media and crime Flashcards
overview
crime and deviance make up a large proportion of news coverage, ericson’s study of Toronto found that 45-71% of quality press and radio news was about various forms of deviance and its control while Williams and Dickinson found that British newspapers devote up to 30% of their news space to crime
media distorts crime factors
overrepresent violent and sexual crime
media portrays victims as older and more middle class
media coverage exaggerates police success
the media exaggerate the risk of victimization
crime is reported as a series of separate events
the media overplays extraordinary crimes
overrepresent violent and sexual crime sociologist
Ditton and Duffy
Marsh
media portrays criminals and victims as older and more middle class sociologist
felson
Media overrepresent violent and sexual crimes
For example, Ditton and Duffy (1983) found that 46% of media reports were about violent or sexual crimes, yet these made up only 3% of all crimes recorded by the police. One review by Marsh (1991) of studies of news reporting in America found that a violent crime was 36 times more likely to be reported than a property crime.
The media portray criminals and victims as older and more middle-class
The media portray criminals and victims as older and more middle-class than those typically found in the criminal justice system. Felson (1998) calls this the ‘age fallacy’
Media coverage exaggerate police success
Media coverage exaggerates police success in clearing up cases. This is partly because the police are a major source of crime stories and want to present themselves in a good light, and partly because the media over-represents violent crime, which has a higher clear-up rate than property crime.
Media exaggerate the risk of victimisation
The media exaggerate the risk of victimisation, especially to women, White people and higher status individuals.
Crime is reported as a series of separate events
Crime is reported as a series of separate events without structure and without examining underlying causes.
The media overplays extraordinary crimes
The media overplay extraordinary crimes and underplay ordinary crimes - Felson calls this the ‘dramatic fallacy’. Similarly, media images lead us to believe that to commit crime (and to solve it one needs to be daring and clever - the ‘ingenuity fallacy’.
Is the media changing sociologists
Schlesinger and Tumber (1994)
Is the media changing
There is some evidence of changes in the type of coverage of crime by the news media. For example, Schlesinger and Tumber (1994) found that in the 1960s the focus had been on murders and petty crime, but by the 1990s murder and petty crime were of less interest to the media. The change came about partly because of the abolition of the death penalty for murder and partly because rising crime rates meant that a crime had to be ‘special’ to attract coverage.
By the 1990s, reporting had also widened to include drugs, child abuse, terrorism, football hooliganism and ‘mugging’
Media preoccupation with sexual crime sociologist
Walby
Media preoccupation with sexual crimes
For example, Keith Soothill and Sylvia Walby
(1991) found that newspaper reporting of rape cases increased from under a quarter of all cases in 1951 to over a third in 1985. They also note that coverage consistently focuses on identifying a ‘sex fiend’ or ‘beast’, often by use of labels (such as ‘the balaclava rapist’). The resulting distorted picture of rape is one of serial attacks carried out by psychopathic strangers. While these do occur, they are the exception rather than the rule - in most cases the perpetrator is known to the victim.
News value and crime coverage
The distorted picture of crime painted by the news media reflects the fact that news is a social construction. That is, news does not simply exist ‘out there’ waiting to be gathered in and written up by the journalist. Rather, it is the outcome of a social process in which some potential stories are selected while others are rejected. As Stan Cohen and Jock Young (1973) note, news is not discovered but manufactured.
News values
A central aspect of the manufacture of news is the notion of ‘news values’. News values are the criteria by which journalists and editors decide whether a story is newsworthy enough to make it into the newspaper or news bulletin. If a crime story can be told in terms of some of these criteria, it has a better chance of making the news.
Key news values influencing the selection of crime stories include:
Immediacy - ‘breaking news’ - in which old news is disregarded and there is a race between news outlets to provide their report first before anybody, however due to this value it can be said that the outlets within the media disregard accuracy iin order to gain immediacy which will increase their circulation in their war against competing outlets
• Dramatisation - action and excitement - news is written for shock factor to grab the attention of the reader which can lead to increased preoccupation with certain crimes and inaccurate headlines for the sole purpose of getting attention
• Risk - victim-centred stories about vulnerability and fear
One reason why the news media give so much coverage to crime is that news focuses on the unusual and extraordinary, and this makes deviance newsworthy almost by definition, since it is abnormal behaviour.
Fictional representation of crime
We don’t just get our images of crime from the news media. Fictional representations from TV, cinema and novels are also important sources of our knowledge of crime, because so much of their output is crime-related.in example, Ernest Mandel (1934) estimates that from 1945 to 1984, over 10 billion crime thrillers were sold worldwide, while about 25% of prime time TV and 20% of films are crime shows or movies.
Fictional representations of crime, criminals and victims follow what Surette (1998) calls the law of opposites”: they are the opposite of the official statistics - and strikingly similar to news coverage.
Fictional representation of crime factors
• Property crime is under-represented, while violence, drugs and sex crimes are over-represented.
• While real-life homicides mainly result from brawls and domestic disputes, fictional ones are the product of greed and calculation.
• Fictional sex crimes are committed by psychopathic strangers, not acquaintances. Fictional villains tend to be higher status, middle-aged White males.
• Fictional cops usually get their man.
Eval of fictional representation of crime
However, three recent trends are worth noting. Firstly, the new genre of ‘reality’ infotainment shows tends to feature young, non-White ‘underclass’ offenders. Secondly, there is an increasing tendency to show police as corrupt and bruta (and as less successful). Thirdly, victims have become more central, with law enforcers portrayed as their avengers and audiences invited to identify with their suffering.
Media as a cause of crime overview
There has long been concern that the media have a negative effect on attitudes, values and behaviour - especially of those groups thought to be most susceptible to influence, such as the young, the lower classes and the uneducated.
Media causes crime factors
Fear of crime
Relative Deprivation
Cultural deprivation
The commodification of crime
Fear of crime sociologist
Gerbner et al
Schlesinger and Tumber (1992)
Fear of crime
As we have seen, the media exaggerate the amount of violent and unusual crime, and they exaggerate the risks of certaln groups of people becoming its victims, such as young women and old people. There is therefore concern that the media may be distorting the public’s impression of crime and causing an unrealistic fear of crime.
Research evidence to some extent supports the view that there is a link between media use and fear of crime. For example, in the USA, Gerbner et al found that heavy users of television (over four hours a day) had higher levels of fear of crime.
Similarly, Schlesinger and Tumber (1992) found a correlation between media consumption and fear of crime, with tabloid readers and heavy users of TV expressing greater fear of becoming a victim, especially of physical attack and ‘mugging’.
Eval of fear of crime
However, the existence of such correlations doesn’t prove that media viewing causes fear. For example, it may be that those who are already afraid of going out at night watch more TV just because they stay in more.
Finally, as Greer and Reiner (2012) note, much ‘effects’ research on the media as a cause of crime or fear of crime ignores the meanings that viewers give to media violence. For example, they may give very different meanings to violence in cartoons, horror films and news bulletins. This criticism reflects the interpretivist view that if we want to understand the possible effects of the media, we must look at the meanings people give to what they see and read.