P1: Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Outline Harlow’s Animal Study of Attachment

A

Baby monkeys caged with wire mothers; one provided comfort the other food.
Time spent on each was measured.
All monkeys spent up to 22hr on the comfort mother, only leaving to feed.
When frightened they would cling to the cloth mother.
90 day critical period and maternal deprivation shown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strengths of Harlow’s Animal Study

A

Challenges learning theory/ Supports maternal depribation / reformed animal treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Weaknesses of Harlow’s Animal Study

A

Ethical issues/ can’t be generalised/ confounding variables of mother heads

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline Lorenz’s Animal Study

A

Greylag geese eggs were separated between their natural mother and an incubator. When the incubator eggs hatched they imprinted onto Lorenz. Checked this by covering mixed chicks and palcing a cardboard box over the top- they returned to their imprinted parent.
Critical period of 2 days.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strengths of Lorenz’s Animal Study

A

Chicks imprint on yellow gloves.

Tested by placing egg box on all chicks- still followed Lorenz.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weakness of Lorenz’s Animal Study

A

Imprinting can be reversed.

Limited application to humans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Classical Conditioning?

A

Caregiver becomes a conditioned stimulus because it’s associated with food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Operant Conditioning?

A

Negative reinforcement by feeding infants to remove discomfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weakness of Learning Theory (Conditioning)

A

Food giver isn’t always the primary attachment.
Infants have multiple attachments.
Environmental reductionism.
Geese imprint before feeding.
Contact comfort is more important than food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory

A

A child has an innate need to attach to to one main figure.

Suggests that one relationhip is more important than the rest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the internal working model?

A

Blueprint for future relationships based on your first attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the critical period?

A

2-3 year period but sensitive of up to 5 years. Can have irreversible effects if deprived of emotional care in this period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strengths of Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory?

A

Subsequent research uses Bowlby’s ideas.
Lorenz & Harlow support critical period.
Has real life application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was Ainsworth’s Strange Situation?

A

A controlled observation designed to test attachment security.
Babies are assessed on their response to playing in an unfamiliar room, being left alone, left with a strange and reunited with the caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the aim of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation?

A

To observe key attachment behaviours as a means of assessing the quality of a baby’s attachment to a caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline Ainsworth’s Strange Situation?

A

Takes place in a room with controlled conditions with a two-way mirror and/or cameras.
It can be used to judge attachment such as:
Proximity-seeking
Exploration and secure-base
Stranger anxiety
Separation anxiety
Response to reunion

17
Q

Define secure attachment

A

Associated with psychologically healthy outcomes.

Moderate stranger anxiety and ease of comfort at reunion.

18
Q

Define insecure- avoidant attachment

A

Characterised by low anxiety but weak attachment.

Low stranger and separation anxiety and little response to reunion, maybe even avoidance of caregiver.

19
Q

Define insecure- resistant attachment

A

Strong attachment and high anxiety.

High levels of stranger and separation anxiety and resistance to comfort.

20
Q

Findings of attachment in the Strange Situation

A

Secure (Type B): 60-75% of British babies.
Insecure-avoidant (Type A): 20-25%
Insecure-resistant (Type C): 3%

21
Q

Strengths of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation

A

Good Predictive Validity- Predicts later development, babies and toddlers assessed as B have better outcomes including better achievements in school.
Measures real and meaningful things in development.
Good inter- rater realibility- Bick tested it, found agreement of 94% of cases.
Controlled conditions, Strange Situation does not depend on subjective judgments.

22
Q

Weaknesses of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation

A

Culture Bound- developed in Britain and US. Babies have different experiences in different cultures which may affect responses.

23
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg study?

A

Cultural variations of attachment

24
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg do?

A

Located 32 studies of attachment where the Strange Situation had been used to investigate the proportions of babies with attachment types. Conducted in 8 counties- 15 in US. 1,990 children. Created a meta-analysis.

25
Q

What did the meta-analysis find?

A

GB and Sweden had the most securely attached babies- 75%.
China had the last - >75%.
Germany and the Netherlands had the most insecure- avoidantly attached babies- 30%.
Israel and Japan had the most insecure- resistantly attached babies.

26
Q

Strengths of the meta-analysis

A

Indigenous researchers- those from the same background as the ppt.
Potential problems of cross-culture research can be avoided eg. misunderstanding of language. Bias can be avoided.
Increased validity.

27
Q

Weaknesses of the meta-analysis

A

Confounding variables on findings: Studies are not usually matched for methodology. Environmental variables may vary.
Imposed etic: Trying to impose a test designed for one culture to another.
When we assume an idea or technique that works in one culture will work in another.

28
Q

What is maternal deprivation?

A

The emotional and intellectual consequences of separation between a child and their mother. Bowlby proposed that continuous care for a mother is essential for normal psychological development and prolonged separation can cause serious damage

29
Q

What is the difference between separation and deprivation?

A

Separation is simply not being in the prescence of a primary attachment figure. This only becomes a problem if the child is deprived from emotional care.

30
Q

What can maternal deprivation have effects on?

A

Intellectual development- Abnormally low IQ.
Demonstrated in studies of adoption.
Emotional development- Affectionless psychopathy.
Inability to express guilt or strong emotion towards others, lacking remorse.

31
Q

Outline Bowlby’s 44 Thieves Study into Maternal Deprivation

A

To investigate the link between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation.
44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing. All thieves were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy. Families were also interviewed to find whether they had prolonged early separations from their mothers.
Compared to a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionmally-disturbed young people.
Findings: 14 of 44 were described as affectionless psychopaths, 12 of these had experienced deprivation.

32
Q

Weaknesses of Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation

A

Flawed Evidence- Bowlby himself who carried out both the family interviews and assessments for affectionless psychopathy. Open to bias as he knew who he expected to show signs.
Difference between deprivation and privation- Overestimated the seriousness of the effects of deprivation.
Critical vs Sensitive Periods- Evidence that good quality after care can prevent most or all damage.

33
Q

What was Rutter’s aim in his orphan studies?

A

To investigate the extent to which good care could make up for poorly early experiences in institutions.

34
Q

What does Bowlby propose that the internal working model affects?

A

Our future relationships because it carries our perception of what relationships are like.
If a child’s first relationship is loving and reliable they will expect that all relationships are the same.