Non-Fatal Offences Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

ASSAULT

Silent telephone calls could amount to an assault depending on the impact on the victim

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ASSAULT

Words alone may amount to an assault

A

Constanza 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ASSAULT

The apprehension of fear need not be rational

A

Smith V Chief Inspector of Woking Police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ASSAULT

If D is intoxicated when he commits the AR for assault/battery, they are considered to be the illegal act recklessly

A

DPP v Majewski 1976

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ASSAULT

D showed V a gun in a drawer and told V that it was loaded. V was frightened, V apprehended violence

A

Logdon V DPP 1976

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

BATTERY

Any unlawful touching will do, for example taking hold of somebodies arm.

A

Collins V Wilcock 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

BATTERY

Deliberately driving over somebodies foot is a battery

A

Fagan V Metropolitan Police Commissioner 1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

BATTERY

The application of force can be indirect

A

DPP V K 1990

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

BATTERY

C of A confirmed recklessness will do for MR of battery

A

Venna

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BATTERY

If D is under a duty to act, then they may commit a battery through an omission

A

DPP V Santana Bermudez

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

S.47

ABH means ‘any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim

A

Miller 1954

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S.47

Hurt/ injury can include loss of consciousness

A

T v DPP 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

S.47

Cutting V’s hair can amount to ABH so long there is a substantial amount of hair

A

DPP v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

S.47

Harm can include psychiatric harm but it must be a recognised medical condition

A

Chan Fook 1994

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

S.47

It is not necessary that D intended or was reckless about causing ABH

A

Savage and Parmenter 1991 (separate cases)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

S.20

It is critical for D to be charged with the correct offence.

A

C v Eisenhower 1984

17
Q

S.20

Wounding requires both layers of skin to be broken

A

Moriarty v Brookes 1834

18
Q

S.20

A broken bone is not a wound unless the skin is broken

A

Wood 1830

19
Q

S.20

GBH means ‘really serious harm’

A

DPP v Smith 1961

20
Q

S.20

The severity of the injuries should be assessed according to V’s age and health

A

Bollom 2004

21
Q

S.20

Serious psychiatric harm could amount to GBH

A

R v Ireland 1997

R v Burstow 1997

22
Q

S.20

Infecting somebody with HIV was seen as GBH

A

Dica 2004

23
Q

S.20

D must at least foresee some harm

A

R v Mowatt confirmed in Parmenter 1991