Constructive Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

D accidentally shot his friend. He knowingly pointed a loaded gun at his friend and pulled the trigger. However both people didn’t think it would fire. D tried for CM based on assault, however D did not fear and assault therefore there wasn’t one, neither was there a crime.

A

R v Lamb 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

D must have committed an unlawful CRIMINAL act that resulted in death.

A

R v Franklin 1883

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assault, an unlawful criminal act for CM

A

R v Larkin 1943

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An act which was the result of an omission, even if it was deliberate will not suffice for CM

A

R v Lowe 1973

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The UPCA does not need to be aimed at the victim, nor even at a person.

A

R v Mitchell 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The UPCA can be aimed at a property.

A

R v Goodfellow 1986

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DRUGS CASE

D and V prepared injections of drugs. They injected each other. V died and D was convicted.

A

R v Cato

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DRUGS CASE

D supplies V with drugs but does NOT help V inject it. Injection was the cause of death not supplying the drugs.

A

R v Dalby

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DRUGS CASE

D prepared syringe of heroin and hands it to V who self injects.

A

R v Dias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DRUGS CASE
D applied a tourniquet to V’s arm whilst V self injected. C of A argued that D had played an active part in a joint enterprise.

A

R v Rogers 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DRUGS CASE
D prepared an injection of drugs for V. D handed the syringe to V who injected before handing the syringe back to D. H of L decided D had not caused death.

A

R v Kennedy 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The test as to whether an act is dangerous is objective

A

R v Church 1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychological harm such as frightening or shocking are insufficient. D must cause V some physical harm

A

Dawson and Others 1985

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

D actions were dangerous due to V’s obvious frailty

A

R v Watson 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

D struck V once on the cheek with a moderate force. V collapsed to the ground and died

A

R v Furby 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

D punched V several times. Battery was considered to the reasonable man because multiple punches is likely to result in some physical harm

A

R v Lynch 2007

17
Q

D punched V once. V ran away and collapsed due to her unknown heart condition being aggravate me by running. Court ruled D did not cause the death as one punch is not usually dangerous.

A

Carey and Others 2006

18
Q

D only requires the MR for the unlawful criminal act not the death that it lead to.

A

R v Newbury and Jones 1976