NMJ recap/workshop Flashcards

1
Q

Concentration response relationship - linear plot

A

The relationship between concentration and response is hyperbolic
EC50 is the concentration of agonist that elicits a half maximal response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Concentration response relationship to carbachol - linear plot

A

a linear plot is inconvenient when plotting a wide range of concentrations as it greatly compresses data at the lower end of the scale and the EC50 is ambiguous
It is easier to plot this with micromolar units

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Concentration response relationship - semi-logarithmic plot

A

the relationship between concentration and response is sigmoidal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Finding an EC50

A

the EC50 is the concentration of agonist that elicits a half maximal response
Draw a line from the 50% maximal percentage on the Y-axis until it reaches the plot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Concentration response relationships to carbachol in the absence and presence of (+)-tubocurarine - semi-logarithmic plot

A

in the presence of the antagonist tubocurarine the plot shifts to the right but shows no changes in maximan response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reversible competitive antagonism

A

the antagonist competes with the agonist for the same binding site on the receptor
The interaction between the antagonist and the receptor is reversible
The antagonism is surmountable over a wide range of agonist concentrations
In the presence of an antagonist, the agonist concentration-response curve is shifted to the right without a change in maximal response of change in slope (i.e. the shape of the concentration response curve remains unchanged)
No change in maximal response - still reaches 100% - no change in the shape of the curve
Shift to the right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Concentration ratio

A

the ‘shift to the right’ is best expressed as a concentration ratio. This is the factor by which the agonist concentration must be increased to, to restore a given response in the presence of an antagonist (e.g. the EC50)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

concentration ratio calculation

A

CR = Xa’ / Xa
Where Xa’ is the EC50 of the agonist and antagonist
Where Xa is the EC50 of the agonist alone
> This gives you the concentration of agonist that must be present to achieve the same response with the antagonist present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Calculating apparent pA2 from concentration rations

A

apparent pA2 = log10((CR-1)/[B])
Where [B] is the antagonist concentration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Competitive antagonism: setting up the Schild plot

A

agonist concentration-response curve over increasing concentration of antagonist.
An increase in concentration causes a shift to the right on the plot
The antagonism is still surmountable with increased concentrations of agonist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Competitive antagonism: the Schild plot: calculate EC50

A

Compare EC50 for agonist and (agonist + antagonist) concentration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Competitive antagonism: the Schild plot: calculate the Log10 concentration ratios -1

A

log10 concentration ratio - 1 = log 10((Xa’/Xa) -1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Competitive antagonism: the Schild Plot

A

if the antagonist is competitive, the slope of the regression should = 1.0
X intercept = KB - the equilibrium constant for the antagonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Competitive antagonism: the Schild Plot: Calculate pA2

A

pA2 = -log KB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

pA2

A

an indication of antagonist potency
pA2 is the negative log of the molar concentration of an antagonist that makes it necessary to double the concentration of the agonist needed to elicit the original response obtained in the absence of antagonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Competitive antagonism

A

competitive antagonist cause a parallel rightward shift of the agonist concentration response curve but maximum response is unchanged

17
Q

Non-competitive antagonism

A

non-competitive antagonists depress the slope and maximum concentration response curve, but do not cause a rightward shift

18
Q

Effects of increasing the concentration of a competitive antagonist

A

Progressive rightward shift of agonist concentration-response curve on concentration axis but no depression of the slope - a maximal response

19
Q

Effects of increasing the concentration of a non-competitive antagonist

A

progressive depression of maximum response and slope, but no shift of agonist concentration response curve on the concentration axis.

20
Q

Calculating a concentration ratio (CR)

A

CR = EC50 for agonist in the presence of antagonist / EC50 for agonist in the absence of antagonist

21
Q

Calculating the apparent pA2

A
  • pA2 = -log KB
22
Q

Constructing a concentration-inhibition plot

A

make measurements of twitch amplitude (representing muscle force)
% control response is given by:
> ([amplitude in presence of antagonist/amplitude in absence of antagonist] x100)

23
Q

IC50

A

The concentration of an antagonist where the agonist-evoked response (or ligand-binding, in the case of binding experiments) is reduced by 50%
Useful in estimating potency of irreversible competitive antagonists and non-competitive antagonists