Observational techniques Flashcards
Observational techniques
List
Naturalistic observation Controlled observation Covert observation Overt observation Participant observations Non-participant observations
Naturalistic observation
-watching and recording behaviour in a setting in which it would normally (NATURALLY) occur
Naturalistic observation
Evaluation
Strengths -high mundane realism └as represents real-life experiences -good generalizability └=high external validity
Limitations -low control └difficult to replicate -doesn’t control extraneous variables └=more difficult to judge pattern of behaviour
Controlled observation
-watching and recording behaviour in a structured environment
└where some variables are managed
Controlled observation
Evaluation
Strengths -high control └easy to replicate -controls extraneous variables └=easier to judge pattern of behaviour
Limitations -low mundane realism └as doesn’t represent real-life experiences -low generalizability └=low external validity
Covert observation
-participants behaviour is watched and recorded WITHOUT their knowledge and consent
Covert observation
Evaluation
Strengths
-participants don’t know they are being watched
└=natural behaviour
└increases validity
Limitations
-ethical issues
└no informed consent
Overt observation
-participants behaviour is watched and recorded WITH their knowledge and consent
Overt observation
Evaluation
Strengths
-less ethical issues
└informed consent
Limitations
-participants know they are being watched
└=not natural behaviour
└decreases validity
Participant observations
-the researcher becomes a member if the group whose behaviour is they are watching and recording
Participant observations
Evaluation
Strengths
-researcher experiences same situation as participants= extra insight
└increases validity
Limitations
-might identify with participants and not be objective (‘going native’)
Non-participant observations
-the researcher remains outside the group whose behaviour is they are watching and recording
Non-participant observations
Evaluation
Strengths
-can’t identify with participants and not be objective (‘going native’)
Limitations
-researcher doesn’t experience same situation as participants= less insight
└decreases validity