P1 - Situation Ethics Flashcards
why was situation ethics created
created by Joseph Fletcher in the 60s – he rejected legalism and antinomianism
thought that Christian moral decision-making should change because of changing political and social views
traditional Christian ethical theories aren’t flexible
adapted to modern life
What is legalism
traditional forms of Christian rule-based morality… Natural moral law and divine command theory
– rejected by Fletcher, he regarded them as inflexible
What is antinomianism
Christian and secular forms which claim that each situation is totally unique
- some Christians claim they just ‘know’ what is right and wrong by direct guidance from the Holy Spirit
- in secular existentialism, individuals make their own morality through their responses to the challenges of life
- rejected by Fletcher, he claimed that Christian antinomians ignored Jesus’ law of love
Bible quote that support situationism
“For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, ‘you shall love your neighbour as yourself’” – Galatians 5:14
What is situationism
halfway between legalism and antinomianism
based on agape (selfless love)
apart from Jesus’ law of love, there are no universally and exceptionally binding moral rules
what is agape
- greek word used in the New Testament. Adopted by Fletcher to refer to selfless love
- altrusic, ‘purpose not passion’
- based on reason
- accepts the Bible as the only source of absolute principle - but rejects all other supposedly revealed biblical laws
what is conscience
process of making moral decisions
rejected traditional approaches like intuition or a feeling of shame
conscience is something we do, not something we have – a form of guidance
What are fletcher’s four presumptions
- pragmatism
- contextual relativism
- positivism
- personalism
what is pragmatisim
assessing whether something works in achieving the final telos, agape
“A pragmatist takes his back upon fixed principles, and pretended absolutes. He turns towards the concreteness and adequacy , forward facts, forward actions, and forward power”
what is contextual relativism
assessing what is the most loving thing in each situation
what is positivism
the basis of situation ethics is agape – requires a leap of faith as it stems from the belief that God is love
ethical norms are not rational: they are held as an act of judgement and of faith
what is personalism
fletcher’s situationism is people-centered (humans are created imago dei, in God’s image), so the needs of people take priority over rules
what are fletcher’s six working principles
- love is only always good
- love is the only norm
- love and justice are the same
- love is not liking
- love justifies its means
- love’s decisions are made according to the situation and not according to the rules
what does he mean by ‘love is only always good’
love is only a predicate: not objectively real, it is something we do
Fletcher’s quote on love is the only norm
“… drop the legalist’s love of law, and accept only the law of love.”
what does he mean by ‘love is not liking’
love is conative (about the will)
Fletcher’s quote on love justifies its means
“… what is sometimes good may at other times be evil, and what is sometimes wrong may sometimes be right when it serves a good enough end – depending on the situation”
strengths of situation ethics
- an attempt to find a middle way between legalism and the random nature of antinomianism, makes it very flexible
- emphasises freedom of choice, encourages taking responsibility – people are empowered to make their own decisions
- promotes social justice, motivates people to change things for the better
- encourages a selfless approach to moral decision-making: seeks other’s best interests, attempts to be true to Jesus’ teaching
- Fletcher tried to produce an ethical approach that works in the modern age and meets people’s needs – situation ethics can accommodate new technology, e.g. medical ethics
weaknesses of situation ethics
- whether it is a middle way – it may be subjective and close to antinomianism
- it sidelines 2000 years of church traditions and authority, and 3000 years of biblical authority
- amount of responsibility it puts upon the individual, ends up with more moral responsibility
- gives a distorted view of legalism, those who follow a rule-based morality prioritise when rules conflict
- values in rules does not diminish their freedom, following rules is not a sign of immaturity
- fletcher’s flawed perception of human nature, the agapeic calculus is vague and hard to apply
- there is at times a lack of clarity in Fletcher’s understanding of love, equation of love with justice is not true to Jesus’ teaching in the sermon on the mount
- almost all the examples given by Fletcher in support of his views are very extreme – might suggest his theory works only in extreme situations, raises questions about the usefulness of this theory in everyday life