Paper 1 key notes Flashcards
Define binding factors
Aspects of a situation that make a person ignore/minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour, resulting in them feeling a reduced moral strain.
What were the obedience rates in each variation of Milgram’s study
Original study- 65%
Increased proximity with learner- 40%
Touch proximity- force hand onto plate- 30%
Decreased proximity from experimenter (phone)- 20.5%
Run down location- 47.5%
Experimenter in normal clothes (no uniform)- 20%
Obedience rates if participants witnesses someone else disobey
10% (down from 65%)
Findings of Lewis (1936)
37% of OCD patients had OCD parents and 21% had OCD siblings
SS episodes
child being encouraged to explore
a stranger entering the room and attempting to interact with the child
the caregiver leaves the child and the stranger together
the caregiver returns and the stranger leaves
the caregiver leaves the child alone
the stranger returns
the caregiver returns and is reunited with the child
Attachment types and rates
Insecure avoidant (Type A). 20-25%. UK toddlers. Explore freely, No need for proximity or secure base. Show little separation/stranger anxiety. Type B 60-75% Secure. Explore happily. Seek moderate proximity. Use caregiver as secure base. Show moderate stranger/separation anxiety. Type C Less than 3%. Show little exploration, seek great proximity show great stranger/separation anxiety. Rejects comfort on reunion.
Rutter sample and IQ rates
Sample size 165 Mean IQ: before 6 months: 102 6 months-2 years: 86 After 2 years 77
Attachment rates of BEIP (Zeenah et al) and sample size
95 children 12-31 months (90% institutional care)
Control group 50 no institution
19% sample secure compared to 74% control
65% disorganised
44% disinhibited- less than 20% control
Love quiz findings and sample size
620 replies 56% secure 35% Insecure avoidant 19% insecure resistant Secure most likely to have good, long-lasting relationships Avoidant- jealous, feared intimacy