NML Flashcards
Intro
Humans possess intrinsic values that govern reasoning and behaviour on morality – not imposed by legal standards
- Deontological
- Universal
- Absolute
Many different versions but Aquinas is most famous for his approach
-believed reason was the root of morality not scripture
Aristotle’s bronze statue analogy
Believed everything in the world was working towards a purpose via the four causes uses analogy of Bronze statue: (material cause is bronze, formal cause is its shape, efficient is the means it came about e.g. statue maker, and it final cause it its telos e.g. honouring the Gods
Aristotle quote
Eudaimonia is a common higher law set in motion by the PM (human fulfilment and flourishing)
It is what all humans perceive for its own sake” – achieve by living life virtuously
Russel and Dawkins critique of Aristotle
“Brute fact that has come about by chance and not by some divine purpose” does not allow NML approach as rejects premise in the first place
Strength of Aristotle
humans seem to be working towards final purpose
- gives sense to human life and purpose
- all following NML to achieve final cause
Counter to Aristotle
Claims observations are based on empirical evidence yet there is little evidence to support PM
- searching for beauty and purpose - needs to accept life as it is
- Russel fear of life after death
- Becker - trying to conserve our biological entities and make us seem purposeful
Aquinas on Eudaimonia
for Aquinas the universe is purposive
things exist to reach their goal
we have rational will to do so
Ultimate end but cannot be achieved in this life but the next
- achieved when reach the beatific vision - direct presence and knowledge of God
- can only achieve when use rationalism to follow Gods purpose for humanity
- revealed through 4 tiers of Law: Eternal; Divine; Natural ; Human
Support of Aquinas tiers of law
- Enables human to establish common rules in order to form communities and adhere to a universal law which is important within a relativist era at a time of breakdown within traditional social structures and moral uncertainty
- Gives people moral obligations and consequences for there actions and that if they don’t abide by the rules wont be able to reach eudaimonia and prevents anarchy
Karl Nielson
argued against there being belief in basic human nature that is present across all societies and cultures e.g. members of the Inuit culture killed members of family who could not make it through the winter, Scandinavians killed elderly relatives to allow to get Valhalla – shows there is no common NML
Synderesis rule
’ to do good and avoid evil’
- key rule in which all human inherit in human nature flow
Primary precepts/ secondary
From these primary precepts: preservation of life; to reproduce; to learn; ordered society; worship
using rationalism discern rules secondary precepts from primary on how to live a virtuous life and reach eudaimonia
Support of precepts
- appeals to instinctive conviction of what is right/wrong depends on more than personal opinion/ convention
- ways diff Soc come to same conclusions about NML supports idea human nature to recognise NML through both reason and intuition
- childhood absolute right and wrongs - justice ‘its not fair’ as soon as they suspect that they have received unequal treatment
Criticisms of primary precepts
Darwin evolution - living things motivated by desire for survival - natural selection - strongest survive/ weakest die
- humans seek survival and are self interested - child’s demand for justice is due to inherent need for survival survival
Wars
wars incentive peoples need to kill
- shows that there isn’t NML as people don’t all follow a higher law but rather ones that means that they’ve been told by leaders in power
People don’t follow a NML but rather:
People behave in a way in which they want to be treated
- in Bible ‘ Do unto others as you would unto others’
- but there isn’t a NML guiding us
- evolve this way as it is how we look after ourselves as wouldn’t have been able to survive