My notes 2 Flashcards
facts beyond change
physical evidence, forensic testing, video recordings, audio recordings, photographs, documents
facts beyond disbelief
admissions, statements against interest, neutral eyewitness testimony, corroborated testimony, multiple witness testimony.
Latent facts
facts not found in depositions or statements, but facts assumed to be true based upon personal experience.
Collective agreement about how the world works.
goals on cross
1) look good, 2) tell a sotry, 3) use short statements
Who is arguing case on cross?
Argue case through witness.
most witnesses tell the truth as…
they see it. Find areas where they agree with you, or at least don’t constest your arguments.
7-1-3
7 words or fewer.
1 fact per question (no adjectives or adverbs, no compound questions)
3 categories (how can witness help me, how have they hurt me, impeachment)
Why shouldn’t you be rude to witness?
The jury can more easily imagine being the witness than the lawyer.
You make your best deicsions while…
calm. You also look best while calm.
Repeat reverse for something important example?
Your report is accurate? I think so. So your report is accurate? I hope so? Is your testimony that your report is inaccurate? No.
Is the witness necessary on cross?
The witness is unnecessary. You are telling the truth and you are simply having the witness confirm the truth (on cross). Direct is the opposite. On direct the witness is the star.
How to go beyond established facts in cross?
Take your head out of established facts and think what else might be there (what does a typical day for someone with that job look like, what sort of things do people with that job tend to believe, what do people tend to believe about people with that job, etc.).
reading questions on cross?
Don’t read your questions. Look up. Look at the witness (maybe occasionally the jury, but mostly develop a relationship with the witness in which they will be led by you). Listen. Make eye contact. Tell a story.
Are why questions ever ok on cross?
Some why questions are ok (when the answer can’t hurt you). Ex. Why isn’t it against the law to be disheveled, or why isn’t it against the law to smell like alcohol.
probability cross
Figure out a series of questions that step by step drives the witness to the examiner’s point at the pain of the witness being disbelieved (agree with me even if you don’t want to or dispute it at the loss of your credibility).
Questions must proceed in an order to build the line of probability.
Combines all three categories of agreement, limiting, and impeachment but it feels impeaching.
Obtaining witness statements for cross?
Obtain every statement made by witness (formal, written under oath, informal in emails, texts, and social media, all publications made by an expert, hearsay statements, includes by individual, agents, parties, lawyers, co-conspirators, you need direct quotes.
Analyzing statements for cross
Look at statements by topic area (what words did they use, why did they make a statement, who did they tell), and keep an eye on the timeline of statements (does it change over time, do they become more definitive, who are they talking to about the case).