Non-Fatal Offences Cases Flashcards
ASSAULT
Silent telephone calls could amount to an assault depending on the impact on the victim
R v Ireland
ASSAULT
Words alone may amount to an assault
Constanza 1997
ASSAULT
The apprehension of fear need not be rational
Smith V Chief Inspector of Woking Police
ASSAULT
If D is intoxicated when he commits the AR for assault/battery, they are considered to be the illegal act recklessly
DPP v Majewski 1976
ASSAULT
D showed V a gun in a drawer and told V that it was loaded. V was frightened, V apprehended violence
Logdon V DPP 1976
BATTERY
Any unlawful touching will do, for example taking hold of somebodies arm.
Collins V Wilcock 1984
BATTERY
Deliberately driving over somebodies foot is a battery
Fagan V Metropolitan Police Commissioner 1969
BATTERY
The application of force can be indirect
DPP V K 1990
BATTERY
C of A confirmed recklessness will do for MR of battery
Venna
BATTERY
If D is under a duty to act, then they may commit a battery through an omission
DPP V Santana Bermudez
S.47
ABH means ‘any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim
Miller 1954
S.47
Hurt/ injury can include loss of consciousness
T v DPP 2003
S.47
Cutting V’s hair can amount to ABH so long there is a substantial amount of hair
DPP v Smith
S.47
Harm can include psychiatric harm but it must be a recognised medical condition
Chan Fook 1994
S.47
It is not necessary that D intended or was reckless about causing ABH
Savage and Parmenter 1991 (separate cases)
S.20
It is critical for D to be charged with the correct offence.
C v Eisenhower 1984
S.20
Wounding requires both layers of skin to be broken
Moriarty v Brookes 1834
S.20
A broken bone is not a wound unless the skin is broken
Wood 1830
S.20
GBH means ‘really serious harm’
DPP v Smith 1961
S.20
The severity of the injuries should be assessed according to V’s age and health
Bollom 2004
S.20
Serious psychiatric harm could amount to GBH
R v Ireland 1997
R v Burstow 1997
S.20
Infecting somebody with HIV was seen as GBH
Dica 2004
S.20
D must at least foresee some harm
R v Mowatt confirmed in Parmenter 1991