occupiers Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

occupiers liability act 1957

A

lawful visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

occupiers liability act 1984

A

tresspassers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

wheat v E Lacon

A

there can be more than one occupier on a premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bailey v arms

A

there can be no occupier of the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S1(3)(a) 1957 act definition of premises

A

a fixed or movable structure, including any vessel, vehicle and air craft. includes ladders and lifts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

lawful visitor

A

-a person with express or implied permission to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the calgarth

A

“a person who is invited to use the staircase is nit permitted to slide down the bannister”
-if a lawful visitor exceeds their permission they become a tresspasser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

duty owed under 1957 act

A

such care that it is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises in the purpose which they are invited to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

laverton v takeaway

A

care need to be reasonable not complete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

glasgow v taylor

A

example case of duty owed against children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

phipps v Rochester

A

really young children should be supervised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

roles v nathan

A

a worker will guard against any special risk so long as the occupier allows him to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hazeldine v Daw

A

it was reasonable for the occupier to give the work to an independent contractor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

bottomley v cricket club

A

contractor is competent to carry out task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

woodward v mayor of hastings

A

occupier checks work is properly done to the best of their abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Volenti

A

-complete defense
-need to know precise risk
-need to exercise free will
-voluntarily accept risk

17
Q

smiths v bakers and sons (volenti)

A

didnt voluntarily accept risk

18
Q

contributory negligence

A

-partial defense
-law reform act 1945: damages can be reduced according to the level of contribution by the claimant

19
Q

sayers v district council (contributory negligence )

A

occupier was liable but claimant contributed to own injury