Obedience: situational explanations Flashcards
what is a strength of the agentic state as an explanation for obedience
research support
what is the research support for the agentic state
in Milgram’s experiment participants were told by the experimenter that he was responsible for the harm caused which lead them to go through with the procedure quickly without objecting
what does the research support for the agentic state show
- shows participants acted more easily as an agent when they believed they were not responsible for their own actions
- supports the idea of the agentic state
what is a limitation of the agentic state
it does not explain many research findings
what research findings does the agentic state not explain
Rank & Jacobson
what did Rank & Jacobson find
- most nurses disobeyed the doctors’ orders when it came to drug doses and gave an excessive amount
- the doctor was an authority figure but the nurses stayed in an autonomous state and did not shift into the agentic state
what do Rank & Jacobson findings show
shows the agentic shift can only explain obedience in certain situation and it does not always occur
what is a strength of legitimacy of authority
it explains cultural differences
what research explain cultural differences
- Kilham & Mann
- Mantell
what did Mantell and Kilham & Mann find
both studies replicated Milgram’s study in different countries
- Mantell: found in Germany 85% shocked learner to 450 volts
- Kilham & Mann: found in Australia only 16% shocked the learner to 450 volts
what did Mantell and Kilham & Mann research show
shows that authority is seen as more legitimate in some countries compared to others, reflecting upbringing and how much or little children were taught to obey authority figures
what is a limitation of legitimacy of authority
it cannot explain all disobedience or obedience
why can’t legitimacy of authority explain all obedience or disobedience
- in Rank & Jacobson study nurses disobeyed the doctors even though they knew and accepted their legitimacy of authority
- this suggests that innate tendencies towards disobedience may be more important in some cases than legitimacy of authority
- legitimacy of authority is not applicable to all cases