds said green cupboard, assuming he knew what they knew
  • – most 4 year olds correctly said blue cupboard
  • suggests TOM begins and becomes more advanced at age 4
53
Q

define autism

characteristics of someone with autism

A

• a mental spectrum of disorders, with a range of conditions with differing severity
(ASD- autistic spectrum disorder)

  • struggle with social interaction
  • abnormal behaviour
  • difficulty understanding communication and emotion
  • learning
  • under/over reaction in senses (sensory overload)
54
Q

describe Baron Cohen’s Sally Anne study

A
  • Sally put marble in her basket
  • when Sally isn’t looking, Anne moves it to her box
  • where will Sally look for marble

he tested a ‘children with ASD’ group, one control of children with down syndrome, one control of neurotypical children

55
Q

findings of Baron Cohen’s Sally Anne study

A

85% of control correctly said Sally would look in basket

20% of ASD answered correctly

  • suggesting autism involves a TOM defecit and this can explain the disorder
56
Q

describe Baron Cohen’s Eyes Test, and why did he develop it

A
  • adults with ASD could complete Sally Anne study with ease, because they were basic tasks involving little complexity
  • Baron Cohen developed a more complex study to test TOM in adults with ASD
  • P’s had to read the correct emotions from images of eyes
57
Q

findings of Baron Cohen’s Eyes test

A
  • found ASD adults performed poorly on this task

- support Baron Cohen’s theory that ASD is characterised by a defecit in TOM

58
Q

how was the TOM become an explanation for Autism

A
  • typical characteristics is that they find social interaction and interpreting emotions difficult
  • could be explained by an inability to understand the feelings and thoughts of others
  • –> as they don’t realise that they have different minds and so may view the world differently (ToM)
  • shown by Baron Cohen’s research
59
Q

define mirror neuron

A

a unique, specialised cell in the brain that fires in response to personal action and the observed actions of others

  • –> they mirror the activity of another individual
  • –> they send messages to limbic system in brain which helps us empathise and take perspectives
60
Q

how are mirror neurons involved in social cognition

A

allow us to interpret intentions and emotions of others

61
Q

what processes have mirror neurons been found to be important in

A
  • understanding intentions
  • perspective taking
  • human evolution
  • explaining autism
62
Q

describe the link between mirror neurons and intentions

A
  • Gallese and Goldman suggested that mirror neurones responded not just to observed actions but the intentions behind actions
  • led to the idea that we simulate the action of others in our motor system, and therefore simulate their intentions, in our limbic system, using our mirror neurons
    (e. g. see adult put marbles in jar, if some fall out, mirror neurones may allow us to understand their true intention, by interpreting the reflected motor response of our mirror neurons)
63
Q

describe the link between mirror neurons and perspective taking

A

𝙞𝙛 𝙢𝙞𝙧𝙧𝙤𝙧 𝙣𝙚𝙪𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙨 :
…… it provides us with a neural mechanism to experience and understand the perspectives of others
- we can simulate what people are thinking and feeling (ToM and perspective taking)
—-> through interpreting and making judgement on our own mirror neuron response

64
Q

describe the link between mirror neurons and human evolution

A

•Ramachandran emphasised importance of mirror neurons on development of human as a social species

  • they facilitate the experience of intentions, emotions and perspectives of others, allowing for the complex social interactions of humans
  • —-> therefore with these abilities we can maintain life in large groups with complex social roles, and rules
65
Q

describe the explanation of ASD, through mirror neurons

A
  • many features of autism are associated with the cognitive abilities the mirror neurons are linked to

•Ramachandran proposed the broken mirror theory

  • a neurological defect in mirror neurons prevents child from understanding and imitating social behaviour of others —> leading to diagnosis in later life as imitate adult behaviour less
  • in adult life, there are challenges with social communication as can’t develop ability to read intention and emotion of others
66
Q

describe briefly how mirror neurons were discovered

A
  • Rizzolatti was studying motor cortex’s in monkeys

- when he grabbed his food, the monkey brain area that performs this action increased in activity