Obedience: dispositional explanations Flashcards
what is a strength of the authoritarian personality
research support
what research supports the authoritarian personality
Elms & Milgram
what did Elms & Milgram find
found that 20 fully obedient participants scored high on the F-scale compared to a control group of 20 disobedient participants
what do Elms & Milgram findings suggest
suggest obedient people may share many of the characteristics of people with an authoritarian personality
counterargument for Elms & Milgram
when they asked obedient participants about their upbringing, most had good and healthy relationships with their parents during childhood and not harsh and strict like people with an authoritarian personality
- suggests they did not obey because they have an authoritarian personality after all
what are some limitations of the authoritarian personality
- other factors may be responsible for obedience
- F-scale is politically biased
- authoritarianism can’t explain a whole country’s behaviour
what other factors may be responsible for obedience
lack of education
what research found that other factors may be responsible for obedience
- Middendorp & Meloen
- Milgram
what did Middendorp & Meloen and Milgram find
- Middendorp & Meloen found that less educated people are consistently more authoritarian than the well educated
- Milgram found that participants with lower levels of education were more obedient than those with higher levels of education
what did Middendorp & Meloen and Milgram’s findings suggest
suggest that instead of authoritarianism causing obedience, lack of education could be responsible for both obedience and authoritarianism, making the relationship between authoritarianism and obedience more illusionary than real
why is the F-scale political bias
researchers believe it to measure only extreme right-wing ideology however left-wing ideology also insists on complete obedience to authority which is not measured in the F-scale
what effect does the political bias of the F-scale have on Adorno authoritarian personality theory
it makes it not a comprehensive dispositional explanation as it does not explain obedience to left-wing authoritarianism
why can’t authoritarianism explain a whole country’s behaviour
- millions of people in Germany displayed obedient and anti-semitic behaviour however they cannot all have had the same personality
- it seems unlikely the whole population had an authoritarian personality so a more likely explanation is that Germans identified with the Nazi state
- this suggests that social identity theory may be a better explanation