natural law (1) Flashcards

1
Q

telos

A

people have a unique purpose, Aristotle said rational thought. Aquinas develops into syderesis rule, do good and avoid evil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

primary precepts

A

Preserve innocent life
Reproduce
Education
Live in an ordered society
Worship God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

importance of the primary precepts

A

they are Aquinas’ idea- universal statements about what is good, secondary are derived from these. ie preserve innocent life means dont murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

four tiers of law

A

eternal- the mind of God of what is right an wrong
divine- laws revealed by God in the teachings of revelation
natural- moral thinking we can all do
human- customs and practises of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

catholic church

A

fixed secondary precepts, reject all artifical forms of contraception. people may say NL is too outdated and rigid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

eudamonia

A

Aristotle’s idea of flourishing, some want to go back to this and say we have to develop a good character to fufill eudamonia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

John Finnis

A

uses Aristotles idea of phronesis (reasoning) to say there are basic goods to human flourishing, like knowledge. from here more specific rules could be put forward and what we do matters, not just end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

natural law helpful in moral decision making

A
  • not very controversial, merely goods valued by societies
  • absoloutist, clear judgements
  • still maintain flexibility, however some are less (Catholics)
  • beleive some rights exist in any context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

natural law unhelpful in moral decision making

A
  • basic goods do vary, secondary precepts cultural
  • too legalistic when focusing on issues, there are clear problems
  • naturalistic fallacy, observing what happends and assuming thats what must happen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

satre

A

existentalist- objects have a fixed nature and must carry out their purpose, however as an atheist he believed purpose could only be given by God so we must decide our own essence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Satre and freedom

A

we have a tendency to deny our freedom, living in ‘bad faith’- we have no fixed essence and can liev however we want.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

essentalists

A

aquinas and aristotle- a belief that there is something in humans we cannot change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

natural law is right to base right/wrong off

A
  • if essentialists are right and there is a basic human nature then there is good to strive towards
  • the Bible reveals the ‘plans and purposes that God has for human beings’ Jeremiah 29:13
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

natural law is wrong to base right/wrong off

A
  • Aquinas make mistake by assuming all have the same purpose, we arent all the same (priests celibate)
  • existentalists dispute whether humans have any purpose except the one chosen for themself
  • evolution suggests purpose is not intrinsic but a human projection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

interior and exterior acts

A

interior- good motive
exterior- good action
both be good to be a good action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

doctrine of double effect

A

actions may have more than one effect, Aquinas thought intention is what mattered. He used the example of self-defense, even if you killed someone in the process you are not guilty of doing something wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

double effect: abortion

A

during pregnancy a woman is told her life at risk, you are allowed to get rid of the feotus in the name of a good action (surgery) to save a mothers life (consequnce)

18
Q

double effect: euthanasia

A

a large dose of a pain killer has the effect of relieving pain but killing the patient, it is intended good action and therefore jo one is guilty

19
Q

double effect justified moral actions

A
  • double effect allows flexibility in other rigid moral decisions making
  • recognition of complexity in real life, absolutists like Kant have no answers for real life situations
20
Q

double effect dont justify moral actions

A
  • idea that a bad effect is permitted if unintended is difficult to judge, impossible to judge someones intention
  • how far can we truly press double effect? contraception being use to prevent HIV controversial in catholicism.
21
Q

stoicism

A

Zeno and Airelius viewed the world as an ordered place, left with God’s divine reason. belived this spark is left within us, so right actions ones we are able to reason.

22
Q

Cicero

A

believes Natural Law is ‘right reason in accordance with nature’

23
Q

apparent/real good

A

aquinas idea that nobody ever does a wrong action, apparent good is mistakenly thought to be a real good

24
Q

people have an orientation towards good

A
  • stoicism appeal to the order present in creation, ie Paley’s design argument
    -Aquinas is right that we do want to live life well and when we miss is because we are unclear
  • natural law gives diginity to humans and allows them to reason
25
people have no orientation towards good
- objection to the orientation of creation is to reject telelogical assumption of God. evolution? - Augustine would say concupisence means we have lost the ability to make good moral decisions - aquinas is too optimistic - aquinas' view on goods in naive, it seems people knowingly commit bad actions
26
J.S Mill
biblical authority was only relevant in a more barbaric time
27
science and telos
there is no proof an intrinsic telos, sean caroll says purpose not a part of universe architecture
28
tegmark
argues that one day scientists will be able to explain why the universe exists
29
Barth
"the finite has no capacity for the infinite", therefore we cannot use reason to know God
30
proportionalism
action causes greater amount of good than evil it is justified, people like Hoose agree and say NL not flexible enough
31
nature of the act condition
feature of double effect- the secondary consequence cannot be an innate evil, like killing an innocent person
32
Aquina social context
having children outside marriage worse as women unable to work and provide around 60-70 X murder rate in Aquinas time
33
Francis Bacon
claimed the idea of Telos was unscientific
34
Sean Carroll
purpose not built into the architecture of the universe
35
cross counter moral differences
Fletcher's criticism. if our conscious drives us towards morals then tehre should be more universal morals. as morals tend to fall along moral lines that is a better explanation.
36
nature and reason
the nature of a thing dictates what is 'natural' about it. an acorn grows on a oak tree as that is the purpose of it.
37
Aquinas
"the light of reason is placed by nature in every man"
38
Dawkins
asks what is the 'colour of jealousy'. he uses this analogy to express that while we can ask something, it does not mean there is a specific answer.
39
Polkinghorne
says that science cannot explains everything in the universe and why it is inclined towards purpose
40
corruption
Barth argues that corruption of our mind means that we cannot know everything that God wants
41
Hoose
uses a version of proportionalism. he says it is wrong to go against the Primary Precepts but there are times when it is needed. whatever action enables flourishing is an 'ontic good' factual goods like health.
42