Occupational psychology Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does occupational psychology aim to do?

A

Improve effectiveness of organisations and the work performance within them, and also aims to improve the conditions and satisfaction of workers within organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by Taylorism?

A

How occupational psych began in the 1900s - awareness of the need to train workers to economical standards, with the main objective of improving economic efficiency, especially labor productivity.
Taylor believed that jobs could be analysed using time-and-motion studies, broken down into smallest actions as they were performed by the most efficient workers, and having found the most economical way of performing a job new workers could be trained to perform to this standard

Some of the principles of Taylorism include only rewarding workers with money (belief in tangible rewards as central motivators), and setting up procedures to prevent them from any deception/shirking (he believed workers to be selfish and untrustworthy, not desirous of responsibility)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the role of the Health of Munitions workers committee (1915)?

A

Looked at factors such as worker fatigue and health and how these interacted with work performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Rowntree’s first employed psychologist in 1922 believe?

A

Staff satisfaction could be enhanced by asking workers to join discussions on their work environment conditions - established as works council and factory psychological department
Unlike Taylor, emphasis was on considering worker’s thoughts, feelings, attitudes and job satisfaction alongside their physical condition and training needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the Hawthorne electrical plant study demonstrate?

A

Humans don’t just operate like machines but feelings, attitudes and social relations significantly impact on productivity (physical conditions and fatigue only part of the story)

THE HAWTHORNE EFFECT - changes in working conditions do improve productivity but are not responsible alone; interest and attention shown to workers is actually the principle driving factor in boosting productivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were 2 limitations of the Hawthorne study?

A

Supervisors and 2 participants actually changed mid-way
Feedback was provided to participants regarding their performance (this is not known to have a significant effect on worker motivation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 3 different categories of occupational psychology?

A

Human factors - ergonomics and design of environments and work i.e. healthy and safety concerns
Personnel psychology - recruitment (selection and assessment), performance appraisals, counselling, issues of equal opportunities and training in how to facilitate work performance
Organisational psychology - Leadership, motivation, employee relations and organisational development/change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 3 most important components of an organisation’s development plan?

A

Training needs analysis
Training design
Subsequent evaluation of training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 levels of the training needs analysis?

A

Organisational analysis - training needs develop as a result of introducing new developments/changes in an organisation, or recognising that an organisation is failing in some specific area
Task analysis - determines important elements in a job and the knowledge/skills/abilities needed to complete them; breaks a behaviour down into smaller and specific elements
Person analysis - individual training needs are often identified as managers conduct a performance review with their staff and usually those needs are ones which help the individual meet organisational goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the stage of training design involve?

A

Programmes to deliver training need to be assessed for effectiveness using clear and measurable objectives
Design needs to consider how people learn, so can be done from any of three perspectives:
Behavioural - assessing learning through measurable behaviours e.g. programmed instruction, breaking task into small units and individual follows instructions in a set order to learn how to do task
Social learning theory - behaviour modelling training where employees shown both appropriate and inappropriate work behaviours, observe the outcomes and then practise the observed task
Cognitive - trainees more likely to use trainer’s actions as information on how to get a task done rather than simply observing and copying behaviour; positive feedback is important in this approach, immediate rather than delayed, and more about actively improving behaviour than reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the preferred approach to training evaluation?

A

Experimental approach - control and experimental group, both of which have pre-test baseline measures taken, then experimental group has the training
Post-test to see if the training created a difference or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by Need theories of motivation?

A

For example, Maslow’s hierarchy and suggestion that we are motivated to satisfy needs at the base of the pyramid before moving to satisfy the higher levels - this has been heavily criticised and Rowan suggested there should also be a need for competence included in the hierarchy i.e. ability to master skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What has much empirical support been provided for in the context of need theories?

A

Those theories that look at very specific needs e.g. McClelland’s “Need for achievement”, arguably a personality variable which could be altered by life experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are rational theories of motivation?

A

Assume that humans are rational beings and make calculations about their work environments and from these deduce what level of motivation is appropriate
Equity and Expectancy theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by Equity theory?

A

Adams assumed people would feel discomfort when perceiving inequity (equity is a sense of fairness in the exchange of goods, services, time, and effort in working conditions) and would adjust behaviour i.e. productivity and output accordingly
For example, they might work less of they perceive others are being paid the same for less work; people are also more likely to work harder if they feel over-paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is expectancy theory?

A

Vroom argued that the motivation involved in a task is based on calculation of the probability that one will succeed at it, i.e. probability that success will bring rewards and how valuable such rewards will be
No chance of success/no reward –> no motivation

17
Q

What are the key implied messages of each of these rational theories?

A

EQUITY - ensure people get equal rewards for equivalent work, and the need to make it clear to workers what criteria are for judging such equivalence
EXPECTANCY - make sure workers know what task accomplishments will bring rewards, and make sure workers can perform those tasks

18
Q

What are job design theories of motivation?

A

Look at jobs themselves and see in what ways they can be designed to increase job satisfaction

19
Q

What did Herzberg suggest as the 2 components of job satisfaction?

A

Satisfaction - things that increase this are “motivators” e.g. responsibility and promotion
Dissatisfaction - things that increase this are “hygiene factors” e.g. absence of good supervision, good working conditions, salary etc

These 2 states are very different and not necessarily caused by same factors i.e. absence of hygiene factors is not the same as presence of motivators, and absence of motivators doesn’t automatically lead to dissatisfaction

20
Q

What is Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model and what are its 5 key characeristics?

A

Argues that core job characteristics lead to psych states which then impact on work outcomes and performance
Skill variety - range of tasks/skills involved in a job
Task identity - extent to which employees see a whole product of what they themselves do
Task significance - Impact their job has on others e.g. a manager’s job will have more significance than a secretary
Autonomy - Degree of independence
Feedback - Workers need to be able to tell from what happens in their job how well they are doing

First 3 characteristics are thought to be particularly important influences on how meaningful we find our job

21
Q

What is meant by Job Enrichment?

A

Job redesign initiatives stimulated by job design theories, in which employers attempt to increase satisfaction and motivation by increasing levels of core job characteristics
These aims can be achieved through initiatives such as job rotation and semi-autonomous working groups where small groups are allowed to organise themselves and make own decisions in accomplishing a wider set of tasks
Problems occur where we see job ENLARGEMENT i.e. more work for same pay

22
Q

What is meant by Goal Setting Theory?

A

Difficult goals lead to higher performance than easier ones, but there are several conditions to this:
Workers need CLEAR AND SPECIFIC goals not simply general ones
Goals must be reachable with a clear route
Workers must be COMMITTED to the goals
Feedback on performance is necessary if goals are difficult and specific to show their benefits

This idea runs contrary to expectancy theory which would predict greater motivation from a goal that is easier to achieve

23
Q

When does specific goal setting seem less effective?

A

When task is new/complex, where no previous strategy exists for performing it and we essentially have to learn the task
In such circumstances general goals seem more effective

24
Q

What are key differences between managers and leaders?

A

Managers motivate people to achieve stated organisational goals, implement plans, narrow down horizons, behave rationally, does things “right”, behaves in a transactional manner and is concerned with the means to ends e.g. responsibility, fairness
Leaders motivate people to develop NEW OBJECTIVES, shape plans, open up horizons, behaves emotionally, does the right thing and is concerned with ends e.g. the future direction of an organisation

We can often consider managers as leaders but rarely consider leaders to be managers; one key difference is that managers are APPOINTED and get their authority from their assigned role, while leaders get their power from LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY i.e. they earn the respect of others through their own performance

25
Q

What is a problem with studies which have looked at leadership qualities?

A

Problematic as largely correlational e.g. does self confidence produce good leadership or v.v.
Because of difficulty in marking out specific CHARACTERISTICS defining leaders, focus has turned to BEHAVIOURS exhibited e.g. Lewin found that no one leadership style produced the best results, it is dependent on the group being led

26
Q

What did the Ohio and Michigan Groups find?

A

OHIO - structured leaders associated with better job performance, while leaders high on consideration (i.e. respectful and trusting) produced greater satisfaction
MICHIGAN - effective managers demonstrated more relationship-oriented behaviour while non-effective leaders were more task-oriented

27
Q

What perspective is taken by continency theories of leadership?

A

In some situations it may be better to be task-oriented e.g. in an emergency, while in others it may be better to be person-oriented
Argue that best leadership occurs when leadership behaviour is CONTINGENT UPON the specific situation, not a rigid and inflexible preference for one style

28
Q

What was Fiedler’s contingency theory?

A

Basic dimensions of task and person orientation fixed in an individual, two ends of a single dimension (being high on one means being low on the other)
Invented an indirect measure to assess degree to which a person was either end of the spectrum - called the LEAST PREFERRED CO-WORKER measure

29
Q

What is Fiedler’s least preferred co-worker measure?

A

Asks test taker to select the worker whom they found it most awkward to work with (NOT simply their least liked)
If test taker assessed this worker quite harshly (Low LPC score), it was assumed they had a task orientation while a forgiving and understanding assessment (high LPC score) indicated person orientation

30
Q

What was a second component of Fiedler’s theory?

A

Considered the interaction between the two leadership behaviour patterns and specifics of task situations - identified 3 key aspects of work situations that, depending on leadership type, would make the situation favourable or unfavourable to the leader:
Leader-member relations - high when members like and trust their leader
Task structure - degree to which task goals and procedures for reaching them are well-defined
Position power - degree to which leader holds authority e.g. in the form of ability to reward or discipline

We get 8 possible combinations of measures of these situational variables (each can be scored high or low)

31
Q

What did Fiedler find regarding how the two extreme leadership styles interact with the 8 possible combinations of situation variables?

A

Where a situation is very favourable/unfavourable, a more task-oriented leader (LOW LPC) is appropriate - interpersonal relations are already high so no need to work on these and all impetus can be on getting job done
Where favourability is more middling, nurturing good relations can keep team members motivated towards task so high-LPC leader preferred

32
Q

What is Fiedler’s cognitive resonance theory?

A

Developed out of his original contingency theory, this now includes the interaction of a leader’s own intelligence and experience, along with stress generated by leadership roles themselves
Stress makes us think less clearly and act out of old habits, hence more experienced leaders should be able to do better under stress