MULTI STORE MODEL Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Different stores in sensory memory?

A

Iconic,Haptic and Echoic store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Who made the MMS?

A

Atkinson and shiffrin 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 ways information is affected by?

A

Capacity,encoding,duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Beliefs of MMS.

A

Memory is a flow of info through info processing system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does the STM code information?

A

Acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does the sensory memory code information?

A

Visual and auditory, tactile coding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Coding for LTM?

A

Semantic coding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sperling 1960

A

Study into sensory memory.
Tested recall by presenting three rows of letters of 4.
Top.middle.bottom…..three different tones.
Participants estimated recall was 9-10 letters presented from the 12.
Because…. Visualising pictures easily forgotten.
Use of Echoic and Iconic store.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Forgetting if the STM?

A

Displacement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Forgetting of the LTM?

A

Interference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Factors that should be considered about memory stores?

A

Duration
Capacity
Coding (storing info)
Forgetting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Free recall task

A

A way of testing memory-random order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recency effect?

A

Remember last few things because they are in STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Primacy effect?

A

Rehearsed and in LTM can be retrieved when needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Serial position curve?

A

Represent a difference between STM AND LTM by influencing one part of curve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Glanzer and cunitz - Evidence between distinction between STM and LTM

A

1966- showed functional dissociation.
List of words presented one at a time.
2 conditions.
1-Retrieve &Report straight after.
2- Distractor task counting backwards for 30secs.
C1- serial position curve.»» REHEARSED WORDS IN LTM. FIRST WORDS.
C2- Disrupted recency effect last words not recalled well.» STM

17
Q

Glanzer 1972-Factors affecting serial position of curve but not other.

A
  1. Rate of presentation
  2. Age of ppt
  3. Familiarity of words
    Good support for idea that STM and LTM are separate.
18
Q

Case study that supports distinction between different stores.-

A

1966-HM- man had severe epilepsy and had brain surgery.
Severe memory deficits. Able to recall events in early life but not events 10years before.
Read magazine over and over again.
Intact STM but LTM was defective. Not able to retrieve new memories or lay some down.

19
Q

Shallace and Warrington study 1970

A

KF MOTORBIKE ACCIDENT.
INTACT LTM BUT STM WAS DAMAGED.
STM» recency effect of only one item.
Couldn’t keep verbal information.

20
Q

Peterson and Peterson

A

1959-
Trigrams -three random consonants.
Then had to recall them after regular intervals 3,6,9,12…..
During pause they were asked to count backwards in threes = interference task.
Recall got worse
80% correct recall at 10secs
10% correct at 18secs.
Affects on duration .
If rehearsal is prevented there would be more of a negative affect on recall.Little info remains in STM for 18secs.

21
Q

Bahrick et al (1966)

A

Investigated LTM…
392ppts.
List names of Ex classmates.- free recall test.
Photo recognition test given or name recognition test given.«< retrieval cue.
90% of names and faces recognised.&laquo_space;60% accurate on free recall
After 30yrs…..declined 30%
After 48yrs name recognition was about 80% accurate.
Photo recognition 40% accurate.

22
Q

Jacobs- capacity of STM

A

1887- string of letters/digits had to repeat back in same order. Increase if recall wasn’t correct.
Ppts recalled about 9digits 7letters. Capacity increased with age and childhood.
Conclusion–STM limited storage of 5-9 items.
Memory techniques,age and capacity affected recall.
Less digits offered better recall.

23
Q

Miller -

A

1956- remember about seven items in STM
Capacity of STM is 7+- 2.
Use CHUNKING to combine individual letters or numbers into larger more meaningful units.

24
Q

How does information enter our brains?

A

Sensory memory,STM,LTM

25
Q

Bahrick and Hall

A

1991- studied maths at high school
People who tried to recall showed steady decline.
If there was better understanding there would be better memor

26
Q

Baddeley - encoding study

A

1966- four sets of words
Acoustically similar or semantically similar
And semantically dissimilar
Independent groups design.
Ppts asked to recall words immediately or after 20mins
Pots had problems recalling acoustically similar words immediately after and if recalled after interval they had problems with semantically similar words.

LTM RELYING ON SEMANTIC CODING AND STM ON ACOUSTIC.