Neomarxism And Crime Flashcards
overview
They agree with Marxists that capitalist society is based on exploitation and class conflict which leads to crime. However, Taylor, Walton, and Young criticize Marxists for being economically deterministic, they assume that the WC commits crime out of economic necessity, instead, they take a voluntaristic approach which is the idea that we have free will. They argue that the WC has agency and crime is a meaningful action and a conscious choice by the actor, they don’t commit crime due to economic inequality but as a political motive in order to change society. Criminals are not passive puppets whose behaviours are shaped by capitalism they commit crime to change society
key sociologists
Taylor et al
Stuart Hall
who do they come up with
The fully social theory of deviance
fully social theory of deviance
Taylor et al offer a fully social theory of deviance, which they claim gives us a better understanding of crime and deviance. They combine interactionist and Marxist theory together to develop the concept. As a result, they see deviance as being influenced by both individual agency and structural forces such as the perception of the police, media, society at large and capitalism
fully social theory of deviance terms
- Wider Origins of Deviant Act
- Immediate origins of the Deviant Act
- The Actual Act of Deviance
- Immediate societal response to the Act
- Wider response to the act
- Impact of social reaction on future behaviour - the effects of labelling
wider origins of the deviant act
This serves to explain the deviant act in the context of capitalism and inequality. T W and L argue that C and D comes about because of the unequal distribution of wealth and power in capitalist society. The wider origins refer to the power structure in society, how unequal it is, and how inequality becomes a motive for deviant acts. For example, the current cost of living crisis and austerity cuts would mean that a working-class individual may be impacted by the inability to afford goods and this may influence their decision to deviate. Crime recorded in England and Wales as at September 2022 was 10% higher compared to 2020 (ONS)
immediate origins of the Deviant Acts
The particular social or economic context that has caused an individual to deviate. HIgh unemployment = loss of job, a WC individual may lose their job and be motivated to deviate. They struggle with the immediate consequence of living in a capitalist society and so they turn to crime to survive. Crime according to T W Y occurs because of specific factors like unemployment which leads to deviance
the actual act of deviance
The meaning the act holds for the actor. For T W Y, to understand the deviant act we must understand the meaning it holds for the actor. The meaning crime holds for the WC according to T W Y is that it is a form of rebellion against capitalism. Crime holds different meanings to the deviant. It could be a political act against the ruling class, a robin hood act on behalf of the poor. For example, sit-ins and riots committed by members of the CRM were seen as a crime but for them, it was a political act, a form of resistance against police racism. Similarly, the current climate change protests by Just Stop Oil were seen as a crime as they vandalized public property but for them, it was a political act against climate change - which is an effect of corporate crime. Vandalism is also seen as a symbolic attack on society’s obsession with property
the immediate response to the act
Reactions and responses from those around deviant to discovering the deviance. Such as the police, family, and community were they ostracised?
wider origins of social reaction
This refers to the responses from groups who have the power to define actions as deviant and to label others. The wider response explains why some acts are treated more harshly than others. It examines how wider social systems in a capitalist society react to the act. For example, the government has the power to label. For example in Stuart Hall’s study of policing, the Crisis and the Rise of muggings, he found that when the state portrayed mugging as a challenge it led to a law and order campaign against the so-called black mugger.
effects of labelling
The impact of society’s reaction on the deviant’s future behavior. Why does labelling lead to deviance amplification in some and not others
feminist eval
It is difficult to conceive how the vast majority of crimes would ever have any political motive or meaning as not all crimes are property crimes committed against the bourgeoisie. Violent crimes like rape, DV, and child abuse exist and they rarely have a political motive. Radical Feminists like brown miller would argue that rape and DV are crimes committed by WC men because society is patriarchal and men benefit from the oppression of women, it is not a crime with a political motive committed against the bourgeoise but a crime with a misogynistic and patriarchal motive. In essence, not every crime is committed or can be justified as being done for a political motive. It overemphasizes property crime
realist eval
- Right realists argue that Neo-marxism is too idealistic in its explanation. Rational choice based on the assessments of risks and benefits, not the meaning it holds causes crime. Radical criminology is too general in explaining crime and is not useful in tacking crime, it sees crime as an active revenge against inequalities in society it therefore offers no realistic answers to solving crime
- Left Realists criticize neo-Marxists for over-romanticizing WC criminals as robin hoods rebelling against capitalists or in Stuart Halls’s study of the black mugger, actively resisting racism. This romanticized view forces them to pay little attention to the victims of WC and black crime who are also WC and black. LRs conclude that radical criminology pays little attention to real victims of crime as they do not take into account the effects of WC street crime on WC victims
what does Stuart Hall apply
He applies Taylor et als fully social theory in his study - policing the crisis. The study is based on Black Criminality in regards to the rise of muggings in the 1970s
wider origins - Muggings
Hall looks at the rise of muggings within the wider social context of the economic recession of the 1970s. British capitalism faced a crisis, they were experiencing a period of stagflation. At such times, he argues that opposition to the government and capitalism begins to grow. The elite was in trouble and they needed a scapegoat to divert attention away from them which led to the emergence of the black mugger