New Words 2 (contracts) Flashcards

1
Q

Description (of goods)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Part of the basis of the bargain

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sample

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

coMMendAtion

A

Encomio, lode

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Affirmation

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statement of value

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mere (opinion)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Automatically

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

bUlk (of goods)

A

Massa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A sample is drawn FROM the bulk of goods

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Model is offered for inspection

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(They) amount to (a description of goods)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

To verify

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

To be fit FOR (the ordinary purpose)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Merchantable
Merchant
Merchantability

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Inoperative

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

conspicuOUs

A

Evidente

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

To indicate

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

To care ABOUT

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

To substitute (material WITH an equivalent one)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

To charge the buyer

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

To aCCoMModate (the subjective request)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Benchmark of the standard

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Warranty disclaimer

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

(The good is) defective

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Puffery

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

ON condition that

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Interpretative maxims

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Thin/Thick market

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

(To induce/prevent) Hold-up

A

Interruzione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Avoidance

A

Elusione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Concealment

A

Occultamento

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

ImpraCticability

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Impossibility

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Voluntariness (c’è solo una i)

A

Spontaneità

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

To be UNDER duress (2 S)

A

Constrinzione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Illegality

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Immorality

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Infancy

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Mental illness

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Unconscionabilty

A

Vessazione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Physical coercion

Coercive

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Objectionable (content of the agreement)

A

Deplorevole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Procedural/SUBSTANTIVE

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Detuine/replevin

A

Appropriazione indebita/restituzione

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q
unforEseeability
To forEsee (as a probable result of the breach)
A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Inadequate remedy at law

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Defect (in the bargaining process)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Restitution (c’è solo una N)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

To confer (benefits) ON the other party

confeRRed benefit

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Interest IN beING put in AS good position AS he would have been if the contract HAD been made

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Interest IN beING reimbursed for loss caused BY reliance ON the contract

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Plaintiff/defendant oriented

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Loss incurred

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

To make a contract

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Ordinary course of event

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

The party in breach

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Damages are not RECOVERABLE for loss

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Injured party

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

The conduct constituting the breach

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

On ground of public policy

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Difficulty of proof of loss

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

(Injunction to enforce) forbearance (qui for è senza E)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

To compensate the NON breacher for the injury caused by the breach

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

Measurement

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

Amount that evidence permits to BE established (with reasonable certainty)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

Avoidability

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Unde (risk, humiliation, burden)

A

Eccessivo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

She expected pain and suffering

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Unique

Uniqueness

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Precaution

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

Avoidable- duty to mitigate

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

Gain TO (promisor)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Efficiently

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

Correctness

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

(Entitled to an amount) INTENDED to put the plaintiff …

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

AT election (of the plaintiff)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

An amount corrEsponding TO (any benefit conferred by the plaintiff ON the defendant)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

Lenient

A

Lieve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Condition promised/condition actually resulting

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

To put the plaintiff BACK in the position

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

(To complete) the Restoration (of the status quo ante)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

Not-promissory liability

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

To analogize TO (the construction contract)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

Nominal damages

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

Adequately proven

A

D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

(Money damages) are designed (to put the injured party in the same position AS he would have been put by full performance)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
88
Q

(It would) enrich plaintiff (at defendant’s expenses)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
89
Q

No relation TO (compensation for plaintiff’s actual loss)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
90
Q

Defaulting party

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
91
Q

Natural and probable consequences

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
92
Q

Value TO (the plaintiffs)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
93
Q

Contracting parties

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
94
Q

I lease it TO you

I sell it TO you

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
95
Q

(A letter) PURPOSING (to cancel)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
96
Q

Disproportionate (in its harm TO defendant and in its assistance TO plaintiff)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
97
Q

Physical difference

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
98
Q

Economic interchangeability

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
99
Q

Uncertainty OF VALUING it

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
100
Q

Reliability

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
101
Q

(Un)reliable

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
102
Q

The value could be FIXED with reasonable certainty

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
103
Q

Inequity

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
104
Q

Comparable (goods)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
105
Q

Proponents (of a theory)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
106
Q

Breakage

A

Rottura, guasto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
107
Q

Damages arising naturally from the breach

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
108
Q

Usual course of things

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
109
Q

To coMMunicate

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
110
Q

knowN TO (both parties)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
111
Q

Amount ordinary follows under the circumstances

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
112
Q

Reluctant

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
113
Q

Consequential damage

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
114
Q

To award (damages)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
115
Q

To do nothing to increase damages

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
116
Q

Preponderance of evidence (more likely than not)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
117
Q

Standard of proof

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
118
Q

Pre-delivery inspection

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
119
Q

(The injury was caused) ON purpose

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
120
Q

Court overlooked and misconceived (material evidence)

A

Lasciarsi sfuggire e fraintendere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
121
Q

A dispute OVER (the ownership)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
122
Q

Bill of lading (c’è solo una N)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
123
Q

Consignor/consigned

A

Mittente/destinatario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
124
Q

Verbally expressed

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
125
Q

Red flags

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
126
Q

Boundary (b/w forceable and unenforceable promise)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
127
Q

GratuitOUs

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
128
Q

Promise must be conditional

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
129
Q

Genuine (bargained)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
130
Q

Illusory (exchange)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
131
Q

Bargained for exchange

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
132
Q

Sham (consideration)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
133
Q

Adequacy

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
134
Q

Nominality case

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
135
Q

On basis of costume

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
136
Q

MonEtary damages

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
137
Q

King’s bench

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
138
Q

Monopoly (to enforce duties)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
139
Q

cHanceLLor (h e 2 L)

cHancery

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
140
Q

Equitable principle

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
141
Q

Order compelling the defendant to do or not something

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
142
Q

The system is defeated

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
143
Q

To differ FROM

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
144
Q

To be bound

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
145
Q

Initially

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
146
Q

Otherwise the outcome would be unjust

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
147
Q

Separate (entity)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
148
Q

Indefiniteness (doctrine)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
149
Q

The promise didn’t induce reliance

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
150
Q

The doctrine requires demonstration of actual reliance

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
151
Q

Promissory estoppel extends the domain of promises that are enforceable

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
152
Q

LevErage

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
153
Q

Lack of consideration

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
154
Q

Actual/hypothetical bargaining context

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
155
Q

Acceptance is effective

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
156
Q

When dispatched

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
157
Q

RecEIpt rule

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
158
Q

Offeror/offeree

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
159
Q

Lapse (of time)

A

Trascorrere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
160
Q

To take effect

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
161
Q

Transfer ON (sale/possession)

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
162
Q

To fill gaps

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
163
Q

Inducement

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
164
Q

EvindenTiary requirement

A

A

165
Q

Performable

A

A

166
Q

To prevent fraudolent testimony

A

A

167
Q

Term contract/at will contract

A

A

168
Q

Economic condition

A

A

169
Q

(to FILE a) Motion to dismiss/for summary judgment/claim

A

A

170
Q

Must be performed within a year from the formation

A

A

171
Q

Legal characterization

A

A

172
Q

To mitigate harshness

A

A

173
Q

Morphemes (marks/sounds)

A

A

174
Q

Process of merging or reducing an agreement INTO a final writing

A

A

175
Q

OrtHodox

A

Aa

176
Q

Implicitly integrated

A

A

177
Q

Buy-back option

A

A

178
Q

Reservation in a deed

A

A

179
Q

Option IN THE money

A

A

180
Q

Assignable/personal right

A

A

181
Q

TO step in the shoes (of the bankrupt)

A

A

182
Q

To be consistent WITH

A

A

183
Q

To be silent ON (the question of assignability)

A

A

184
Q

Formalized structure of a deed

A

A

185
Q

To contradict (1 D sola)

A

A

186
Q

You have to register your interest

Register owner

A

A

187
Q

Protected from a double conveyance

A

A

188
Q

Critical fact

A

A

189
Q

Unionized hotel

Union-represented

A

Aa

190
Q

aDmissible/inaDmissible

AdmiTTed

A

A

191
Q

What the parties meant

A

A

192
Q

Merger clause is designed to prove integration

A

A

193
Q

Parole evidence has nothing to do with interpretation

A

A

194
Q

Objective meaning

A

A

195
Q

If the word is clear ON ITS FACE

A

A

196
Q

The court looks to the writing itself

A

A

197
Q

By looking at the 4 corners of the agreement we can infer if the contract is partially/fully integrated

A

Aa

198
Q

To be reasonably construed AS consistent WITH express terms

A

A

199
Q

Carefully negated: specific clause

A

A

200
Q

To return the favor

A

A

201
Q

Liability is a premise for recover

A

A

202
Q

coNforming Tender

A

A

203
Q

To coNform (the good is conformed TO what…)

A

A

204
Q

To act inconsistently WITH

A

A

205
Q

dEpendent/indEPendent

A

A

206
Q

We have to weigh the content of the contract

A

A

207
Q

Forfeiture/windfall

A

A

208
Q

Prohibitive

A

A

209
Q

idIosyncratic (non c’è nessuna E)

A

A

210
Q

No interpretation that leads to gross unfairness

A

A

211
Q

Undue

A

Esagerato

212
Q

It’s important that the injured party should not recover more from the breach than he would have gained if the contest had been fully performed

A

A

213
Q

Inappropriate

A

A

214
Q

To criticize FOR

A

A

215
Q

The cheaper option

A

A

216
Q

To bring an action seeking specific performance

A

A

217
Q

The court declined to order specific performance

A

A

218
Q

Inequitable in its effect

A

A

219
Q

What matters in measuring money damages

A

A

220
Q

Information about substitutes

A

A

221
Q

In the contemplation of both parties

A

A

222
Q

At the time they made the contract

A

A

223
Q

Involving items of great sentimental value

A

A

224
Q

An amount intended to put plaintiff in as good position as he would have been

A

A

225
Q

It is not limited TO (the restoration of the benefits conferred)

A

A

226
Q

Difference in value between the condition as promised and the conditions actually resulting from the breach

A

A

227
Q

In order to complete the restoration of the status quo ante

A

A

228
Q

To contend, to argue

A

A

229
Q

The conversation was collateral TO the sale

A

A

230
Q

An understanding with the buyer that was ignorant

A

A

231
Q

Part of the basis of the bargain

A

A

232
Q

Knowledgeable seller

A

A

233
Q

Relying chiefly, primarILy on the advise

A

Aa

234
Q

He testifies/testified

A

A

235
Q

His opinion was the principal, if not the only, factor which motivated him to purchasers

A

A

236
Q

TO state a facht OF WHICH the buyer was ignorant

A

A

237
Q

Considered in the light of the surrounding circumstances

A

A

238
Q

The good itself was fit FOR ordinary purposes

A

A

239
Q

Natural imperfections

A

A

240
Q

Foreign substance

A

A

241
Q

Clear and conspicUous

A

A

242
Q

To appeal from a judgment

A

A

243
Q

The judgment is against the manifest weigh of the evidence

A

A

244
Q

There was a sign “sold as is”

A

A

245
Q

Evidence is persuasive

A

A

246
Q

It’s generally understood to mean that

A

A

247
Q

The buyer purchases the good IN its PRESENT conditions

A

A

248
Q

WITH whatever faults

A

A

249
Q

Implied warranty is excluded by expression like “as is@

A

A

250
Q

To present evidence

A

A

251
Q

(Unable) to determine the cause

A

A

252
Q

Duty to execute the Contract in good faith and not fraudUlently

A

A

253
Q

The skill in selecting the conforming good

A

A

254
Q

Manufacturer

A

A

255
Q

To exercise his judgment

A

A

256
Q

Advantage of reducing frictions in the bargaining process

A

A

257
Q

To signal his belief

A

A

258
Q

Neither fraudulent neither willful

A

A

259
Q

Result of oversight and inattention

A

A

260
Q

They were the same in quality, appearance, market price, cost

A

A

261
Q

The defect was insignificant in relation to the projects

A

A

262
Q

Construed as conditions of one another

A

A

263
Q

Departure in point of substance

A

A

264
Q

The default is unfairly OUT OF proportion to the oppression of the forfeiture

A

A

265
Q

No examination was made

A

A

266
Q

Except for minor omission

A

A

267
Q

TO compensate the defendant for damages

A

A

268
Q

Right to contract FOR what he wanted

To Contract FOR

A

A

269
Q

A right before making the payment to get what the Contract called for

A

A

270
Q

Specifications of a contract become the law between the parties

A

A

271
Q

To hold a different doctrine

A

A

272
Q

To encourage

A

A

273
Q

A buyer can reject the good for any defect

A

A

274
Q

Only when the defect materially impairs the essence of what was contracted for

A

A

275
Q

Typical/ atypical parties

A

A

276
Q

Not always the breach of a condition is follewed by forfeiture

A

A

277
Q

Intentional or due to groos neglect

A

A

278
Q

Parole evidence rule enables the parties to reduce the risk that a court will misinterpret the agreement

A

A

279
Q

By committing some or all of the terms of their agreement TO a writing and agreeing that neither of the them will be permitted to introduce evidence in court other than the writing

A

A

280
Q

TO expand/contract

A

A

281
Q

If the writing appears ON its face to be a complete and exclusive statement of all the terms of the agreement

A

A

282
Q

Four corner presumptions

A

A

283
Q

Merger clause announcing that both parties REGARD the writing as a the final and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement

A

A

284
Q

To criticize

A

A

285
Q

Writing cannot prove its own finality and exclusivity

A

A

286
Q

Notwithstanding the merger clause (rebuttable presumption)

A

A

287
Q

To examine the Contract as a whole in isolation from its extrinsic context

A

A

288
Q

They were taken for granted where the contract was phrased

A

A

289
Q

To overcome difficulties

A

A

290
Q

They conveyed the property

A

A

291
Q

Evidence offered (by the defendant)

A

A

292
Q

To prove the existence of a separate agreement AS TO any matter OF which the writing is silent

A

A

293
Q

Written evidence is more accurate than human memory

A

A

294
Q

Exclusion of evidence

The evidence was improperly excluded

A

A

295
Q

To undermine paro evidence rule

A

A

296
Q

I provide you WITH money

A

A

297
Q

(To refuse) to refund the down payment

A

A

298
Q

The stability that it gives TO written contract

A

A

299
Q

He can avoid his obligation by testifying that an oral agreement released him from the duties he had assumed in writing

A

A

300
Q

Their intention to nullify antecedent agreement

A

A

301
Q

The parties are bound by the contract because they have choose To be bound

A

Aa

302
Q

They establish s written agreement as exclusive basis for determining their intention

A

A

303
Q

To vitiate the contract

A

A

304
Q

The fraud that could invalidate the merger clause

A

A

305
Q

Improbable

A

A

306
Q

The contract, read as a whole, plainly manifests…

A

A

307
Q

To determine what the parties collectively and subjectively intended

A

A

308
Q

No difference in interpretative result

A

D

309
Q

The plaintiff defended on the grounds that the contract, construed in light of the usage of trade…, impose no duties

A

A

310
Q

To enter into a contract

A

A

311
Q

The Contracts provides a minimum quantity of

A

A

312
Q

The price are to be adjusted according to the market forces

A

A

313
Q

The test of admissibility is not whether the contract appears ON ITS FACE complete

A

A

314
Q

The default clause refers only TO the failure of the buyer TO pay

A

A

315
Q

Unilateral/mutual adjustment

A

A

316
Q

The course of dealing form a part of the agreement

A

A

317
Q

They are not synonymous WITH verbal understanding (synonymous ha 2 Y)

A

A

318
Q

Equities were strongly in favor of the defendant

A

A

319
Q

The quantity stipulated in the contract was not mandatory and subject to renegotiation

A

A

320
Q

TO jeopardize the certainty of the contractual duties

A

A

321
Q

Placing ON the buyer the risk of variation in quantity

A

A

322
Q

The unilateral right to make a departure FROM such specification must be expressly agreed TO IN the contract

A

A

323
Q

A construction that negates the express terms is patently unreasonable

A

A

324
Q

The intent of the statute is To limit the enforceability of certain kind of ORAL contract

A

A

325
Q

To coerce the parties INTO memorialize their agreement

A

A

326
Q

TO create reliable evidence

A

A

327
Q

To reduce the possibility of enforcing fraudulent contracts proven by perjury testimony

A

A

328
Q

Actual commencement of the perform

A

A

329
Q

The statue makes unenforceable an oral contract that is not TO be performed within a year from its formation

A

A

330
Q

HIstorical (senza y)/modern function

A

A

331
Q

To prevent fraudulent practices

A

A

332
Q

Complaining parties were disqualified as witnesses

A

A

333
Q
Evidentiary function
Cautionary effect (to reflect on the importance)
Easy way to distinguish enforceable contracts
A

A

334
Q

Equity powers are a method of judicial circumvention of the statute

A

A

335
Q

The doctrine of estoppel has been applied to prevent fraud or unconscionable injury that Would result from refusal to enforce oral contracts

A

A

336
Q

In determining whether injustice can be avoided only by enforcement the following circumstances are significant

A

A

337
Q

The exten to which the action or forbearance corroborate evidence of the making of a contract (was foreseeable by the promisor)

A

A

338
Q

The reasonableness (of the action or forbearance)

A

A

339
Q

The sole function is to interpret the statute

A

A

340
Q

Outward manifestation

A

A

341
Q

Contractual obligation is imposed based on what a party reasonably believed was said and done

A

A

342
Q

Put the liability on that party able to prevent/minimize the risk of misunderstanding

A

A

343
Q

A deal was concluded

A

A

344
Q

An offer is conditioned on a specific return

A

A

345
Q

Manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain

A

A

346
Q

The nod and the handshake as a manifestation of intent

A

A

347
Q

Time-consuming process

A

A

348
Q

Invitation to negotiate: conditional statement of present intention

A

A

349
Q

Give to another the legal power OF creatING an obligation

A

A

350
Q

The power to invite the acceptance by any means

To limit acceptance TO a particular or specified means

A

A

351
Q

Silently

A

A

352
Q

Manifestation of intention that silence may operate as acceptance

A

A

353
Q

The offeree should notify the offeror that he doesn’t intend to accept

A

A

354
Q

Expectation of compensation

A

A

355
Q

Offer and acceptance are transmitted via mail

A

A

356
Q

Revocation is not effective

A

A

357
Q

An offer could be withdrawn at any time before performance was completed

A

A

358
Q

Once the offeree has begun the requested performance

A

A

359
Q

To limit the power to revoke

A

A

360
Q

Counteroffer constitutes a rejection of the original offer

A

A

361
Q

Unless the offeree has manifested a contrary intention

A

A

362
Q

An offer can only be accepted if the offeree agreed precisely and completely to the terms of the agreement. If acceptance varied in any way from the terms of the offer there would be a rejection of the offer

A

A

363
Q

Requirement of perfect matching b/w offer and acceptance

A

A

364
Q

To accept by rendering a performance/ by promising to perform

A

A

365
Q

To notify him of the acceptance

A

F

366
Q

The deceased made a will

A

A

367
Q

I left you $ 10,000

A

A

368
Q

The defendant has induced the plaintiff to act IN reasonable RELIANCE on his representation

A

A

369
Q

Payment were discontinued

A

Interrotti

370
Q

Defendant was obliged on the basis of…

A

A

371
Q

Adequacy

A

A

372
Q

Consideration must not have been delivered before a promise is executed

A

A

373
Q

Plaintiff announced his intent in advance OF any promise

A

A

374
Q

He acted ON his own initiative

A

A

375
Q

Change of position in reliance on the promise

A

A

376
Q

Bankrupt failed to make the payment

A

A

377
Q

There is an actual consideration A PART the past consideration

A

A

378
Q

To identify the maker of a promise

A

A

379
Q

To evidence the document’s authenticity

A

A

380
Q

Mere inadequacy of consideration will not void a contract

A

A

381
Q

Consideration even small is sufficient

A

A

382
Q

To substitute the parties’evaluation with its own judgement

A

A

383
Q

The party are better able than others to evaluate…

A

A

384
Q

He is indebited to him

A

A

385
Q

The notation that he is not the owner

A

A

386
Q

The trial court erred in finding a contract implied in fact

A

A

387
Q

A manifestation of intention must be inferred from the fact

A

A

388
Q

Ha quasi contract has no references to the intention, it arises from the law of justice and equity

A

A

389
Q

He acted at his own risk

A

A

390
Q

He is in the best position to prevent the mistake

A

A

391
Q

Express (2 s) language

A

A

392
Q

Consequential/direct damages

A

A

393
Q

The parties agreed ON the amount of damages in case of breach

A

A

394
Q

The meaning should be independent from the contractual context

A

A

395
Q

To keep good relationship

A

A

396
Q

He didn’t conditioned his promise ON a perfect tender

A

A

397
Q

The buyer keeps the good beyond a reasonable time for inspection of the good

A

A

398
Q

If there is an issue NOT ADDRESSED in that writing you can bring what evidence you need

A

A

399
Q

Ambiguous/well defined

A

A

400
Q

Promisor must have made the promise in order to INDUCE the promisee to do something IN RETURN

A

A

401
Q

No actual bargaining context neither hypothetical: the promisor doesn’t intend to be legally bound

A

A

402
Q

Chacellor was initially not bound by former decisions of courts of law (court of equity)

A

A

403
Q

Equity court gives an equity right because otherwise the outcome would be unjust

A

A

404
Q

The common law originated IN THE XI century In England

A

A

405
Q

Equity has the power to trump legal rules by order compelling the defendant to do or not something

A

A

406
Q

Procedural theory of contractual obligation v. Substantive theory (if parties have capacity, voluntariness, and are informant… not see the content of a contract)

A

A

407
Q

Legal age

A

A

408
Q

To ascertain

A

A

409
Q

To agree completely and precisely TO all the terms

A

A