Ovarian Cancer Flashcards
What are the steps in staging Ovary Cancer?
1) Obtain any free fluid for cytology can examination
2) If no free fluid, obtain Washings by instilling and recovering 50-100mls of saline.
- The fluid should irrigate the cul de sac, parabolic gutters and area beneath each diaphragm
3) Systematically, explore all intra-abdominal organs and surfaces. They should be visualized and palpated
- bowel
- liver
- GB
- diaphragm
- mesentery
- momentum
- entire peritoneum
4) Suspicious areas/adhesions should be biopsied. If there are no suspicious areas, multiple biopsies should be obtained from the peritoneum of the cul-de-sac, paracolic gutters, bladder, and intestinal mesentery
5) Diaphragm should be biopsied/scraped for cytology.
6) Omentum should be resected from the transverse colon
7) Retroperitoneum should be explored to evaluate pelvic LN. Suspicious LN should be removed and sent for frozen section. An ipsilateral dissection may be performed only for unilateral tumor
8) Para-aortic LN should be exposed and enlarged LN removed. Nodes superior to the inferior mesenteric artery should also be resected
9) In the absence of suspicious LN, pelvic and para-aortic LN should be sampled to exclude the possibility of microscopic stage III disease
10) A TAHBSO is performed
What are the epithelial ovarian cancers?
= Adenocarcinomas.
They can be subclassified into:
- Serous
- Endometrioid
- Transitional cell (Brenner)
- Mucinous
- Clear Cell
- Mixed epithelial Tumors
- Undifferentiated
- Unclassified
What are the risk factors for ovarian CA?
Age (mean age 59yo, decreases after 80yo)
FHx
- single first degree-relative with ovarian CA puts one at 3.6x risk, with lifetime risk of 5%
- BRCA 1 or BRCA 2
- HNPCC (MSH2 24% risk, MLH1 20%, MSH6 1%)
White race
Diet with high animal fat
Nulliparity or 1st birth after 35yo
Involuntary infertility
Late menopause
Early menarche
Which subtype of ovarian cancer is strongly a/w endometriosis?
Clear cell
Which mutation does clear cell ovarian CA carry in a significant proportion?
ARID1A mutations
ARID1A mutations are found in which type of ovarian CA?
Clear Cell
Endometrioid
What is a mixed ovarian CA?
Tumor consists of >1 histo type and minor component forms >10%
What are the types of Ovarian CA?
Type 1:
- low grade, indolent
- low grade serous, Endometrioid, mucinous, cc, Malignant Brenner
- Mutations of KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, PTEN, PIK3CA, ARID1A
- relatively genetically stable
Type 2:
- No clear precursor lesion
- High grade, aggressive
- high-grade serous, high-grade Endometrioid, malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (MMMT) and undifferentiated tumor
- freq a/w TP53 mutations
What are some of the suspicious morphology on transvaginal US?
L.I.M.A.S
Large lesion Multi-lobular cysts Solid papillary projections Irregular internal septa toons Ascites
What is considered optimal cytoreduction?
No residual tumor measuring >1cm at the end of the surgery
What does CRS entail for ovarian CA?
TAHBSO Pelvic and para-aortic LN sampling Infra colic omentectomy Pelvic and peritoneal biopsies Pelvic and peritoneal Washings Appendectomy in case of mucinous histology
Is this true? Why?
Neoadj –> surgery is better than CRS –> chemo?
Vergote NEJM 2010
N=632
Aim: to identify if neoadjuvant chemo –> interval debulking was inferior to primary debulking surgery–> chemo
Incl criteria:
- Stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian CA, fallopian-tube carcinoma, PPC
Largest residual tumor was 1cm or less in 40% of primary debulked patients, and in 80% with interval debulking
Postop adverse effects and mortality higher after primary debulking
Conclusion–> Neoadj chemo not inferior
Subset analysis:
- initial CRS better for Stage III, lower volume disease
- initial Neoadj chemo better with Stage IV disease
Describe the FIGO staging broadly.
I - Tumor confined to ovaries
II - Tumor involves 1 or both ovaries with pelvic extension
III - Tumor involves 1 or both ovaries with microscopically confirmed peritoneal mets outside the pelvis +/- regional LN Mets
IV- Distant mets beyond the peritoneal cavity
Describe FIGO stage I
I = Tumor confined to the ovaries
IA = tumor limited to 1 ovary, capsule intact
- no tumor on ovarian surface
- no malignant cells in Ascites/peritoneal Washings
IB = Tumor limited to both ovaries, capsules intact.
- no tumor on ovary surface
- no malignant cells in Ascites/peritoneal Washings
IC: Tumor limited to one or both ovaries, with any of the following:
- Capsule ruptured
- tumor on ovarian surface
- positive malignant cells in the Ascites or positive peritoneal Washings
Describe FIGO Stage II
Stage II - Tumor involves 1 or both ovaries with pelvic extension
IIA: extension +/- implants in uterus +/- tubes
- no malignant cells in Ascites or peritoneal Washings
IIB: Extension to other pelvic organ
- no malignant cells in the Ascites or peritoneal Washings
IIC: IIA/B with positive malignant cells in the Ascites or positive peritoneal Washings
Describe FIGO Stage III
III = Tumor involves 1 or both ovaries with microscopically confirmed peritoneal mets outside the pelvis +/- regional LN mets
IIIA: microscopic peritoneal mets beyond the pelvis
IIIB: Macroscopic peritoneal mets beyond the pelvis, 2cm or less in greatest dimension
IIIC: Peritoneal mets beyond the pelvis >2cm in greatest dimension +/- regional LN mets
What are the trials supporting intraperitoneal chemotherapy?
1) GOG 172 trial by Deborah Armstrong
- NEJM 2006
- RCT Phase 3; n=400
- 2 arms in Stage III Ovarian CA with 1cm or less residual mass:
(I) IV Pac + IV CDDP
(II) IP Pac + IP CDDP; IV Pac
- 40% in IP group completed therapy
- mPFS 18m (IV) vs 24m (IP)
- mOS 50m vs 66m (IP)
2) Meta-analysis by Hess in 2007
- 6 RCTs 1700 patients (ovarian Ca)
- pooled HR for PFS 0.8 and pooled HR for OS 0.8 (both p significant)
3) GOG 104
- IV CDDP/Cyclo vs IP CDDP/IV Cyclo
- 2nd look laparotomy
- pCR 36% vs 47%
- mOS 41m vs 49m
4) GOG 114
- initially 3 arms:
> IV CDDP/IV Cyclo
> IV CDDP/IV Pac
> IV Carbo AUC9/IP CDDP/IVPac
- IV CDDP/Cyclo taken off
- PFS 28m vs 23m (IP better)
- OS 60m vs 50m (IP better)
What is the rationale for IP chemotherapy?
1) Major route of spread is within the peritoneal cavity
2) Ability to reduce tumor volume with debulking
3) Residual peritoneal tumor exposed to increased concentration of drug for prolonged period of time
What are the limitations of IP chemo?
Poor tumor penetration of bulky disease
Less exposure of extra-peritoneal dz to drug
What are the possible complications of IP chemo?
1) Obstruction to flow or inadequate distribution
2) Infection:
- peritonitis
- abdominal wall or catheter
3) Intestinal perforation
What are the trials that support dose-dense scheduling in ovarian CA?
1) JGOG 3016
- 2 arms:
(A) IV Pac (180)/IV Carbo (AUC6) q21 days x 6#
(B) IV Pac (80) D1,D8,D15 + IV Carbo (AUC 6) D1 q21d x 6#
- 6yr update
- mOS 60m vs 100m
- mPFS 28m vs 17m
2) MITO 7
- 2 arms:
(A) IV Pac (175)/Carbo AUC6 q21d x 6#
(B) IV Pac (60) + IV Carbo AUC2 D1,8,15 q21d x6#
- 2 yr f/u
- mPFS 17m (A) and 18m (B)
- QOL scores better with dad
- G3/4 and FN rates lower in (B)
What is the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer?
Cochrane Database by Winter-Roach. 1st published in 2009. 2 updates, latest in 2015
6RCTs (including ICON 1); >1200 patients
>95% with Stage I Ovarian CA
10yr OS HR 0.72
10yr PFS HR 0.67
Effective in prolonging survival in early stage disease. But uncertain benefit in low, and intermediate-risk early stage disease
Tell me about ICON5/GOG 182
5-arm study, to evaluate if incorporation of an additional cytotoxic agent improves OS and PFS in advanced epithelial Ovarian Ca and PPC who received Pac/Carbo.
Stage III/IV, n>4000
80% competed 8#
5arms: A) Pac/Carbo B) Pac/Carbo/Gem C) Pac/Carbo/Liposomal Doxorubicin D) Carbo+Topotecan --> Carbo/Pac E) Carbo+Gem --> Pac/Carbo
No improvements in PFS/OS
What is the role of Docetaxel in the treatment of Ovarian CA?
JNCI 2004, Vasey et al.
2 arms, 6# each:
A) Docetaxel (75)/ Carbo (AUC5)
B) Paclitaxel (175)/ Carbo (AUC5)
Responding patients get 3# more mono therapy Carbo
F/u 2 years
Similar PFS 15m, and OS of 60+%
Docetaxel with less overall and G2 neurotoxicity 10% vs 30%
Docetaxel with greater G3/4 neutropenia 94% vs 84%
Possible alternative