Multiple Parties & Claims Flashcards
Joinder of Claims
Plaintiff may join any claims she has against the ▵
Permissive Joinder
Plaintiff may join if:
- Plaintiff’s claims arise from same transaction or occurrence AND raise a common question of law or fact
Compulsory Joinder of Necessary Parties
Non Ps required to be joined if they’re nec & indispensable Parties to the action (MUST Join)
- All Ps required to give complete relief to everyone
Compulsory Joinder - Necessary Parties
- Court can’t give complete relief without them
- Missing party’s interests would be harmed
- Missing party’s claims would subject other party to incur multiple liability
- Joint Tortfeasors are NOT necessary parties
Compulsory Joinder - Jurisdictional Requirements
- Personal Jurisdiction, AND
- Joinder will not destroy diversity
- If it does, court can dismiss or
- proceed if it believes it can give effective relief
Compulsory Joinder - Effect of Failure
Court can proceed w/out the necessary party or dismiss entirely,
- Factors considered when determining to dismiss or proceed:
- Is there an alternative forum available?
- What is the actual likelihood of harm?
- Can court shape relief to avoid harm?
- If dismissed - Party is referred to as indispensable
Counterclaim
Claim against opposing party
Compulsory Counterclaim
Arises out of the same transaction or occurrence
- Waived if not filed - if ▵ doesn’t plead comp. CC in answer, claim can’t be asserted in another action
- Supplemental Jurisdiction
- YES, Comp CC falls within Supp J b/c arises out of same transaction or occurrence
- No limitations b/c asserted by ▵ (Such as to destroy complete diversity)
Permissive Counterclaim
Does not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, ▵ may assert permissive counterclaim in another action
Cross-Claim
Against Co-party
- Must arise out of same transaction or occurrence (Always permissive, never compulsory)
- Supplemental Jurisdiction - Yes, arises out of same transaction or occurrence
- Limitations apply, can’t use SJ to overcome complete diversity
Impleader
▵ who believes 3d P is liab. to her for all (Indemnification) or part (Contribution) of Plaintiff’s claims against the ▵ may implead them as 3d P ▵
- ▵ must be claiming derivative liability (Indemnification or contribution),
- Can’t just blame a 3d party
- Normal pleading rules apply
Impleader - Timing
Within 14 days of answering complaint or by leave of court
Impleader - Requirements
- File Third Party Complaint
- Serve Process on Third Party ▵ (Personal Jurisdiction)
- SMJ - Diversity, Federal Question, OR Supp. J
- Avail. since claim for indem. or cont. will arise out of common nucleus of operative fact
Interpleader
Used when stakeholder has property and 2 or more others claim ownership
- forces all claimants into single suit b/c the Plaintiff doesn’t want to be exposed to multiple liab. or inconsistency
Statutory Interpleader
Easier then rule 22
- doesn’t require complete diversity,
- has relaxed venue &
- nationwide service of process
Statutory Impleader - Jurisdiction
- Minimal Diversity - only 1 claimant must be diverse from 1 other claimant AND
- AIC = $500 or more
Interpleader - Venue
Any district where any claimant resides
Statutory Interpleader - Service of Process
- Nationwide
- no PJ issues
In a statutory interpleader case, where does a federal court have jurisdiction?
Nationwide