My notes 2 Flashcards

1
Q

facts beyond change

A

physical evidence, forensic testing, video recordings, audio recordings, photographs, documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

facts beyond disbelief

A

admissions, statements against interest, neutral eyewitness testimony, corroborated testimony, multiple witness testimony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Latent facts

A

facts not found in depositions or statements, but facts assumed to be true based upon personal experience.
Collective agreement about how the world works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

goals on cross

A

1) look good, 2) tell a sotry, 3) use short statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who is arguing case on cross?

A

Argue case through witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

most witnesses tell the truth as…

A

they see it. Find areas where they agree with you, or at least don’t constest your arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

7-1-3

A

7 words or fewer.
1 fact per question (no adjectives or adverbs, no compound questions)
3 categories (how can witness help me, how have they hurt me, impeachment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why shouldn’t you be rude to witness?

A

The jury can more easily imagine being the witness than the lawyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

You make your best deicsions while…

A

calm. You also look best while calm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Repeat reverse for something important example?

A

Your report is accurate? I think so. So your report is accurate? I hope so? Is your testimony that your report is inaccurate? No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is the witness necessary on cross?

A

The witness is unnecessary. You are telling the truth and you are simply having the witness confirm the truth (on cross). Direct is the opposite. On direct the witness is the star.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How to go beyond established facts in cross?

A

Take your head out of established facts and think what else might be there (what does a typical day for someone with that job look like, what sort of things do people with that job tend to believe, what do people tend to believe about people with that job, etc.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

reading questions on cross?

A

Don’t read your questions. Look up. Look at the witness (maybe occasionally the jury, but mostly develop a relationship with the witness in which they will be led by you). Listen. Make eye contact. Tell a story.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Are why questions ever ok on cross?

A

Some why questions are ok (when the answer can’t hurt you). Ex. Why isn’t it against the law to be disheveled, or why isn’t it against the law to smell like alcohol.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

probability cross

A

Figure out a series of questions that step by step drives the witness to the examiner’s point at the pain of the witness being disbelieved (agree with me even if you don’t want to or dispute it at the loss of your credibility).
Questions must proceed in an order to build the line of probability.
Combines all three categories of agreement, limiting, and impeachment but it feels impeaching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Obtaining witness statements for cross?

A

Obtain every statement made by witness (formal, written under oath, informal in emails, texts, and social media, all publications made by an expert, hearsay statements, includes by individual, agents, parties, lawyers, co-conspirators, you need direct quotes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Analyzing statements for cross

A

Look at statements by topic area (what words did they use, why did they make a statement, who did they tell), and keep an eye on the timeline of statements (does it change over time, do they become more definitive, who are they talking to about the case).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Witness actions and decisions for cross?

A

List every action taken by the witness (what did the witness do, why did they do what they did)?
List every decision made by the witness (sometimes we act without thinking; other times we analyze before acting, you can turn actions into decisions).

19
Q

witness delegation for cross

A

Are there instances where the witness did not make a decision and relied upon others’ judgment or action? (we can agree that if the data was bad, then it will lead to a bad decision, if the person you relied on did a bad job then you will make a bad decision)

20
Q

counterfactual for cross

A

what are all the actions the witness could have taken - but didn’t? (employ the power of hindsight bias to your advantage).

21
Q

inegrity based reasoning for cross

A

Why did the witness make one decision over another?
Identify assumptions (assuming a rational, kind, just witness - what are the assumptions that witness relied upon when making a decision or taking an action or deciding not to act? Think broadly).

22
Q

psychodrama for cross

A

(reverse roles and put yourself in the witness’s shoes, what is the information you want in making a decision, where are your blind spots).

23
Q

paradoxes for cross

A

(a witness that describes being terrified is also the witness responsible for providing an objective, clear, detached eyewitness description). Ex. Car accident crashes involve trauma, and that lowers the integrity of the testimony, but raises the confidence level. On cross you have to go through why the integrity might not be as good.

24
Q

commonplaces for cross

A

Identify the commonplace assumptions the public believes to be true (generally, specifically, even if incorrect).

25
Q

save face on cross?

A

Find ways to allow the witness to save face (it’s not an attack; it’s a shared discovery why our brains are not as accurate as our memory believes them to be, “of course you would remember/believe/testify this way”). Show incentive without being mean (you’ve been in prison for two years? Your sentenced to ten? You miss your kids? Your wife? MIlestones? But if you say something you get out in a year?

26
Q

leading on redirect?

A

Can do so a little more

27
Q

Apologizing in court?

A

Don’t apologize for being in court. Don’t apologize for objecting. Don’t apologize for representing your client. Don’t apologize for standing up. Don’t apologize for taking up time.

28
Q

What should opening be?

A

A good story. In opening you are framing the case and giving the jurors a lens through which they understand the evidence they will be presented with.

29
Q

Waive or defer open?

A

Never.

30
Q

Objectives of opening

A

1) Create a lens for the audience to interpret the evidence, 2) create a filter for acceptance and rejection of the evidence (your’s is logical and reasonable, your opponent’s is scrutinized and hopefully rejected), 3) create a framework for understanding (relationships, conflict, resolution, etc.).

31
Q

opening structure

A

Impact statement, introduction (self and client), narrative, burden of proof, preview witnesses, conclusion.

32
Q

Other tips for oppening?

A

Ingredients: Theme (elevator pitch, 1 sentence, frame the case).
Narrative (start where the story is interesting, scenes, visual, emotional).
Ask yourself: By the end of the opening I need the jury to feel…And then make them feel this way.
Consider not even starting with ladies and gentlemen. Go right into a powerful sentence.
Words, images, theme, scene, anchors (witsa). These are basic elements of your delivery.
In most good stories nouns and verbs are more powerful than adjectives and adverbs.
You need a visual component (word picture and exhibits in opening). What do you want your audience to see?
You need a theme. Weave it throughout your case. It is short. It is catchy. It is memorable.

33
Q

anchoring opening

A

Make scenes. Use anchors. Use your scenes to set your anchors so that movement in the courtroom is purposeful and meaningful. Walk around the courtroom with purpose. Where you walk matters. Know how it looks.
Break courtroom up into locations. Tie locations to scenes. Move to those locations with purpose.
Anchoring cements scenes in jurors memory. It gives you something to do (don’t stand still in the same place). It will keep you from pacing (also not good). Random motion is bad. You will have more power by mapping out where you will be at various points in your opening.

34
Q

different structures for opening

A

Different types (chronological, reverse chronological [start at the end], case of action [starts at the event], neutral observer [describe in third person], relationships, villain as the vehicle [typically openings make the client the protagonist, but you can also make the opponent the bad person and make the jury the hero, this requires that they have to take action to right the wrong]).

35
Q

what does the jury need to save our client? What must thre be?

A

There cannot be motivation to save our client without giving the jury an antagonist to fight against.
You must give the jury a problem to fix.

36
Q

Arguing in opening?

A

Your not allowed to argue your case in opening. But you are arguing your case in opening.
Don’t say things that could begin with “so.” Don’t tell them what the inference would be. Make presentation in a way that they know what the inference will be without you telling them.

37
Q

Evidence will show in opening?

A

“Evidence will show” is a crutch. It is a filler. It takes you out of the story you are trying to tell. If you draw an objection, say the same thing but add in “the evidence will show.”

38
Q

Discussing exhibits in opening

A

Can discuss any exhibits you believe will be introduced. But don’t make promises you can’t keep.

39
Q

demonstratives and exhibits in opening

A

u may use demonstratives and exhibits. Can’t show evidence that hasn’t been admitted???

40
Q

names in opening?

A

Jury will need to know some names. But don’t just throw names at them. Give context. This is the nurse, the doctor, the convenience store clerk. Don’t make them remember names.

41
Q

What happens if wedded to chronology in opening

A

If wedded to chronology (wait I messed up, I have to go back for a second).

42
Q

Tools available for delivery beyond mere words

A

Volume, silence (practice pausing, practice speaking slowly), pitch, speed, etc.

43
Q
A