Non-fatal OAP Flashcards

1
Q

Assault Mens rea

  • intention to cause apprehension of immediate violence
  • subjective recklessness as to that consequence

If IP does not apprehend violence then NO assault

D/NOT matter if IP fears the violence (eg may enjoy it)

Words and silence can be assault if accompanied by required mens rea

Very small amount of force applied (in)directly = battery

Falsely saying no sharps on search and PC stabs self on one = battery

A

CONSENT

  • Did IP consent to force
  • if so, do public policy considerations invalidate consent

Injuries caused in unauthorized fight cannot be consented to.

Injuries from ‘off the ball’ tackles can be assaults

Dentist suspended found NOT guilty on appeal of assault

Husband and wife can BRAND each other as sign of affection but sadomasochistic act for s47 assault NOT classed as consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s39 assault Criminal Justice Act 1988
Summary - 6 mths

s29(1)(c) Crime and Disorder Act 1998 Racially or religiously agg assault
e/w 2 yrs / 6 mths / fine

s47 ABH OAP Act 7861
e/w 5 yrs / 6 mths / fine

s29(1)(b) Crime and Disorder Act 1998 Racially or religiously agg ABH
e/w 7 yrs / 6 mths / fine

Momentary loss of consciousness can be actual bodily harm.

Cutting hair or fingernails against IP’s will can be ABH

A

s20 OAP Act Wounding, inflict GBH
e/w 5 yrs / 6 mths / fine

s29(1)(a) Crime and Disorder Act 1998 racially or religiously agg assault
e/w 7 yrs / 6 mths / fine

unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict GBH with or without a weapon

Maliciously - subjective recklessness. Def must realize some risk of harm but took risk anyway. Does not need to foresee the degree of harm, just that his behavior may bring about some harm

Wound - really serous harm, breaking of the whole skin

Inflict - directly or indirectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

GBH - incl;
some permanent disability/ disfigurement, loss of sensory function
broken, displaced limbs, bones
substantial loss blood (requiring transfusion, length op)

STI’s - HIV and genital herpes included

s18 OAP - Wounding with Intent
ind - life

unlawfully and maliciously wound or cause GBH with intent to do some GBH or with intent to resist/prevent the lawful apprehension/detention of any person.

Lawfulness of arrest must be proved by the prosecution.

Def cannot use defence of BELIEVING arrest unlawful but can raise mistaken belief being attacked as a defence

A

No specific racial or religious agg circs to s 18 but judge must KIV when sentencing.

s38 OAP Assault with intent to resist arrest
e/w 2 yrs

Arrest must be lawful. Def can resist arrest of self or another.

A mistaken belief as to ones own innocence is NOT defence.

s89 Police Act 1996 - Assault PC
summary / 6 mths

or person assisting PC in execution of duty

If def assaults custody officer and arrest found out to be unlawful still = assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s89 Police Act 1996 Obstruct Police
summary / 1 mth / fine

A person who resists or willfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty

eg warning others of speed check operation if persons being warned were speeding/about to speed

deliberately providing misleading info
drinking b4 breath test

obstruction must be willful
silence not obstruction unless under some duty to respond

A

Common law offence of refusing to assist PC in order to prevent BOP when asked to do so.

s16 OAP Making a Threat to Kill
e/w 10 yrs / 6 mths / fine

w/out lawful excuse makes threat intending another would fear kill that or another person.

Passing on threat from a third party would not be required mens rea (3rd party would still be guilty)

Cannot threaten to kill child in womb but can if threaten to kill it when born.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Assault PC incl store detectives

Cannot use lawful chastisement for s47 or above

Obstruct emergency workers 2006 Act incl responding to, preparing for and enroute to incidents.
includes threats to life and serious harm to environment.

A

Assaults are concerned with subjective recklessness - ie belief of defendant.
incl maliciousness

KIV Objective recklessness is view of reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly