Organisations Movements And Members Flashcards
Churches (Troeltsch)
- large organisations with millions of members
- run by a bureaucratic hierarchy of professional priests
- claim a monopoly of the truth
- universalistic
- attractive to higher classes because they are ideologically conservative and closely linked to the state
Sects (Troeltsch)
- small exclusive groups
- hostile to wider society
- expect a high level of commitment
- draw their members from the poor and oppressed
- led by a charismatic leader rather than a bureaucratic hierarchy
- claim a monopoly of the truth
Denominations (Niebuhr)
- membership is less exclusive than a sect but don’t appeal to the whole of society like a church
- like churches they broadly accept society’s values but aren’t linked to the state
- impose minor restrictions on members eg forbidding alcohol but aren’t as demanding as sects
- tolerant of other religious organisations and don’t claim a religious monopoly of the truth
Cult (Niebuhr)
- individualistic, loose knit small group around shared themes and interests but usually without a sharply defined and exclusive belief system
- led by practitioners or therapists who claim special knowledge
- tolerant of other organisations and their beliefs
- don’t demand strong commitment from followers who are more like customers or trainees than members
- world affirming, claiming to improve life in this world
Similarities and differences between religious organisations - Wallis
- How they see themselves
While churches and sects claim a religious monopoly of the truth, denominations and cults accept that there can be many valid interpretations - How they are seen by wider society
Churches and denominations are seen as respectable and legitimate while sects and cults are seen as deviant
Bruce’s critique of Troeltsch
Bruce says that his idea of churches having a religious monopoly only applies to the catholic church before the Protestant reformation. Since then, sects and cults have flourished and religious diversity has become the norm. Churches have lost their monopoly and been reduced to the status of denominations competing with all the rest.
World rejecting NRMs
- clearly religious organisations with a clear notion of God
- highly critical of the outside world and expect or seek radical change
- to achieve salvation , members must make a sharp break with their former life
- members live communally with restricted contact with the outside world. The movement controls their lives and is accused of brainwashing them
- have conservative moral codes
World accommodating NRMs
- breakaways from existing mainstream churches or denominations
- neither accept nor reject the world and focus on religious rather than worldly matters, seeking to restore the spiritual purity of religion
- members lead conventional lives
World affirming NRMs
- accept the world as it is. Are optimistic and promise followers success in terms of mainstream goals and values like careers and personal relationships.
- non exclusive and tolerant of other religions but claim to offer additional special knowledge for followers to unlock spiritual powers for success or overcoming problems. Described as psychologising religions which offer this-worldly gratification
- most are cults and followers are customers. Few demands are placed on them and they live normal lives
Evaluate Wallis’ classification of the NRMs
- it isn’t clear whether he is categorising them according to the movements teachings or individual members’ beliefs.
- he ignores the diversity of beliefs that may exist within an NRM
- Wallis himself recognises that real NRMs rarely fit into his typology and some may have features of all three types
- Stark and Bainbridge reject the idea of constructing typologies and say we should use one criterion to identify between religious organisations: the degree of conflict between the religious group and wider society.
Sects (Stark and Bainbridge)
Sects result from schisms- splits in existing organisation. They break away from churches usually because of disagreements about doctrine. S&B say they promise other-worldly benefits to those suffering economic deprivation or ethical deprivation.
Cults (Stark and Bainbridge)
New religions that have been imported eg Scientology. S&B say they offer this-worldly benefits to prosperous individuals who are suffering psychic deprivation (normlessness) and organismic deprivation (health problems)
Audience cults (S&B)
The least organised and don’t involve formal membership or much commitment. Little interaction between members. Participation may be through the media. Eg astrology
Client cults (S&B)
Based on the relationship between a consultant and a client and provide services to their followers. Emphasis on therapies which promise personal fulfilment and self discovery.
Cultic movements (S&B)
Most organised and demand high levels of commitment. Aims to meet its members needs and they are rarely allowed to belong to other religious groups at the same time. Eg moonies
Marginality as an explanation for the growth of NRMs
Weber says sects arise in groups who are marginal to society. These groups may feel that they are disprivileged ie not receiving their just economic rewards or social status.
Sects offer a solution to this by offering their members a theodicy of disprivilege ie a religious explanation and justification for their suffering.
Relative deprivation as an explanation for the growth of NRMs - Wallis
Relative deprivation is the subjective sense of being deprived compared to others. M/c people who are materially well off may feel spiritually deprived and so turn to sects as Wallis argues