OCSE revision notes Flashcards
What is Exposure Index and range for uni x-ray tube?
Range of interest indicated by a green square surrounding the image
* Linear scale - proportional to exposure
* Normal EI range usually 250-350 (may vary depending on manufacturer)
Possible reasons for changes in Exposure Index?
Exposure field recognition error – doesn’t recognise area you have
exposed
* Unexpected material in field
* Collimation margins not detected
* Scatter
If EI is out of range:
what should you do
Look where green square is
* Look for distortion
* Look what DAP says
- If DAP is within range but EI is not, likely to be a processing error.
- If DAP not within range, could be an equipment fault. Note down
exposure factors used, DAP and EI, report to senior radiographer or RPS,
perform QA, take room out of action until issue resolved.
Radiographic Brightness
High density = low brightness, low density = high brightness.
Are you able to see trabecular patterns within the bone?
* Need to say how you would rectify it if the image is too bright or not
bright enough (e.g. windowing, repeats)
What affects Exposure
- Increasing kV and reducing mAs decreases absorbed dose, but not
always DAP (DAP measures the amount of radiation exiting the tube) - There are less x-ray photons so less of the photons produced are
absorbed by the patient - As we increase kV, the contrast decreases – algorithm has to work
harder to produce a diagnostic image, will lead to changes in EI - Both collimation and mAs have a proportional effect on DAP (as long as
no other changes are applied): - Double mAs = double DAP
- Half area of collimation = half DAP
How do you manage absorbed dose?
To maintain image quality, but managed absorbed dose, the following Rule of
10 should be used:
For every 10kVp increased, the mAs should be halved – gives the same overall
exposure and image quality, EI should stay the same, but DAP may change
How does AEC work
- The AEC determines the mAs of the exposure to produce an image with
optimal density. - mAs is pre-set but kV needs to be set.
- Time is the variable factor – determined by the exposure of an ionisation
chamber
Impact of changes with AECs
- Inaccurate centring – area over the detector may not have the same
density as correct anatomy/pathology - Incorrect detector – incorrect anatomy or pathology will be over the
detector, may not have the same density as the correct AOI - kVp too high/low – time will be changed as mAs will change accordingly
When increasing SID from 100cm to 180cm – double the exposure (add 10kV
and double your mAs)
Grids
- Stops scatter from reaching the IR (attenuates some of the primary
beam) but does not stop scatter from reaching the patient. - Consider using a grid for any area over 15cm in depth.
- Justify use of a grid every time – grids increase dose to the patient as
more mAs is needed with a grid than without. - Increase contrast due to less scatter on the IR.
Grid factor is usually 4. Assume this or ask your examiner, but state out loud
that you are assuming this.
Describing “normal”
Just stating ‘no bony injury’ without further detail is not enough for this exam
(possibly is in practice). You need to base your answer on the clinical history.
Some examples of descriptions of “normal”:
* No bony injury. The glenohumeral joint is congruent. The
acromioclavicular joint remains undisrupted.
* No bony injury. Normal bone, soft tissue and joint appearances.
* Normal appearances of heart, mediastinum and lungs. No evidence of
pneumothorax. normal bony anatomy (clinical history: stabbed in right
side of chest)
* Normal appearances of bone and soft tissue. No breaks in bony cortex or
abnormal lucent/opaque areas. Joints aligned normally
Adapted technique scenarios- Wider collimation than normal
say what the normal collimation should
be, say where the obvious deformity appears to be, increasing the AOI will
ensure that the fracture is fully demonstrated on the first image, hopefully
preventing need for repeats
Adapted technique scenarios- Addition (or removal) of a grid
larger volume of tissue being imaged,
increased amount of scatter produced, will adversely affect the resultant
image if a grid is not used
Adapted technique scenarios- angling of the tube
ensure perpendicular relationship between affected
body part and IR
Adapted technique scenarios- Larger SID
if IR cannot be placed in contact with the body part being
imaged, need to increase SID to account for increased magnification.
Standard SID for CXR is 180cm because the heart naturally has space
between it and the IR so need to reduce magnification.
Adapted technique scenarios- Placing affected body part on radiolucent pad
raises affected body part
enabling posterior/anterior aspect to be visualised on the IR