Occupiers Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the use of the Occupier’s Liability Act 1957

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful visitors
Allows compensation for personal injuries and also damage to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the use of the Occupier’s Liability Act 1984

A

Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 deals with trespassers
Only refers to personal injuries, not damage to property
Occupier must’ve been aware of the danger
Age of trespasser is taken into consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Occupier’s Liability

A

A field of tort that involves reasonable or unreasonable visit to a piece of land whether it is lawful or trespassed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 2 Acts that deal with Occupiers Liability

A

Occupiers Liability Act 1984
Occupiers Liability Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the main remedy that is seeked by defendants in Occupiers Liability

A

Compensation (financial benefits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Occupier

A

No statutory definition for Occupier
Usually a person that owns a property, land etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define Lawful Visitor

A

A visitor to a property with permission
Usually contractual permission or statutory rights of entry (police etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What duty does an Occupier (owner) have to a lawful visitor

A

Occupier has a responsibility to make sure that the visitor is safe at a reasonable level when under their supervision/liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is there a significance when referring to care towards children

A
  • Children have much more limited minds in comparisons to adults
  • They may not have the development of making right and wrong decisions
  • Easily succeptible to Allurment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What exception allows the occupier to become not liable with a case with the involvement of a child

A

If the parent was in supervision fo the child and was not looking afte the child
Causing the child to wander off by themselves while under protection of someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is there no age limit on the word ‘child’

A

?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the liability occurance when a trade is taking place

A

If a tradesman is injured while under terms of trade, The occupier is liable as they owe them a duty of care
However the injury must be related to the source of trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What has the s 2(4) Act 1957 represented

A

It shows that a warning sign is insufficient when showing signs of danger
However if the danger is obvious, no addition sigsn are necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Exception to Liability of Occupier

A

No liability if the danger is obvious and the trespsser is an adult
If the occupier had no reason to suspect trespassers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Defences to be used against a trespasser

A

If the danger is presented very clearly
Consent is given to entire the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the only exception a trespasser can claim compensation for

A

Personal Injuries

17
Q

What is the difference between occupiers liability and general negligence

A

Occupiers liability deals with people in reasonable or unreasonable grounds of permission to be on a land, whereas general negligence refers to a general duty of care

18
Q

What is defined by ‘Real Property’

A

A generic term used to describe land that an occupier is incharge of

19
Q

Which case study shows a warning sign is not sufficient to prevent risk and explain what happened

A

English Heritage v Taylor (2016)
Facts: The deceased was visiting an English Heritage site; he was walking along a grass slope when he fell off the slope and into a dry moat causing serious injuries. There was no warning sign of the 12ft drop down to the moat.

Outcome: The sheer drop was an obvious danger and the defendant should have taken reasonable steps to protect visitors to the premises. English Heritage were in breach of their duty by failing to provide an adequate warning sign.

20
Q

What are the rules around liability where tradesmen and contractors are concerned

A

A tradesmen has a contract to work in a premises which must be done with protection and safeguarding from the contractor. If an injury takes place in the premises with no relation to work, the occupier is liable because the danger was not presented or foreseen. Whereas if it is in relatio to the trade of work, then the occupier is not liable

21
Q

What does the Jolley v Sutton Case show

A
22
Q

Explain the duty owed to a lawful visitor

A

When under protection of a contractual visit by the occupier, they must take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe when using the premises for the purposes for which they are invited or permitted by the occupier to be there

23
Q

When can the duty of a occupier be breached by a visitor

A
24
Q

Define Trespasser

A

Someone that enters a prohibited area under no contractual visit, or legal acceptance to be there