Negligence Defenses Flashcards
Contributory Negligence
ANY negligence by P results in total bar to recovery
Comparative Negligence
negligence by P results in reduced recover (may totally bar recovery)
Types of Assumption of Risk
**mostly abandoned
express v implied
Types of Immunities
judicial proceedings, employer, families, charities, governments, tribes, public officers
Pure Comparative Negligence
No threshold; % of fault reduces
Comp Neg. 50% allowed rule
allows P to be negligent up to 50% while still obtaining relief
majority
“is not greater than”
Comp Neg. 50% bar rule
“is less than”
Express Assumption of Risk
requires explicit agreement in words assuming the risk
written or oral
majority
Implied Assumption of Risk
by conduct or actions, P shows assumed risk
minority
Assumption of Risk Elements
- Knowledge - P knows and appreciates the risk, including its nature and severity (subj)(requires actual knowledge)
- Voluntariness - P takes on risk in an entirely voluntary way
Statute of limitations
cause of action accrues when the P discovered or should have discovered the negligently inflicted injury rather than at the time of the injury.
Interspousal Immunity
immunity between spouses
no longer recognized in Washington
Parental Immunity
immunity of parents when acting in thir capacity as a parent
WA has retained parental immunity when the case arises out of negligent supervision by a stepparent after having previously abandoned it
Charitable Immunity
no longer recognized in most jurisdictions
Sovereign Immunity
Federal government is immune from suit (subject to exceptions)