euthanasia (5) Flashcards

1
Q

sanctity of life quotes

A

“so God created mankind in his image” Genesis 1:27
“you shall not murder” Exodus 20:13
“your bodies are the temples of the Holy spirit” Corinthians 6:18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

voluntary/non voluntary euthanasia

A

voluntary= someones life is ended at their own request
non voluntary= someones life is ended without their consent but with consent of someone representing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

quality of life

A

others view quality of life as more important than sanctity. quality of life says life is valuable if it has certain characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

peter singer

A

5 quality of life commandments:
1. recognise quality of life varies
2. take responsibility for consequences of decisions
3. respect desire to live/die
4. only bring children to the world if wanted
5. dont discriminate based on species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

concept of sanctity of life remains a useful concept

A
  • upholds intrinsic value of life when we are more dehumanised
  • ensures basic rights are respected
  • anti euthanasia because may mean a slippery slope. point to abortion whereby a few were expected and now it is 180,000 annually
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

concept of sanctity of life is no longer a useful concept

A
  • sanctity of life is outdated in a secular society, 10% attend church
  • concept of sanctity at odds with autonomy in case of voluntary
  • interpreting sanctity of life is self defeating and causes pain
  • demands that life must be saved at all costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

preserve human life

A

one of natural law’s primary precepts so would lead to secondary precept, no euthanasia. euthanasia may be viewed as an apparent good, standing in place of a real good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ecclesiastes chapter 3

A

‘there is a time to be born and a time to die’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

contradictions to natural law

A
  • the double effect, it is allowed to give a pain killer that could risk ending someone’s life
  • ordinary/extraordinary means. obligation to give all ordinary treatment- not extraordinary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

cathecism

A

‘discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitmate’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dr Moor

A

1999 Dr Moor was cleared of murder of an old man who had a heart attack and stroke after he gave him morphine. double effect would support Moor, as Moor wanted to reduce pain (intent) rather than kill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

proportionalism

A

argues laws of natural law can be broken if there is a valid reason. proportionalists like Daniel Maguire argues when biological life continues without personhood- shortening life is not wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

natural law provides a good approach to euthanasia

A
  • committed to the sanctity of life, it limits slippery slope potential
  • natural law prevents individuals playing God and making decisions
  • double effect provides flexibility in a rigid system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

natural law provides a bad approach to euthanasia

A
  • overly religious and depdent on christian roots
  • natural law is legalistic and absolutist, different situations
  • requirs that an indivual can live in an extreme pain
  • no weight of human autonomy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Joseph Fletcher

A

keen supporter of euthanasia, president of euthanasia society of America. he did not think sanctity of life was determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

situation ethics

A

rejected legalism and rules like ‘do not kill’ are general but can be broken when love demands it. SE values quality of life over sanctity, as ‘personalism’ one of key principles. values pragmatism- should do whatever is likely to work.

17
Q

Morals and medicine

A

Fletcher’s 1954 book, states that medical conditions need to be the starting point for medical ethics. does not endorse euthanasia but recognises where it may be needed.

18
Q

situation ethics provides a good approach to euthanasia

A
  • flexibility of SE very useful as offers general principles for complex situations
  • agape is a good principle and puts people first
  • medical knowledge means we known who is capable of treating
  • respects autonomy of the indivual
19
Q

situation ethics provides a bad approach to euthanasia

A
  • may be vague and little guidance on what the most loving thing is
  • requires a prediction of future consequences
  • lacks absolute boundaries and critics of euthanasia think of a ‘slippery slope’.
20
Q

Hannah Jones

A

a 13 year old in 2008 who did not want to have a heart transplant because she had been in and out of hospital all of her life. she would rather die.

21
Q

autonomy

A

humans should be free to make decisions. Mill’s no harm principle, government have no right to restrict our own freedom. Singer’s preference utilitarinism agrees.

22
Q

Jonathan Glover

A

external checks are required as to someone’s state of mind, specifically that the decision is reasonable.

23
Q

non voluntary autonomy?

A

if patients give instructions (like DNR) then their autonomy is being respected. others have living wills. 2011, found hospitals putting DNR on elderly patients without consulting family

24
Q

people should have autonomy over their own lives

A
  • SE supports idea of autonomy and a key aspect of ‘personalism’ that we allow individuals to make decisions
  • arguments against autonomy are based on sanctity which is irrelevant if God not real.
25
people should NOT have autonomy over their own lives
- natural law would reject the view autonomy is the most important consideration - not a concept that is supported by biblical sacred texts -autonomy very difficult to apply in a stressful time
26
active/passive euthanasia
active= treatment that is given directly to cause death passive= treatment is witheld and this indirectly causes the death
27
james Rachels thought experiment
case 1: Smith is legal guardian for his nephew and whill inherit loads, he makes a plan to kill him (act) case 2: Jones is also a legal guardian for his nephew, Jones resents him but will not harm. he watches him slip and die but doesnt help (omission) argues that both cases are equally bad
28
peter singer acts/omissions
says they are not clear cut- the removal of treatment is an ommission. there is no way of perfectly knowing what is an act/ommission.
29
there is a significant difference between acts and omissions
- for natural law thinkers actions matter. - distinction between the two is an issue with moral agency. if we were to allow active euthanasia this would break hyporctaic oath
30
there is NOT a significant difference between acts and omissions
- situation ethics challenges distinctions because it requires a compasisonate response - practically difficult to withdraw treatemnt - double effect is compex