actus reus and omission Flashcards
booklet 2
what is actus reus
physical element of a crime
general rule for actus reus
The act or omission must be voluntary on the part of the defendant
Hill v Baxter 1958 result
The judge said this did not count as an ‘involuntary action’, but that the following could cause an involuntary reaction whilst driving:
Heart attack
Being attacked by a swarm of bees
Being hit on the head by a stone
‘trance-like’ state was his fault as he should have taken a break wehn driving
what counts as an involuntary action
reflex action
muscle spasm
sneezing
a pushes person b who knocks into c
how is actus reus proven in a criminal case
Forensics / DNA / Fingerprints
CCTV
Witnesses
Confessions (if true!)
Experts (medical / ballistics)
how is mens rea proven in criminal cases
Explanations given at trial – by defendants, victims and witnesses
types of actus reus
Conduct Crimes
Consequence (Result) Crimes
Circumstance Crimes
conduct crime
These are crimes where the actus reus – the guilty action required – is the prohibited conduct itself
example of act
s.170 Road Traffic Act 1988
It a criminal offence to fail to stop at the scene of an accident
Merely driving away from an accident you caused, is an offence
Consequence (‘Result’) Crimes
a crime which causes or results in specified consequences. For example, murder requires proof that someone is killed. F
example of act
s.47 Offences against the Person Act 1861
There must be an application or threat of unlawful force which results in ‘actual bodily harm’ - an injury must occur to V.
Without the injury there can be no crime
Circumstance (‘State of Affairs’) Crimes
These are crimes where the actus reus exists when a ‘state of affairs’ exists – meaning a particular set of circumstances. These usually involve ‘being’ something rather than ‘doing’
example of act
s.1 Prevention of Crime Act 1953
The crime is being in possession of a weapon in a public place
D does not have to do anything with the weapon, nor does it have to be visible. It is enough that he has it with him in a public place
actus reus cases (2)
Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent 1983
R v Larsonneur 1933
Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent 1983
D was moved by police out of a hospital and onto the highway.
He was then charged with ‘being drunk on the highway’.
He was guilty even though he was not there voluntarily.