occupiers liability 1957 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the definition of occupiers liability?

A

section 1(1): damage arising from the state of the premises or things omitted to be done on them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who is occupiers liability 1957 for?

A

lawful visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an occupier?

A

Someone in control of a property
Wheat v Lacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a premises?

A

Section 1(3) land, building and fixed or moveable structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a lawful visitor?

A

Someone with a legal right to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a duty of care?

A

Section 2(2)
To take reasonable care to keep visitors safe for the purposes they are permitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is reasonable care?

A

Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway Supreme
Enough to show there is reasonable but not too extreme steps are needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must be there for children?

A

A higher standard of care
Section 3(a)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Children are at more risk

A

Moloney v Lambeth BC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Children and allurements

A

Glasgow corporation v Taylor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Parents and their expectations to supervise

A

Phipps v Rochester

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Use of exclusion clauses

A

Section 2(1) clauses are subject to UCTA rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Specialist visitors

A

Section 2(3)(b) they are expected to guard against risks associated with trade
Roles v Nathan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Warning signs

A

Section 2(4)(a) if a warning does enough in the circumstances to comply with the duty Rae v Mars Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Independent contractor

A

Section 2(4)(b) if damage caused by negligent work of independent contractor
•was it reasonable to hire a contractor
•was a competent contractor chosen
• was the work inspected if appropriate Haseldine v Daw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defences

A

S2(5) volenti
S2(3) contributory negligence

17
Q

Remedies

A

Damages for personal injury, property damage and consequential loss

18
Q

How can a lawful visitor become unlawful

A

Tomlinson v Congleton, the calgarth
Exceeding what they were limited to do on land