obedience: social impact theory Flashcards

1
Q

who came up with the idea of social impact theory?

A

Latane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define what is meant by ‘social impact’

A

This refers only to the effect that real or imagined people can have on our behaviour. The person doing the influencing is the ‘influence’ and the people who are influenced are the ‘targets’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three social forces?

A

Strength, immediacy, and numbers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is social force created?

A

It’s generated by persuasion, threat, humour, embarrassment and other influences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define strength in SIMPT

A

How much power you believe the person influencing you has. For example, if the person has rank in an organisation, their orders will have more strength.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define immediacy in SIMPT

A

How recent the influence is and how close to you, from an order a minute ago from you boss standing right next to you (very immediate) to an email you received from your boss last week (not very immediate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define numbers in SIMPT

A

The more people who put pressure on you to do something, the more social force they will have. For example, in Milgram’s study and variations he found that obedience was lower when the authority figure was absent (#7) or was perceived to have less strength (#13). Latane also suggests a mathematical equation to work out social impact (i) in situations, i = f (SIN) where S, I, and N are strength, immediacy and numbers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by psychosocial law?

A

The idea that the first source of influence has the most dramatic impact on people, but that the second, third, fourth, etc sources generate less and less social force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is meant by the divisions of impact?

A

Social force is spread out between all the people it is directed at. If all the force is directed at a single person, that puts a huge pressure on them to conform or obey. By if the force is directed at two people, they only experience half as much pressure each (diffusion of responsibility: feeling less personal responsibility when there are multiple people). Latane’s equation for this: i = f (1/SIN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two types of impact?

A

Multiplication of impact and division of impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is meant by multiplication of impact?

A

The size of the sources indicates the strength of the source. The closeness to the target indicates immediacy. The number of rings around target shows the amount of influence exerted. All created by the three social forces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by division of impact?

A

The source has reduced effect because the impact is now divided between several targets. The closer the tiger to the source, the less influence because of the target’s impact on the source.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Supporting evidence of SIMPT: Bassett & Latane

A

They found that participants would assign nearby fictitious vents in a newspaper more columns inches than faraway events, supporting immediacy as a factor affecting obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Supporting evidence of SIMPT: Milgram, Bickman & Berkowitz

A

They showed passers-by would crane their neck and gawk as more confederates looked up to a sixty-floor window, showing that number of sources could affect obedience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Supporting evidence of SIMPT: Sedikides & Jackson

A

Conducted a field experiment at a New York Zoo where visitors were asked not to lean on a railing. Researchers manipulated the strength of the source by dressing a confederate either as a zookeeper (58% obedience) or in a T-shirt and shorts (35% obedience). Obedience also declined when visitors were further away from the person making the request (61% when in same room, 7% in an adjacent room) - tests immediacy. Divisional effect was also tested - obedience was greater in a smaller group of one or two visitors (fewer targets, 60%) compared with a group of five or six (more targets, 14%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strengths of SIMPT

A

Application: the idea of mathematical formula to calculate SIMP is useful. This means that you are able to predict whether laws will be followed. The theory suggests that if you want to get people to obey, you need to direct social force at them while in smaller groups and stop them from getting together in larger groups.

Generalisability: the extent to which the findings of a study can be applicable to other settings. It’s generalisable to all cultures as it highlights it is an idea present in all groups.

Validity: theory is measuring what it says to be measuring. It can be used to explain the results of Milgram’s two peers rebel study and the variation with the two teachers.

17
Q

Weaknesses of SIMPT

A

SIMPT variables have received research support for nurture factors involved in the behaviour but it has been criticised for being too descriptive and it does not provide an understanding of the underlying psychological processes influencing behaviour

Theory ignores the role of personality factors, such as the authoritarian personality, which has been linked to higher levels of obedience so is not a complete explanation of obedience

SIMPT does not attempt to explain why someone will over but simply outlines the factors involved

Hofling et al carried out field experiment and arranged for an unknown doctor to telephone 22 nurses and ask each of them to administer an overdose of a drug that was not in their ward list. 95% of the nurses went to administer the drug, although the doctor was not present, they still followed the doctor’s orders. Challenged SIMPT because the source being absent should have reduced the effect but it didn’t.