MTII (Cobb Articles) Flashcards
What are the two objectives of the communications plan suggested by Cobb?
a. Objective 1: To develop relationships with reporters and editors working for major media outlets, both electronic and print, in order to encourage the inclusion of the peak oil perspective in applicable stories.
b. Objective 2: To provide materials and information for public education purposes aimed at policy makers and general audiences
How should the organization efforts be organized?
a. “…need to be organized around a set of consistent messages that are easy to communicate and easy for the listener to understand.”
An audience expects what?
a. “Since ASPO will primarily be focused on an American audience, it is important to understand that the audience is accustomed to happy endings.”
What assumption do ASPO members share?
a. “… as a matter of consensus we share a view that something can be done to mitigate the effects of oil… ASPO does believe as an organization that vast changes are in store for the world and for American society in particular.”
Audiences are accustomed to what?
a. Happy endings
What are the two scenarios described by Cobb?
a. “Do-Nothing” Scenario which would outline the many tragedies that will befall us if we simply do nothing to prepare… will be dismissed as improbable because we won’t just sit around and do nothing as a society
b. “Sensible responses” scenario can provide a basis for action that will lead to what feels like a happy ending, that is, happy on comparison to “Do Nothing.”
Be familiar with the Official Story suggested in the article.
a. There is a problem with oil but there is enough left for the transition to alternative fuels to be seamless. It needs to be undermined for the public to act on the peak oil story.
What are the three legs of the ASPO storyline suggested by the author?
a. 1st leg: the undermining of the official story
b. 2nd leg: explanation of oil – explain the idea of peak oil simply and clearly
c. 3rd leg: two-scenario scheme – allows people to find a path to action without giving them unrealistic expectations about a post peak world
What are the three parts of the suggested communication program?
a. Public Education
b. Event Publicity
c. Media Relations
What does the author conclude about crisis publicity?
a. ASPO is convinced oil will peak soon and that the run-up to the peak will be punctuated with crises… If ASPO cultivates a network of peak-oil aware reporters, crisis publicity will be much easier to manage.”
What does the author claim about the role of free media?
a. “It has more credibility and it’s cheap. (Free media is seen as more credible because what receives news coverage is determined by reporters and editors who are presumed to be independent of their sources)
What is the main point of this article (see first three paragraphs).
a. World’s energy optimists usually use a different lexicon (or word bank) to state their case and basically their arguments cannot be easily implemented.
What is the problem with “above-ground factors”?
a. Above-ground factors – optimists argue that there is plenty of oil, usually for many decades to come, as long as “above-ground factors” don’t prevent it’s extraction. These include wars, social unrest, lack of investment, environmental restrictions on drilling, and political restrictions.
b. The problem with this is these factors are easily fixed or solved. On top of that, the oil industry is both an above-ground and below-ground system.
What are the two problems with “at current rates of consumption”?
a. First problem is the rates of consumption are not steady and they are growing exponentially.
b. The second problem – fossil fuels are finite and that means that their rate of production will peak long before we run out of them. This decline in the rate of production after the peak poses serious problems for world society whose systems are based on ever-increasing rates of energy consumption.
Why is “clean coal/carbon capture and sequestration” a troublesome set of phrases?
a. “Clean coal” is often used to mean only the removal of harmful pollutants, but not the sequestration of carbon dioxide. This means the green house problem is still in effect.