Objective 2 - Manual Rates Flashcards
Components of gross premiums
- Claim costs
- Administrative expenses - includes the costs of deigning, developing, underwriting, and administering the product, as well as an allocation of overhead costs. Frequently much higher in the first year than in renewal years.
- Commissions and other sales expenses - include special bonuses, incentives, and advertising. Generally expressed as a percentage of premium.
- Premium tax
- Other taxes and assessments - includes federal and state income taxes and new assessments due to the ACA
- Risk and profit charges - depends on the degree of risk involved, the amount of capital allocated to support the product, and the expected return on the capital
- Investment earnings - typically credited based on assets held
Considerations in developing administrative expense assumptions
- How expenses are allocated to the product - allocation methods include
a) Activity based allocation - distributes expenses according to some measure of use (eg. actual postage expenses can be charged to the function that generated the mail)
b) Functional expense allocation - determines how expenses are split by line of business for new and renewal business (done by surveying employees to determine how time is spent)
c) Multiple allocation methods - a combination of the other two methods - How administrative expenses should be allocated to groups - should differentiate between first year and renewal expenses. Various allocation bases exist (see separate list)
- What the competition includes as expenses in its pricing - adjustment may be needed to match what others are doing in the marketplace
Types of bases used for allocating expenses
- Percent of premium
- Percent of claims
- Per policy
- Per employee (certificate)
- Per claim administered
- Per case (some expenses are charged directly to the case for very demanding groups)
Common rating characteristics included in manual rates for group health insurance
- Age
- Gender
- Health status
- Rating tiers (see separate list)
- Geographic factors
- Industry codes
- Group size
- Length of the premium period
Common rating tiers for group health insurance
- One tier: composite
- Two tier: employee only, family
- Three tier: employee only, employee and one dependent, family
- Four tier: employee only, employee with one dependent, employee with children, family
- Five tier: employee only, couple, employee with child, employee with children, family
Considerations in developing a manual table for life insurance
- Two approaches can be used:
a) Manual premium tables - calculate the manual premium rate, then adjust for group size. This adjustment will reflect the margin, profit, and expenses appropriate for the group size, relative to the averages built into the table
b) Manual claim tables - calculate the manual claim rate, then add the appropriate margin, profit, and expenses - Data sources - could use SOA studies, industry mortality tables, population statistics, or own company experience (which is the best source, if credible)
- Changes in mortality - expected future mortality improvement should be reflected
- Reinsurance - the net cost of reinsurance should be factored into the claim table or expenses
- Conversions to individual life policies - these create severe antiselection, which should be reflected in the manual rates
- Manual adjustments are made for group-specific traits (see separate list)
- Rates for the group are based on age and gender mix, but groups typically end up charging a composite rate to all employees
Uses of general population data for pricing life insurance
- Estimating annual improvements in mortality
- Determining ratios of mortality by age bracket
- Comparing male and female mortality
- Developing rates for the non-working population (the very young and the very old)
Manual claim table adjustments for group life
(could also be referred to as group rating characteristics for life insurance)
- Disability factors - an adjustment is needed if a group has a different waiver of premium approach than is assumed in the manual rates
- Effective date adjustment - an adjustment is needed if the central date of coverage is not July 1
- Industry factors - usually based on SIC codes
- Regional factors
- Lifestyle factors - eg. adjustments based on the percentage of employees that smoke
- Marketing considerations - eg. added charges for rate guarantees
- Contribution schedules - eg. a 5% discount if the employer pays the entire premium (since that reduces antiselection)
- Case size factors and volume adjustments - largest groups may have lower mortality or expenses
- Plan options - optional benefits and allowing lots of employee choices will create antiselection
Types of living benefits for life insurance
This benefit (also called accelerated death benefits) pays a portion of the face amount prior to death, with the remaining benefit paid at death
- LTC benefits - provides a monthly benefit of 2% of the face amount, beginning when the insured is permanently confined to a nursing home
- Critical illness benefits - typically pays 25% of the face amount upon the occurrence of a listed disease, such as stroke or cancer
- Terminal illness benefit - pays 25% to 50% of the face amount when the insured has been diagnosed with a terminal illness with less than 6 (or 12) months to live
Steps for developing claim costs for use in a rate manual
- Collect data - data should be collected for a period of at least 12 months (to avoid seasonality issues). The best source of data is a company’s own experience
- Normalize the data for important rating variables (see separate list)
- Project experience period costs to the rating period - claim costs need to be trended from the experience period to the rating period
Important rating variables when normalizing data for use in the rate manual
- Age and gender - it may be appropriate to have separate age and gender factors for different major service categories or different plan types (such as HDHPs)
- Geographic area - the data should be adjusted to reflect one specific geographic area
- Benefit plan - adjust the data to reflect a common benefit plan (commonly the richest plan)
- Group characteristics - the manual rate should represent the “average group” with respect to group characteristics, sucha as industry and group size
- Utilization management programs - adjust for any changes in these programs
- Provider reimbursement arrangements - adjust for any changes in provider arrangements
- Other risk adjusters (based primarily on claim, diagnosis, encounter, and pharmacy data) - these may eventually become the primary method of risk adjustment
Methods of adjusting manual rates for specific benefit plans
- Claim probability distributions - these are typically used to estimate the impact on claim costs of deductibles, coinsurance, out-of-pocket maximums, and annual benefit maximums
- Actuarial cost models - these models build estimated total claim costs by developing a net claim cost (after member cost sharing) for each detailed type of services and summing to get the total
Data sources for estimating disability claim costs
- A company’s own data is the best source if the data is reliable and credible
- Rate filings of competitors
- Research of governmental and business publications
- Data from consulting firms and reinsurers
- Insurer studies - such as loss ratio studies and actual to expected incidence or termination rates
- Industry data and tables (typically base on intercompany experience studies
a) 1987 Commissioners Group Disability Table - adopted by the NAIC as the statutory minimum reserve basis for LTD
b) SOA 2000 Basic Experience Table - from studies performed during the 1990s
c) TSA reports - contain exposure and actual to tabular ratios by industry classification
d) 1985 Commissioners Individual Disability Table A (1985 CIDA) - is the basis of active life reserves and claim reserves for individual policies
e) SOA Individual Disability Experience Committee 1990-1999 study
Types of disability income experience studies
- Calendar year loss ratio study
a) Compute the ratio of incurred claims to earned premium for a given calendar year
b) Incurred claims are calculated as paid claims plus the increase in claim reserves
c) May not provide a clear picture of historical trends because results may be affected by reserve changes - Incurral year loss ratio study
a) Compute the ratio of incurred claims to earned premium for a given incurral year
b) Incurred claims are calculated as the present value of claim payments made to date plus the present value of the current claim reserve
c) Shows historical trends because the full cost of a claim is attributed to the year the claim was incurred - Study of actual-to-expected incidence or termination rate - ratios of a company’s actual claim incidence or termination rates compared to expected rates from published industry tables or company data
Formula for disability income net monthly premium
- Net monthly premium = IncidenceRate * SUM(Benefit * Continuance * InterestDiscount)
- The summation runs for the entire length of the benefit period
(offsets will also need to be reflected, discussed in a different list)
Group characteristics that impact disability income claim costs
- Age and gender
- Occupation - may need to adjust claim costs for:
a) Hourly vs. salaried
b) Blue collar vs. grey collar vs. white collar
c) Union vs. non-union
d) Commissioned sales personnel - Industry - for group insurance, it is more appropriate to rate based on industry than on occupations
- Average earnings per employee - claim rates decrease as average earnings increase
- Area - claim costs vary due to the legal environment and the general attitude and culture of the area
- Size of group - claim costs follow a “U” shaped curve, with higher costs for the largest and smallest employers
Data sources for developing dental claim costs
- Own company data (best source)
- Outside databases - Prevailing Health Care Charges System, MDR Payment System, National Dental Advisory Service, ADA “Survey of Dental Fees”
- Consulting firms (have manuals containing utilization data)
- Rate filings of other carriers
- Third party administrators
- Reinsurers
Plan characteristics that impact dental claim costs
- Covered benefits - plans often have a missing tooth provision and limit the replacement of dentures to once every 5-7 years
- Cost sharing provisions - these provisions are important because receiving proper dental care is very elective from the insured’s point of view. Provisions include deductibles, coinsurance and copays, and maximum limits
- Waiting period - used to discourage individuals from enrolling for one year to treat significant dental problems and then dropping coverage
- Period of coverage - will need to project past experience into the future. Dental trend should not be assumed to be the same as medical trend.
Network and care management practices that impact dental claim costs
- Provider reimbursement levels
a) FFS reimbursement may be based on usual, customary, and reasonable levels (UCR)
b) PPO networks contract for reduced fees from a limited number of dentists. The dentist may not bill above those levels.
c) Capitation is common with dental HMO plans - Care management practices - these will depend on the reimbursement method used. Practices include preauthorization and self-management (for capitated providers)
Insured characteristics that impact dental claim costs
- Age and gender - adults have higher costs than children, females have higher costs than males
- Geographic area - can be a significant factor
- Group size - smaller groups can have higher costs (due to adverse selection)
- Prior coverage and pre-announcement - groups without prior coverage will have high costs in the first year due to utilization by those who had put off having dental work done. If the plan is announced many months prior to becoming effective, this problem becomes even worse
- Employee turnover - high turnover increases cost since some new employees didn’t have prior coverage
- Occupation or income - entertainers, professionals, and groups who are more aware of their benefits have higher costs
- Contribution and participation - groups with less that 100% participation will have higher costs due to antiselection. The level of participation is inversely related to the required contribution level.
Major effects of the year 2000 changes in the NAIC LTC Model Act
- Requires disclosure of rating practices at the time of application - eg. including a statement that the policy may be subject to future rate increases
- Requires an actuarial certification at the time of initial rating - must include a statement that the initial rates are sufficient to cover anticipated costs under moderately adverse experience
- Eliminates minimum loss ratio requirements in the initial rate filing
- Places limits on expense allowances in the event of a rate increase - if a rate increase is required, the lifetime loss ratio must not be less than the weighted average of 58% of the initial premium and 85% of the premium increase
- Requires reimbursement of unnecessary rate increases - this could result if the revised premium schedules are more than double the initial rates
- For policies in a rate spiral, guarantees policyholders the right to switch to currently-sold insurance without underwriting
- Authorizes the commissioner to ban companies for 5 years if they persist in filing inadequate initial premiums
Major effects of HIPPA on LTC
- Defined qualified plans
- Clarified taxation of premium and benefits - established that a qualified LTC insurance contract shall be treated as an accident and health insurance contract for tax purposes
- Standardized benefit triggers (see separate list of benefit triggers)
- Allowed tax reserves to be calculated on a one-year preliminary term basis for tax-qualified plans
Major stakeholders in the group LTC policy design process
- Employer group
a) LTC is appealing because it complements other products (such as disability and life coverages) and relative to medical is a low-cost benefit with stable pricing
b) May not be able to offer guaranteed issue to all active employees, since this could make the premium more expensive than similar individual policies - Insurance company
a) Concerned with up-front acquisition costs, the risk of low enrollment, and the need to sell to both the employer and employee
b) Costs vary significantly by participation level, making this a key assumption - Employees
a) May not yet be aware of the risk covered by LTC insurance
b) Concerned with the significant cost, which may even exceed the cost of individual policies - Insurance brokers - have found that group LTC insurance provides the opportunity to open the door to competitive life and disability markets
Assumptions needed for a LTC pricing model
- Voluntary lapses - lapse rates are much lower than for other types of health insurance. Premium are very sensitive to changes in lapse assumptions, especially for products with inflation protection
- Mortality - most companies use the 1994 Group Annuitant Mortality (‘94 GAM) table. Selection factors may be needed if underwriting is good.
- Morbidity - the major variables that impact claim costs are:
a) Marital status - costs are lower for married individuals because of the presence of a potential caregiver at home
b) Gender - females have significantly higher ultimate costs than males
c) Benefit trigger
d) Area - utilization patterns of LTC services vary by geographic area
e) Case management - companies using a case manager usually experience lower claims - Selection factors - to reflect underwriting wear-off. Depends on the level of UW performed.
- Expenses - start-up expenses are high relative to other types of business
- Interest - the investment rate on assets is a key assumption because of the large amount of reserves
- Reserve basis - important considerations include the level of margins and how these margins are achieved
- Other assumptions - including the average daily benefit and the premium mode
- Profit - typically based on lifetime goals for pre-tax profits, post-tax profits, return on investments, or return on equity
Reasons for experience rating
- Groups want it - at least those with good experience want the premium to reflect it
- The insurer wants to quote and charge premiums that are as competitive as possible
- The insurer wants to avoid antiselection (good groups are going to competitors and bad groups staying)
Theoretical considerations in determining credibility levels
- Coverages with low claim frequency are more volatile and will require a larger exposure base to be credible
- Coverages with widely varying claim sizes will tend to be more volatile
- The statistical confidence interval chosen by the insurer
- Historically, statistical fluctuation was considered to vary inversely with the square root of the number of claims or lives. So it will take 4 times the exposure to double the credibility
- For coverages with stochastically independent claims, longer experience periods can be used to increase exposure and therefore credibility
Practical considerations in determining credibility levels
- Competitive pressures
- Ability of administrative and management areas to cope with experience rating
- The trade off between the cost of experience rating and gains in the quantity and quality of new business
- The effect on existing business of a change in credibility level
- Management philosophy regarding experience rating
- The need for consistency among classes of business
Steps in prospective experience rating
- Develop past claim experience - should be incurred claims for an experience year (restated)
- Use pooling methods (see separate list) to dampen random statistical fluctuation
- Calculate net premium (expected claim cost)
a) Calculate a historical claim cost per unit of exposure
b) Trend the historical experience to account for changes in claim costs - may be due to changes in morbidity, mortality, demographics, benefits, or antiselection - Calculate gross rates from net rates - apply loadings (retention) to the net premium (see separate list)
- A final adjustment may be required when dealing with a politically-sensitive policyholder. Be sure to know the financial impact of any changes
- Plan choice considerations - when employees can choose between an HMO, PPO, and/or indemnity, there is often antiselection against the indemnity plan
- Small group considerations - need to recognize experience to some degree. May use one of the following:
a) Formula-based methods (for groups with at least 10 lives) - a group is initially assigned to a rate class then reassigned at renewal if experience differs from a specified amount
b) Re-underwriting method - look at outlier cases to see causes of bad experience to determine prospective rates
Pooling methods
(regardless of the method chosen, a pooling charge must be applied to all groups being pooled to offset the average cost of claim modifications made during the pooling process)
- Catastrophic claim pooling - forgive large claims
- Loss ratio or rate increase limits - put a cap on one of the following: the loss ratio used in pricing, the rate increase proposed, or the aggregate claim dollars a group will be charged
- Credibility weighting - weight with the experienced incurred claims for the entire pool
- Multi-year averaging - combine several years of experience (may give more weight to recent years)
- Combination methods - for example, use both catastrophic claim pooling and a rate increase cap