Multifactorial: Lect 19 Flashcards
Single gene
- determined by the alleles at a single locus
- characterized by their patterns of transmission in families (AD, AR, XL D/R)
- chrom abnormalities
- mitochondrial
- ex: SCA, CF, DMD
Multifactorial/complex
- genes + environment
- congenital malformations
- acquired diseases of childhood and adult life that don’t display clear menedlian pattern of inheritance but show familial aggregation.
- majority of diseases in human popuations.
- don’t produce discrete phenotype/genotype
- due to more than one gene affecting the trait
- additive or non-additive alleles
Polygenic
- mutations or variants in more than one gene contribute to the trait.
- ex: multiple genes affecting ht. = nl or Gaussian distribution.
Continuous phenotype
- number of genes controlling the trait determine the extent of phenotypes observed.
- more genes = broader range of phenotype
Liability/threshold model:
- Liability:
- Threshold:
- describes a population’s genetic and environmental susceptibility
- used to identify recurrence risk in families.
- all factors that contribute to the disease = liability
- quantitative variable to cause expression of abnl phenotype.
Familial relative risk:
- the more closely related you are to someone w/ a complex disorder, the more likely you are to have some of the same alleles.
- risk drops by half for every degree distance from affected person.
Familial aggregation and relative risk
-measured by comparing the freq. (prevalence) of the disease in relatives of an affected proband w/ its freq. in the general population.
- the larger the λr, the greater the fam. aggregation.
- increase in heritability = incr genetic contribution.
Liability threshold model:
- risk of recurrence is higher in relatives of severely affected indiv.
- recurrence risk is high in close relatives and decreases rapidly in more distant relations.
- incr. risk if more than one close relative is affected
- in sex biased traits (ex. pyrloric stenosis more common in males)
Pyloric stenosis
males are more prone and have a lower liability threshold
- the children/siblings of an affected female are more at risk of having the condition
- her sons/brothers are more at risk than daughters/sisters.
Multifactorial inheritance examples?
-Anencephaly and Spina bifida
Tools for determing genetics vs. environment
- population/migration studies: indicative of environmental factors (ex: breast cancer low in Asian women but after immigrating to the US, increase in incidence)
- family studies: similar to twin but not as precise. “more genetic variability”
- twin studies
- adoption studies: separation of identical twins = same genes but diff envir.
- assoc. studies: to test the co-occurrence of a specific allele at a marker locus and a trait in population by comparing the freq. of an allele in pts and controls. Don’t analyze familial inheritance patterns.
Twins:
Monozygotic:
Dizygotic:
- derived from a single ovum
- genetically identical except mitochondrial.
- from two ovas but share intrauterine envr.
- 50% identical (siblings)
Concordance:
Discordance:
-both twins have the same disease.
-If concordance = 100% then disorder is genetically determined
If concordance is less than 100% then non-genetic factors are involved.
Discordance: one twin has it but the other doesn’t
-The greater discordance = the greater environmental input
Limitations of twin studies
- underestimate heritability
- MZs have different genes (mitochondrial) and epigenetic differences.
- different environmental exposures
- diff genes in diff twin pairs
- ascertainment bias