Neurobiology of Memory and Classic Cases Flashcards
1
Q
Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968)
A
- Proposed information flows through sensory form, into short-term storage and then short-term memory
- Sensory information is subject to decay (disappear if due to lack of attention)
- Storgae of sensory information is only possible through attention and then stored in short-term storage
- Information is pushed out of short-term storage by more information or rehearsed and retained in long-term storage
- Long-term storage is lost due to interference - confuse information with other information
2
Q
Warrington and Shallice (1969) - Patient K.F
A
- Brain damage demonstrated certain incompatibilities with Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) model
- K.F had a digit span of 2 (normal is 6-8 items)
- Difficulty in short-term storage but was able to remember long-term information
- Had normal learning abilities
- The idea of flow from short-term storage to long-term storage is incompatible with K.F
3
Q
H.M patient overview
A
- Epiletic who had left and right medial temporal lobes removed: bilateral medial temporal lobectomy
- His seizures were dramatically reduced but so was his long-term memory
- Experienced both mild retrograde amnesia and severe anterograde amnesia
- While H.M was unable to form most types of new long-term memories (LTM), his short-term memory (STM) was intact and also had procedural memory.
4
Q
Retrograde amnesia
A
- Unable to remember the past (before H.M surgery)
5
Q
Anterograde amnesia
A
- Unable to form new memories
6
Q
Assessing H.M - Short Term Memory
A
- Digit Span
- If he was asked to read a series of number, he could repeat them back in order, providing that the time between them being read to him and him having to repeat them back was within a duration of short-term memory (immediate essentially)
- H.M. could repeat digit provided time between learning and recall is within the duration of STM i.e. Immediate recall
- Block-tapping memory-span test
- Demonstrated H.M STM fucntion was good for spatial information - with immediate recall
- Short-term/working memory okay for both verbal and visual spatial information
7
Q
Assessing H.M - Long Term Memory
A
- Digit Span: does not benefit from repeated testing
- Block-tapping memory-span test: does not benefit from repeating testing
- Suggesting amnesia is global, not limited to one sensory modality when it comes to LTM
8
Q
Evidence of new learning - H.M patient tasks
A
- Mirror tracing
- Rotary pursuit
- Incomplete pictures
9
Q
Evidence of new learning H.M - Mirror Tracing
A
- Required to trace between two lines, an outline of an image. Difficult to do when you can’t see what you’re drawing or where your pencil is, except through feedback from a meter
- H.M. was able to do this task with some effort and then showed improvement after a number of trials
- When H.M. came back and was tested again and again, he wasn’t starting at baseline. He had learned and was producing less errors and took less time than he had the first time, performance improved over the course of the day.
- So he was performing and learning this new skill normaly, so retained that learning.
10
Q
Evidence of new learning H.M - Pursuit rotor task
A
- You have to keep a stylus on a rotating target.
- He could also do that and improved over a learning trial period
- HM cerebellum was not damaged by the operation that might be of importance.
11
Q
Evidence of new learning H.M - Incomplete pictures task
A
- Shown a series of images that are in a degraded form. So they’re just basic outline shapes that you didn’t really know what this is.
- Then you’re showing them again and again until a point at which you can identify them and then for those that you’ve been unable to identify your shown more until you can’t identify them.
- Then people are showing them again and can identify them at a lesser stage because they’ve been exposed to them before
- He’s making a number of errors when seen in the degraded forms and less errors when he’s being shown the fuller forms and then when he is retested he’s making fewer errors on the very degraded form, so he’s making more identification and then fewer errors and the second most degraded forms and so on.
12
Q
Scientific contributions of H.M.’s case
A
- Medial temporal lobes are involved in memory
- STM and LTM are distinctly separate - H.M. Is unable to move memories from STM and LTM, a problem with memory consolidation
- Double dissociation with K.F.
- Memory may exist but not be recalled - as when H.M. exhibits a skill he does not know he has learned (dissociation between explicit and implicit memory
13
Q
Episodic and semantic Memory
A
- Unlike episodic memory, semantic memory does not involve conscious recollection of the past
- Extent of amnesia effects on each is different
- Episodic memory generally suffers more greatly (e.g., Spiers et al., 2001; Tulving, 2002; Vargha-Khadem et al., 1997)
- But some patients show more specifically semantic memory deficits (e.g., Yasuda et al., 1997)
- Different involvement of brain areas during encoding and retrieval (Wheeler et al., 1997)
14
Q
Autobiographical Memory
A
- A double dissociation between impairments of personal and semantic memory has been observed (Dalla Barba et al., 1990; De Renzi et al., 1987; Hodges & McCarthy, 1993)
- Neuroimaging data suggest that:
- Visual imagery and emotion centres in the brain, as well as frontal areas involved in self-referential processing, are important for autobiographical memories (Cabeza et al., 2004; Conway et al., 2003; Greenberg et al., 2005)
15
Q
Amnesia: A Modal Model
A
- Baddeley (see 2001) summarised a ‘modal model’ that accounted for most of the findings:
- Episodic memory learning involves associating items with their context using ‘mnemonic glue’ to tie episodes to context
- Recall and recognition involve the same underlying storage processes
- Semantic memory built from episodic memory