Objective 5 - Statement of Actuarial Opinion Flashcards
Sources of requirements and guidance for setting reserves
- State laws and regulations - these often prescribe certain requirements for calculating reserves or particular language to include in the actuarial opinion
- NAIC Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual - is intended to be used in situations where state regulations are silent (SSAPs 54, 55, 84)
- NAIC annual statement instructions - these specify what should be included in various annual statement line items. The health instructions also include standard wording for the actuarial opinion.
- ASOPs (5, 22,28, 42, 45)
- Health Reserves Guidance Manual - is intended to assist actuaries that estimate reserves and examiners who review the financial statements (covers claim reserves, contract reserves, provider liabilities & PDRs)
- Actuarial practice notes - developed to provide information on current practices in new and developing areas. They are not binding on any actuary.
NAIC model laws for reserving
- The Standard Valuation Law
- The Actuarial Opinion and Memorandum Regulation - specifies language for actuarial opinion and the need for asset adequacy analysis
- The Minimum Life and Annuity Reserve Standards
- The Health Insurance Reserves Model Regulation - for claim reserves, premium reserves, and contract reserves
Standard wording for the actuarial opinion in the health insurance annual statement
- Identification paragraph - identifies the actuary and his or her relation to the company
- Scope paragraph - identifies the liabilities on which an opinion is to be expressed
- Opinion paragraph - states that it is the actuary’s opinion that the liabilities on the balance sheet:
a. Are in accordance with accepted actuarial standards and sound actuarial principles
b. Are based on relevant and appropriate actuarial assumptions
c. Meet the requirements of the state laws
d. Make good and sufficient provision for all actuarial liabilities of the organization
e. Are computed based on assumptions that are consistent with the prior year’s assumptions
f. Include appropriate provision for all actuarial items that ought to be established - Statement in the opinion paragraph that:
a. The Underwriting and Investment Exhibit - Part 2B was prepared in accordance with ASOP #5
b. The methods, considerations, and analyses used in forming the opinion conform to the relevant ASOPs
Major small group rating requirements from the NAIC Small Employer Health Insurance Availability Model Act
- Certain case characteristics are recognized as allowable rating factors (see separate list). This means they are not subject to the following premium range limitation tests.
- Index rate
a. The average of the base premium rate (the lowest rate that could be charged) and the corresponding highest premium rate
b. Calculated only after all rates have been adjusted for all allowable case characteristics and benefit design variations - Rating restrictions between classes - the rating differential between classes is limited to 20% between the lowest and highest class index rates
- Rating restrictions within a class of business - the premium rates charged to different groups within a given class cannot vary from that class’ index rate by more than 25%
- Rate increase limit for a given group - the increase is limited to the sum of the following:
a. The percentage change in the new business rate from the prior to the new rating period
b. 15% annually for experience
c. Adjustment due to change in coverage or case characteristics
Post-ACA, rating must be on a pooled basis without variation except for allowable characteristics; classes will be eliminated; small group will be those groups with 2-100 employees; all small group rate increases must be filed in each affected state; and 80% MLR will be implemented.
Allowable case characteristics under the NAIC small group model act
- Age
- Gender
- Geographic area
- Family composition
- Group size (maximum of 20% from highest to lowest)
- Industry (maximum of 15% from highest to lowest
- Other characteristics, with commissioner’s prior approval
ACA limits characteristics to plan design, provider network, age, family composition, geographic area, and tobacco use.
Information needed for reviewing and certifying small group rates
- The small group rate manuals used during the rating period being reviewed
- The small group rate manuals used during the prior period
- The policy and certificate forms used for the business
- Listing of groups in formce during the testing period, and the following for each group:
a. Rates charged in the current and prior period
b. Group size
c. The value of allowable case characteristics
d. The value of any change in benefit from the previous year - Depending on the type of certification required, may also need:
a. Loss ratio and claim experience reports
b. Sales brochures and other solicitation materials
c. Description of the underwriting procedures
d. Underwriting results for each new group
e. Marketing materials
f. Underwriting manual
What to read, think, write in preparing a Statement of Actuarial Opinion
- Read what the statement actually says, as well as applicable standards of practice and other guidelines
- Think about what you are signing, and whether you can really make those statements
- Write what you actually think, rather than signing the standard language if you don’t believe it to be true
Approaches for signing the Statement of Actuarial Opinion when reserves are too high or too low
- Issue a qualified opinion - be straightforward in laying out the concerns, and then state the actuarial opinion with those exceptions noted
- Convince management to change the reserves to an appropriate level
- If other options fail, notify management that you must sign an opinion stating that reserves are inadequate - this decision cannot be taken lightly, since you will probably lose your job as a result
Definition and examples of statements of actuarial opinion (SAOs)
- Definition - an opinion expressed by an actuary in the course of performing actuarial services and intended by that actuary to be relied upon by the person or organization to which the opinion is addressed
- Examples of SAOs - annual statement opinion, rate filing opinion, actuarial appraisal, expert testimony, loss reserve opinion, asset adequacy analysis, and pricing opinion
- May contain SAOs - speech, phone conversation, and congressional testimony
- Not SAOs when used alone - experience study and personal computer program
- Not SAOs - draft of an actuarial report not provided to a client, letters to the editor, and interview by the media
Qualification Standards for US actuaries
- All actuaries issuing SAOs in the US must meet the Qualification Standards
- The General Qualification Standard applies to most SAOs and requires the following:
a. Basic education and experience requirement - must be a member of the Academy or similar organization, have 3 years of responsible actuarial experience, and be knowledgeable of applicable law (additional requirements apply for issuing SAOs in a specialty track)
b. Continuing education requirements - must complete 30 hours each calendar year of relevant continuing education, consisting of at least 3 hours on professionalism, at least 6 hours of organized activities, and no more than 3 hours of general business courses - For actuaries issuing SAOs for annual statements, Specific Qualification Standards also apply. These include basic education on specific topics, such as statutory accounting and reserving, and 15 hours of continuing education that is directly relevant to the subject of the SAO.
Purposes of actuarial standards of practice
- To offer guidance and provide a framework for performing work - ASOPs do not dictate a single approach or mandate a particular outcome
- To be used by qualified actuaries - others should obtain the advice of a qualified actuary before relying on ASOPs
- To be principles-based and leave room for the actuary to use professional judgment - ASOPs do not attempt to dictate every step and decision in an actuarial assignment
- Not to shift the burden of proof in litigation - failure to satisfy an ASOP provision should not, in and of itself, be presumed to be malpractice
Compliance with ASOPs
- Actuaries are required by the Code of Professional Conduct to ensure that work performed by them or under their direction satisfies applicable ASOPs
- Actuaries are expected to take a good faith approach in applying ASOPs, exercising good judgment and common sense
- Actuaries should observe those ASOPs that are relevant to the task at hand.
- Actuaries are expected to use professional judgment, exercise reason, and perform certain tasks only if practical.
- It may be appropriate for the actuary to deviate from an ASOP’s provisions if it is done in a manner described in the ASOP or if a law, regulation, or other binding authority requires such a deviation.
List of all ASOPs and their purpose
- ASOP #5 - Incurred Health and Disability Claims - preparing or reviewing financial reports, claims studies, rates, and actuarial communications involving incurred claims under a health benefit plan; covers total health and disability claims and includes LTC products. Methods for estimating incurred claims are also covered in Objective 4.
- ASOP #7 - Analysis of Life, Health, or Property/Casualty Insurer Cash Flows - performing cash flow analysis
- ASOP #8 - Regulatory Filings for Health Plan Entities - preparation and review of regulatory filings for health plan entities for new and existing plans; applies to rate or benefit filings and projection filings
- ASOP #12 - Risk Classification - designing, reviewing, or changing risk classification systems involving classifying individuals or entities into groups intended to reflect relative likelihood of expected outcomes
- ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries
- ASOP #19 - Appraisals of Casualty, Health, and Life Insurance Business
- ASOP #21 - Responding to or Assisting Auditors or Examiners in Connection with Financial Statements - applies to responding actuaries and reviewing actuaries
- ASOP #22 - Statements of Opinion Based on Asset Adequacy Analysis by Actuaries for Life or Health Insurers
- ASOP #23 - Data Quality - selecting data, relying on data supplied by others, reviewing data, using data, and making appropriate disclosures regarding data quality; applies to all actuaries in all practice areas
- ASOP #25 - Credibility Procedures Applicable to Accident and Health, Group Term Life, and P&C Coverages - selection of a credibility procedure and assignment of credibility values
- ASOP #26 - Compliance with Requirements for the Actuarial Certification of Small Employer Health Benefit Plans - actuarial certification stating that the rating methods and other actuarial practices comply with regulatory requirements
- ASOP #28 - Statements of Actuarial Opinion Regarding Health Insurance Liabilities and Assets - issuing SAOs regarding health insurance, reinsurance, or other health insurance financing systems to comply with law, regulation, or contractual obligations
- ASOP #41 - Actuarial Communications - does not apply to communications that do not include and actuarial opinion or other actuarial findings
- ASOP #42 - Determining Health and Disability Liabilities other than Liabilities for Incurred Claims - applies to health benefit plans, risk-sharing arrangements, and self-insured plans; considerations for determining premium deficiency reserves are discussed in Objective 5
- ASOP # 45 - The Use of Health Status Based Risk Adjustment Methodologies - used to quantify differences in morbidity across organizations, populations, programs and time periods; does not apply to risk adjustment models
Master list of communications/disclosures and data quality
- Communication, disclosure, and documentation
a. The scope, purpose of analysis, and intended users
b. Assumptions and methods are in compliance with ASOPs 41 and 23
c. Sensitivity of work to the assumptions
d. Changes from prior analysis
e. Sources of data
f. Whether relied on other sources and disclaim responsibility
g. Effects of adverse selection and recommendations to mitigate impact
h. Limitations
i. Unresolved concerns
j. Retain for a reasonable period of time
k. Sufficient clarity that another actuary qualified in the same area could evaluate reasonableness
l. Be prepared to justify different procedures if deviated from this ASOP
m. Components prescribed by law
n. Departures from industry practices - Data quality
a. Refer to ASOP 23
b. Sources are: accounting systems and other internal systems, claim and utilization data, medical records and patient reported data, population exposure, consulting firms, state administered data
ASOP considerations for estimating incurred claims
- Plan provisions and business practices - reflect practices that materially affect the cost, frequency, or severity of claims
- Economic influences - such as unemployment levels, cost shifting, and catastrophic events
- Organizational claims administration - lag factors may vary due to staffing levels, computer system changes, or seasonal backlogs
- Risk characteristics and organizational practices by block of business - consider the effects of marketing and underwriting on the types of risks accepted
- Legislative requirements - consider how regulations mandating benefits, risk characteristics, rating, reserving, and underwriting practices can affect incurred claims
- Carve outs - consider the effect of carved-out benefits on incurred claim levels
- Special considerations for long term products - such as cost of living adjustments and inflation effects
Incurred claims = paid claims + estimate of unpaid claims liabilities at the end of the valuation period - estimate of unpaid claims at the end of the prior valuation period
Purposes of cash flow analysis
- Determination of reserve adequacy
- Determination of capital adequacy
- Product development or ratemaking studies
- Evaluations of investment strategy
- Financial projections or forecasts
- Actuarial appraisals
- Testing of future benefits that may vary at the discretion of the insurer (such as dividend scales)
When to do cash flow testing
- Situations where cash flow testing is needed:
a. Where there are material asset risks (aka credit risk)
b. Where there are liabilities that have cash flows far out into the future
c. Where a company has a new or rapidly growing line of business
d. Where policyholder options are likely to result in antiselection - Situations where cash flow testing is not needed:
a. Products with short-term liabilities supported by short-term assets
b. Business that is not sensitive to changes in economic conditions or interest rates
c. If the risk being evaluated is unanticipated sources of significant claims (ex: AIDS and asbestos)