Ontological argument Flashcards

1
Q

A priori argument

A

Gaining knowledge through conceptual truth and definitions instead of experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deductive reasoning

A

Using facts and logic to reach a conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contingent

A

The fact that everything (expect God) depends on something else to exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Necessary being

A

Something in which its existence is necessary. Aka God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Anselms original ontological argument

A

God is the greatest possible being by definition, and therefore in our heads.
It is greater to exist in reality than in the mind
If he is the greatest possible being in only our minds then a greater being can exist in reality.
Therefore he must exist in reality if he is the greatest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Analytic proposition

A

A statement which is true by definition - Anselm proposes that the phrase “God exists” is an analytic proposition as the concept of existence is part of the concept of God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Anselm quote

A

“The fool says in his heart ‘There is no God’ “

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Gaunilos criticism of Anslem

A

If we swapped the idea of God with an island, Anselm argument is illogical.
“The lost island”
Eg imagining the greatest possible island must mean that is exists in reality, as for it to be the greatest then it must exist.
This clearly is not true, Gaunilo states that using Anselms premises anything could be proved to exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anselms 2nd ontological argument

A

You can’t compare an island to God, as an island is a contingent being and God is a necessary being.
Existence isn’t a necessary part of an island, but it is for God
(Analytic statement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Descartes

A
  • God is a perfect being
  • A quality of perfection is existence
  • Therefore God must exist
  • Existence is a predicate of God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Kant

A
  • Disagrees with Descartes
  • Existence is not a predicate
  • To say something exists does not change its definition
  • 100 coins example : if your looking at 100 coins, your mind also sees 100 coins. Reality is the same as the mind.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Russel

A
  • Agrees with Kant/disagrees with the ontological argument
  • All ontological arguments are cases of bad grammar
  • Existence is not a predicate, they have made a linguistic mistake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aquinas

A
  • Disagrees with the ontological argument
  • Humans can’t fully know the essence of God using reason anyway
  • Instead we should focus on empirical evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dawkins

A
  • Disagrees with the ontological argument
  • Book “God delusion” states that “faith is the great excuse to evade the need to think and use evidence”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Platinga

A
  • Agrees with Anselm + ontological argument
  • Supports Anselm’s defence against Gaunillo as an island can be adapted and improved but God can’t be any greater
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pros of a priori arguments

A
  • Using reason is logical as you cannot fully trust the senses (for example, you can hear or see things which aren’t there)
  • Plato would agree
17
Q

Cons of a priori arguments

A
  • Empiricism means actual proof, which cannot happen in arguments supported by reason
18
Q

Analytical proposition

A

A statement which is true by definition
(Anselm = God exists)

19
Q

How does Malcolm interpret the greatest being?

A

God being unlimited, not dependent on anything else for existence. God has no limitation which could possibly cause God’s non-existence.

20
Q

How does Malcolm defend the ontological argument against Kant’s critique?

A

Malcolm argues that necessary existence is a defining quality of a necessary being, unlike contingent beings.

21
Q

What limitation does Malcolm’s argument have?

A

Malcolm only shows that God is a non-dependent being, not that God must exist; a non-dependent being could still not exist.

22
Q

Anselm’s painter analogy

A

A painter has an idea of a great painting in his mind, but once it has been painted it is even greater - this is because it exists in reality too.

23
Q

Bible quote which inspired Anselm

A

“The fool in his heart says there is no God”

24
Q

Anselm quote

A

“There is no doubt that there exist sa being, than which nothing greater can be conceived”