diminished responsibility Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what type of manslaughter is this under (voluntary or involuntary)

A

voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

whats the act that this comes under

A

Homicide Act 1957, s.2 as amended by Coroners & Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 4 requirements of using the defense

A

An Abnormality of Mental Functioning

Caused by Recognized Medical Condition

Substantially Impairs D’s ability

And Provides an Explanation for D’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

abnormality of mental functioning meaning (by case- be specific)

A

“a state of mind so different from ordinary human beings that the reasonable man would term it abnormal”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

case that gave the abnormality of mental functioning definition

A

R v Byrne (d was a sexual psychopath who had ‘irresistible impulses’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does a recognized medical condition need to be recognized by

A

World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
can be physical or mental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what case confirmed this and what did it tell us

A

r v dowds
The medical evidence must show that
the condition caused the abnormality
of mental functioning.
This does not include voluntary intoxication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does ‘substantially impairs’ stop d from being able to do to (3)

A

understand the nature of D’s conduct (behaviour) (e.g d has severe learning difficulties);
to form a rational judgment (e.g d has schizophrenia);
to exercise self-control (r v byrne- impulses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what case proved this

A

R v Golds
does not have to be total impairment, but it should be more than minimal and the judge can advise the jury that this needs to be ‘large’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Provides an explanation meaning

A

There must be a causal link between D’s abnormality of mental functioning and killing

It does not need to be the sole cause or even the most important cause, but it must be more than a trivial factor.

The defence should not succeed where the medical condition made no difference to their behaviour (e.g. they would have killed anyway)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

intoxication (3 exceptions)

A

Intoxication alone cannot be enough for Diminished Responsibility. However, courts will allow D’s intoxication to be taken into account if:
D has brain damage as a result of alcohol misuse
D is intoxicated involuntarily – either through being spiked or through alcohol dependency
D was intoxicated but also has a recognised medical condition which remained the cause of the killing, despite the intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

D has brain damage as a result of alcohol misuse case

A

R v Wood 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

D is intoxicated involuntarily – either through being spiked or through alcohol dependency

A

R v Wood 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

D was intoxicated but also has a recognised medical condition which remained the cause of the killing, despite the intoxication

A

R v Dietschmann 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly