natural law (1) Flashcards
telos
people have a unique purpose, Aristotle said rational thought. Aquinas develops into syderesis rule, do good and avoid evil
primary precepts
Preserve innocent life
Reproduce
Education
Live in an ordered society
Worship God
importance of the primary precepts
they are Aquinas’ idea- universal statements about what is good, secondary are derived from these. ie preserve innocent life means dont murder
four tiers of law
eternal- the mind of God of what is right an wrong
divine- laws revealed by God in the teachings of revelation
natural- moral thinking we can all do
human- customs and practises of society
catholic church
fixed secondary precepts, reject all artifical forms of contraception. people may say NL is too outdated and rigid
eudamonia
Aristotle’s idea of flourishing, some want to go back to this and say we have to develop a good character to fufill eudamonia
John Finnis
uses Aristotles idea of phronesis (reasoning) to say there are basic goods to human flourishing, like knowledge. from here more specific rules could be put forward and what we do matters, not just end
natural law helpful in moral decision making
- not very controversial, merely goods valued by societies
- absoloutist, clear judgements
- still maintain flexibility, however some are less (Catholics)
- beleive some rights exist in any context
natural law unhelpful in moral decision making
- basic goods do vary, secondary precepts cultural
- too legalistic when focusing on issues, there are clear problems
- naturalistic fallacy, observing what happends and assuming thats what must happen
satre
existentalist- objects have a fixed nature and must carry out their purpose, however as an atheist he believed purpose could only be given by God so we must decide our own essence
Satre and freedom
we have a tendency to deny our freedom, living in ‘bad faith’- we have no fixed essence and can liev however we want.
essentalists
aquinas and aristotle- a belief that there is something in humans we cannot change
natural law is right to base right/wrong off
- if essentialists are right and there is a basic human nature then there is good to strive towards
- the Bible reveals the ‘plans and purposes that God has for human beings’ Jeremiah 29:13
natural law is wrong to base right/wrong off
- Aquinas make mistake by assuming all have the same purpose, we arent all the same (priests celibate)
- existentalists dispute whether humans have any purpose except the one chosen for themself
- evolution suggests purpose is not intrinsic but a human projection
interior and exterior acts
interior- good motive
exterior- good action
both be good to be a good action
doctrine of double effect
actions may have more than one effect, Aquinas thought intention is what mattered. He used the example of self-defense, even if you killed someone in the process you are not guilty of doing something wrong
double effect: abortion
during pregnancy a woman is told her life at risk, you are allowed to get rid of the feotus in the name of a good action (surgery) to save a mothers life (consequnce)
double effect: euthanasia
a large dose of a pain killer has the effect of relieving pain but killing the patient, it is intended good action and therefore jo one is guilty
double effect justified moral actions
- double effect allows flexibility in other rigid moral decisions making
- recognition of complexity in real life, absolutists like Kant have no answers for real life situations
double effect dont justify moral actions
- idea that a bad effect is permitted if unintended is difficult to judge, impossible to judge someones intention
- how far can we truly press double effect? contraception being use to prevent HIV controversial in catholicism.
stoicism
Zeno and Airelius viewed the world as an ordered place, left with God’s divine reason. belived this spark is left within us, so right actions ones we are able to reason.
Cicero
believes Natural Law is ‘right reason in accordance with nature’
apparent/real good
aquinas idea that nobody ever does a wrong action, apparent good is mistakenly thought to be a real good
people have an orientation towards good
- stoicism appeal to the order present in creation, ie Paley’s design argument
-Aquinas is right that we do want to live life well and when we miss is because we are unclear - natural law gives diginity to humans and allows them to reason