murder Flashcards

booklet 10

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

definition of murder

A

'’causing unlawful death of a human being under the kings peace with malice aforethought’’- sir Edward Coke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aforethought meaning

A

pre-meditated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what type of offence is it

A

common law offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

actus reus

A

causing
unlawful death
human being
kings peace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

causing

A

usual rules of causation
factual cause (R v White)
legal cause more than de minimus (r v kimsey)
chain of causation (thin skull rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

unlawful death cases

A

Re A (conjoined twins)
Airedale NHS trust v Bland
R v Clegg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when may causing death be legal

A

if d has a valid defense (e.g self defense)
if they are a doctor who is withdrawing treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Re A (conjoined twins)

A

got a court order to say fr can operate on twins- 1 would defo die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Airedale NHS trust v Bland

A

V left in vegetative state so could lawfully have treatment to end his life as wasn’t going to get better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Clegg

A

death was unlawful as self defense was not necessary as there was no longer a threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

of a human being cases (3)

A

AGs ref
R v Malcherek
R v Inglis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AGs ref- what did this tell us

A

foetus is not legally recognized as a human being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Malcherek- what did this tell us

A

someone on life support who is considered ‘brain stem dead’ is no longer alive in the eyes of the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Inglis- what did this tell us

A

a victim with brain damage however severe is still classed as a human being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

under the kings peace meaning

A

a soldier who kills during wartime is not guilty of murder as the death was not under the kings peace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

mens rea
what is malice aforethought

A

intention to kill
or
intention to commit GBH

17
Q

malice aforethought cases- intention to kill

A

R v Mohan
R v Nedrick/R v Woollin

18
Q

R v Mohan

A

was a conscious decision to bring about action

19
Q

R v Nedrick/R v Woollin

A

virtual certain consequence of indirect or oblique intention

20
Q

intention to commit gbh- implied malice cases

A

R v Vickers
R v Cunningham 1982 (diff to usual one)

21
Q

R v Vickers

A

intent and succeed to really hurt someone and they died- them not dying wouldn’t be much different

22
Q

R v Cunningham 1982

A

confirmed R v Vickers is still a good law and that if you intended GBH and not death you’ll still be guilty for murder as that person is just lucky that they didn’t kill the victim