MT3- endo Flashcards

1
Q

Where is the decision maker point for sorting of proteins in pathways?

A

TGN- adapter proteins important for this e.g. AP3 for ALP pathway to lysosome, or AP1 or Gga 1/2 (CPY bound to VPS10)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

TGN sorting station for?

A
  1. Sorting of newly synthesised lysosomal proteins
  2. Sorting between constitutive and regulated secretory pathways
  3. Sorting to apical and basolateral membranes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WHat can interfer with TGN sorting?

A

viruses e.g. HIV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

HIV uses endocytic pathway how?

A
  1. major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class 1 (antigen presenting to cytotoxic T-cells )- binds more to AP1 so material gets degraded, avoiding immune response.
  2. Tethrin downregulation- enhances binding to AP1 also. This causes viral retention else so can’t spread.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mocha mouse mutation? phenotype?

A

AP3 or AP1- tyrosine oxidase not secreted which is used to make melanin, hence the ligher colour. Also has immune problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Different motifs that are recognised by endosomal adapter proteins? (3)

A

Tyrosine based YxxΦ
- lysosomes, basolateral, somatodendritic domains. e.g. Transferin receptors
Dileucine based- e.g. Ach transporter, Kex2,
Ubiquitin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

recognition of AP1 proteins by what? Also need?

A

The mew subunit of AP1 and also needs PI4P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

COPII used for?

A

ER to Golgi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

AP2 used for?

A

From the PM to early endo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

COPI used for?

A

Through the golgi.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Retromer used for?

A

late endosome to golgi e.g. recycling Vps10.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AP4 used for?

A

TGN to endosome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AP5

A

late endosome to golgi retrival. Recyling components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defects in AP-4 or AP-5? Why?

A

Neurological problems,
e.g. recessive LOF of AP4= spastic paraplegia, fever sensitive seizures, and development delays.
Found my whole genome sequencing.
Poor removal of aggregates in neurons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gga1 and 2 used for?

A

late golgi to late endosome, e.g. CPY bound to VPS10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ALS mutation?

A

in AP4? CHECK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are MCS?

A

Inter-membrane contact sites- denser areas where organelles contact. 30nm apart no actual fusion but tethered proteins connect them.
e.g. ER touching PM, endosomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who first saw MCSs?

A

Porter and Palade 1956- protein bridges connect ER and endosome under electron microscope.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Purpose of MCSs? (3)

A
  1. Provide a platform for signaling
  2. Lipid exchange between organelles
  3. Important for muscle Ca stores- myopathies if defected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the two problems with adapter protein sorting?

A

Proteins need a very specific cellular location but

a. Cargo present in more than one location
b. μ subunits recognizes similar signals e.g. YxxPhi recognised by AP1 and AP2

Doesn’t help specificity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Solution to the problems of u subunits recognising similar signals etc?

A

CO-INCIDENCE DETECTION.

not only the adapter but also PI’s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Location of different Rabs on organelles?

A
Rab 4- early endosome to PM
Rab 5-Pm to Early endo
Rab 7- early endo to MVB
Rab 11- early endo to recycling compartment
Rab 9- MVB to TGN
Rab 1,6- Golgi
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

AP2 structure?

A

alpha-
Beta subunit- clathrin box to bind clathrin
u- cargo binding motif of YxxΦ or Phi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

YxxΦ (or Phi)

is what?

A

the cargo motif that AP2 u subunit recognises. (and AP1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Phosphoinositide binding with adapters?

A

AP1 needs PI4P

AP2 needs PI(4,5)P2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Why is coincidence detection important for enodcytic pathway?

A

Phosphoinsositides are in low abundance but define organelle identity.
Adapter recognises PI first then sees cargo with the motif.
PI- ensures correct destination- just another quality control step.
Also creates specific zones within the organelle as welll.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

AP2 KO?

A

In yeast- survive- shows there is a bigger picture and suggests redundancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Evidence that the adapter proteins may not tell the whole story?

A
  1. AP2 KO yeast- still survive.
  2. EGF uptake AP2 KO doesnt affect RNAi.
  3. The finding of CLASPS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

ER contact site regulation example?

A

Wu et al 2018. ER tubules contact other organelles e.g. surround the areas where cargo buds off an endosome, helping it to bud off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Evidence of distinct localisation of Adaptors?

A

Robinson (2004) Immunoflouroscence. Cell fixed, AB specific to complexes, and secondary antibodies. Shows very strong distinct localisation of adapters with little overlap.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

How are specific PIs ensured at right location?

A

Lots of kinases and phosphatases that can convert between phosphoinisitol. The enzymes are key that the right PIs are at the organelle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Experimentally how is location of PI seen?

A

Detect an enrichment- follow localisation. Phosphoinositide location can be seen by GPF tagged to the PI binding domains.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

AP1 and AP2 and PI’s also bind?

A

Many other proteins also, especially PI(4,5)P2 involved in co-incidence detection. Role in coated-Pit formation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

RNAi KO of AP2

A

Scotty Robinson-
if give radioactive transferrin over time more and more is uptaked. KD clathrin or AP2 basically stop, showing is necessary for uptake.
Whereas EGF only Clathrin KD reduces uptake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Theory of alternatives to adapter proteins?

A

CLASPS act as alternative adapters, bind clathrin, cargo and PI’s. Some also do bind AP2 adapters also.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Example for an alternative adapter than AP2 etc

A

B-Arrestin alternative adapter essential for GPCR uptake- target for 40% of prescription drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Why have alternative adaptors?

A

Allows more specificifiy for particular cargo. Can upregulate or down an adapter if lots of one cargo type etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

PI at PM?

A

PI(4,5)P2 (think at pm as ccan be broken down to IP3 and DAG)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

PI at early endosome?

A

PI3P (stage 3 up from lysosome, late endo, then early)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

PI at TGN?

A

PI4P(one before early endo- 4th stage back)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

PI(3,5)P2 role?

A

important sorting signal (look up)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What are Rabs? location?

A

Small GTPases, members of Ras superfamily, distinct subcellular location, recycle between membrane and cytosol.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

How many mammalian Rabs?

A

60

44
Q

Which rabs are at the golgi?

A

Rab 1 and 6

45
Q

How are Rabs activated?

A

in GDP state inactive

In GTP state active

46
Q

Rabs function?

A

Ensure cargo goes to the right place.
Attach to vesicles, acting as an address system for the vesicles to the target, as they too have specific Rab effectors on the target to bind to. This brings the membranes close so that SNARES can bind.
They can create specific microdomains on organelles

47
Q

What recruits Rabs to the membrane surface? role?

A

GEFs in the membrane- Guanine exchange factors, these then activate the Rab replacing the GDP with GTP. Alters conformation of Rabs so GDP falls off and GTP can bind.

48
Q

WHat activates Rabs?

A

GEFs replace GDP with GTP. Alters conformation of Rabs so GDP falls off and GTP can bind.

49
Q

Rabs role sequence of events?

A
  1. GEF recruits and activates the Rabs (GDP-GTP)
  2. Rab incorporates into the vesicle.
  3. Vesicle pinches off, trafficks to target membrane.
  4. Vesicle tethered by rabs to rab effectors and SNAREs interract
  5. Vesicle fuses and GTP hydrolysed into GDP by rab GAPs.
  6. GDI (GDP dissociation inhibitor) chaperone removes GDP-Ras out of membrane into cytoplasm to recycle.
50
Q

What inactivates Rab proteins?

A

The hydrolysis of GTP to GDP by GAPs (Guanine activating protein- activate the GTPase activity) but cause their inactivation- mind the gap

51
Q

WHat causes the dissociation of rabs from the memebrane to recycle?

A

GDI (GDP dissociation inhibitor) as when in GDP state causes the dissociation which inhibits its function, recycling it

52
Q

Experiment to evidence Rab5 role?

A

Previous work shown GTP-gamma S stimulates endocytosis.
Overexpress consitutively active Rab5Q79L (mutant with reduced GTPase activity) and electron microscopy saw this results in the formation of an enlarged endosome as vesicles keep being endocytosed to the endosome from PM.

53
Q

Rab5 binds to what in early endosomes?

A

Appl1- Rab effector present on early endosomes. Causes the tethering of vesicles.

54
Q

3 roles of rab proteins in endocytosis?

A
  1. Tethering of vesicles to targett membrane (bind to rab effector)
  2. Bind to actin and MT to aid movement of vesicles.
  3. Clathrin vesicle cycle
55
Q

Experiment to see Rab5 effectors?

A

1999 Nature publication:
GST-pull down experiments, Bead to GST epitope tagged GTP-Y S Rab5. See what is pulled out but isn’t in GDP locked form:

EEA1 (endo resident protein)
Rabaptin (vesicle tether)
Rabex 5 (GEF)
Appl1 (rab effector protein)

56
Q

WHat is Rabex? Why was this pulled out in the 1999 paper?

A

GEF- surprising this is pulled out with Rab-GTP as would normally be bound to GDP form to convert.
Explaination: it was bound to rabaptin not directly bound.

57
Q

What is Rabaptin?

A

long coiled coil that tethers vesicles to the endosome.

58
Q

How can the same effectors channel different outcomes in organelles?

A

Appl1 paper Schenck et al, (2008)
e.g. AKT can cause multiple pathway outcomes, but if trafficked to the endosome with Appl1 present (non-cononical), GSK-3B is recruited and cell survival is signalled, whereas TSC2 in cytosol is recruited to AKT at the PM .

59
Q

What was known before the APPL1 journal?

A

Schenck et al 2008-
Rab5 known as a sorting signal to the endosome. And that APPL1 binds to Rab5 (1999 GST-pull down).
AKT known to signal at the PM but suspected signalling after internalisation.

60
Q

Hypothesis of APPL1 journal?

A

The spatial distribution of signalling proteins may contibute to signalling specificity, causing a channeling of certain pathways

61
Q

APPL1 journal experiment 1?

A
  1. Zebrafish can be used as model- APPL1-80% conserved. APPL2-65%. And that APPL1 colocalises with endosomes, and this is enhanced during AKT signalling. (CFP- Tagged Rab5c and APPL1-venus)
62
Q

APPL1 journal middle experiments?

A

Ubiquitously expressed but concentrated in certain areas e.g. notocord, olfactory placode etc.
Loss of APPL1 leads to tissue specific apoptosis- MO to KD. V strong apoptosis in Forebrain.
Western blot showed decreased P AKT also.
Rescue apoptosis by adding APPL1 mRNA to moderate apoptosis, also AKT rescue.

63
Q

APPL1 journal last experiments?

A

Two downstream pathways of AKT: GSK-3B and TSC2.
In KD of APPL1- Western blot shows reduction in P-GSK-3B (transiently associated with endosomes) but not TSC2. Yet inhibiting PI3K stops P of both.

GSK-3B, AKT colocalise on APPL1 endosomes- flourescently tagged, much x4 more than cononical (non APPL1) endosomes.

APPL1 overexpression phenotype v similar to AKT2. But needs endosomal location- venus bulky tag- excluded from nucleus=pheno, but if fails to associate with endo or NLS no pheno.

64
Q

Example of Rabs creating microdomains?

A

APPL1 2008 Schenck et al.

APPL1 endosomes- AKT to GSK-3B signalling.

65
Q

How do Rabs make microdomains?

A
  1. GEF ahppens to be near, recruits Rab 5 and activates it.
  2. Recruits effectors e.g. rabaptin (tethering) which is complexed with Rabex (GEF).
  3. This can then recruit and activate other Rab5s.
  4. Lots accumulate, and tethering proteins.
66
Q

Why is MVB called that?

A

Due to reverse budding events, into the late endo to make interluminal vesicles.

67
Q

Signal to movemt into lysosomes?

A

ubiqutin. Reversible post translational modification

68
Q

How can show necessity/sufficiency of ubiquitin? (general)

A

KO the lysines that ubiquitin binds to so cannot be. See if still gets to the lysosome?

Add ubiquitin to a protein that wouldnt normally go to lysosome- does it?

69
Q

Experiment how to test sufficiency of ubiquitin?

A

Raiborg (2002)
Fluorescent transferin and fusion protein to ubiqutin. This inhibited the recycling back to the PM after internalisation.
Interraction with Hrs was seen (pulled out together immunoblot) and colocalisation with lysosomes is seen.

70
Q

Experiment to find Hrs and Clathrin colocalisation? (first two steps)

A

Raiborg (2002)
Previous experiments found using confocal immunofluorescence that Hrs and Clathrin colocalise on endosomal microdomains.
Experiments on human melonoma cells- cyoimmunoelectron microscopy- found Hrs present in flat clathrin coats at endosomes, but not all so two types?

71
Q

Experiment on evidenced Hrs and ubiqutin?

A

(Raiborg 2002)
Knowing that Hrs has a UIM domain which in drosophila interracts with ubiquitin, investigated whether mammalian did.
incubated pig brain cytosol in the presence of agarose beads with covalently linked ubiquitin. SDS PAGE and Immunoblotting showed that Hrs was pelleted with the ubiquitin beads, but not with agarose beads containing protein A (without ubiquitin).
Y2h screen UIM and Ubiquitin also bound therefore direct interaction.
Also in vivo- fluorescent AB to Clathrin, Hrs and EEA1 all colocalise.

72
Q

Overexpress Hrs?

A

Raiborg (2002)
fused Ub-TfR (transferin) and checked function.
Inhibit protein synthesis- immunofluorescent microscopes.
TfR- found at PM and some intracellular
Ub-TfR- significant amount found intracellular
Ub-TfR+ Overexpress Hrs- all intracellular
Ub-TfR + ‘’ but mutant UIM- same as TfR WT.

73
Q

Future of Raiborg (2002) experiments? result?

A

Does Hrs interract with ESCRTs? (2003) Yes Hrs and ESCRT I do and if deplete Hrs SiRNA, found fewer ESCRT I at membranes, therefore causes early recruitment to endosomes.

74
Q

Once cargo in ILV in MVB destined for?

A

degredation in the lysosome.

75
Q

If sort cargo to endosomal limiting membrane?

A

Recycled, or trafficked to the lysosomal membrane.

76
Q

What do ESCRTs do? (general)

A

they bind to ubiquitinated cargo and transport them from early to late endosomes. Reverse topology budding.

77
Q

How do ESCRTs work? (6)

A
  1. ESCRT-0 bind to Ubiquitnated cargo (via Vps’s and other componets) UIM of Hrs binds U cargo.
  2. Hrs FYVE domain binds to PI-3P on endosome and recruits other ESCRT complex.
  3. Vps of ESCRT-0 binds to Vps of ESCRT-I.
  4. Vps of ESCRT binds to Vps of ESCRT-II etc until whole complex (0-III) at endosome. III- deubiquitinates cargo.
  5. vps4 recruited and this forms a pore enabling the entry of cargo.
  6. The ESCRT complex disassmbles and this creates the formation of a MVB.
78
Q

ESCRT complex?

A

Made of ESCRT 0-III complexes.

79
Q

3 problems assosicated with ESCRTs?

A

retroviruses hijack ESCRTs and use for budding out of cells and spread. Depletes so problems with ERAD and protein degredation

Mutations in can cause cancers
Hrs either overexpression or deletion=tumour.

Neutrodegeneration- ERAD disruption, accumulation of misfolded proteins. Disrupt autophagy e.g. Alzheimers or ALS.

80
Q

ESCRT 0 formed by?

A

Hrs and STAM. Hrs binds to PI-3P avia FVFE domainnd it recognises ubiquitinated cargo via UIM.

81
Q

What is different with the Clathrin lattices at endosomes vs PM?

A

Flat lattices, allows correct cargo incorporation.

Hrs- allows proteins to be concentrated in particular parts of the endosome.

82
Q

EEA1 vs Hrs?

A

EEA1 binds PI3P and Rab5 (coincidence detection)
Hrs binds PI3P but not Rab5.
Different rabs- specificity, normally they are segregated on membrane.

83
Q

What remove ubiquitin from cargo in the endosome? Recycle?

A

Dubs and recycle the ubiqutin (needed for ERAD, so problem recycling causes ER misfolded protein issues)

84
Q

Whats needed for inward budding of cargo to endosome?

A

Vps4 ATPase.

85
Q

Receptors can still signal from …. as well as….

A

endosomes as well as PM

86
Q

what can regulate signalling from a cell?

A

receptor endocytosis, e.g. trafficking to endosome where differernt effectors are and then recylce back to PM, or traffick to lysosome to be degraded, and reduce the number of receptors at surface.

87
Q

Different receptors different location of activity?

A
Di Guglielmo (1994) 
Rat injected with Insulin or EGF into circulation and receptors looked at in liver. 
Both involved the P of tyrosines, but Insulin was likely just at the PM, whereas EGF R  had peak P tyrosines found in the endosome 15minutes after injection. And 60minutes later Ras activity- prolonged signalling from inside the cell in endosome.
88
Q

TGF-B downstream signalling?

A

phosphorylation of Smad2, which is a TF.
translocates to the nucleus, and binds to PIP3. (requires SARA- which is only in endosomes to bind to PI 3P via its FYVE domain)
Therefore needs to be in endosomes?

89
Q

What is the clathrin independent pathway called?

A

Caveolae through lipid rafts (cholesterol)

90
Q

TGF-B are present on PM where? Difference?

A

in clathrin coated pits and Caveolae.
CCP compentant for signalling- internalized into endosome where rich in SMAD2 and SARA. Can recycle back to PM (Rab 11).
Caveolae for receptor degredation.

91
Q

TGF-B receptor colocalisation with markers?

A
Di Guglielmo (2003)
ImmunoFluorescent microscopy see good colocalisation between TGF-B R and EEA1 in endosome in clathrin pathway or Calveolin 1 in independent, but no colocalisation of these two.
92
Q

TGF-B dynamin?

A
Di Guglielmo (2003)
Overexpress mutant dynamin- requires for fission altogether, so niether clathrin or caveolar pathway took place.
93
Q

What evidence suggests that receptors internalised through CCE can be recycled back to the PM?

A
Di Guglielmo (2003)
TGF R colocalised with EEA1 in endosomes also can colocalise with Rab11 which is a PM rab. SARA colocalised also- signalling.
94
Q

How can TGF-B receptor colocalisation be altered?

A
Di Guglielmo (2003)
IMMUNOFLUORESENT MICROSCOPY
 If disrupt the cholesterol in lipid rafts with Nystatin which are important for the caveolae pathway, increased colocalisation with EEA1 from 46 to 79%.

If disrupt clathrin endocytosis by overexpressing mutant which interferes sequests the AP-2 adaptors, inhibited EEA1 colocalisation. Also K depletion needed for lattice assembly.

Dynamin blocks both.

95
Q

Result if block certain TGF-B R pathways?

A
Di Guglielmo (2003)
Can measure P-SMAD to see downstream signalling. 

K depletion- reduced P SMAD.
Dynamin mutant -‘’
Nystatin- slightly increased P SMAD. Stabilised receptors. (half life x3) (Needed for degredation) And cholesterol addition rescued to WT.

96
Q

If low EGF? Vs High conc?

A

Low: Clathrin mediated endocytosis (signalling)
high: ubiquitination- caveolar internalisation (targeted for degredation). If too much, past threshold e.g. stops tumor growth. Desensitisation.

97
Q

What is needed for EGF R degredation? WHy?

A

Rab 7 phosphorylation- movement from early to late endosome.

When high EGF levels

98
Q

What is needed for recycling of EGF?

A

Binding to RCP- rab 11 effector- invlved in recycling to PM.

99
Q

Signalling microdomains called?

A

Signalasomes- Rab proteins involved.

100
Q

What is PIP2?

A

PIP2 is a regulator of endocytosis. Made by PIPKIyi5. Binds to SNX5.

101
Q

WHat affects EGFR signalling?

A

1.Normally EGFR is internalised and degraded over time. PIPKIyi5 KD siRNA, increased P EGFR, P-AKT and P-ERK, enhanced and prolonged signalling and less degraded seen on western blot 0-240mins.
other Isoforms e.g. PIPKIyi2 siRNA not KD.
SNX5 KD same affects also.

2.Immunofluorescence, shows 60mins EGFR still colocalises with EEA1- whereas in WT moves onto colocalise with LAMP1. Problem sorting from endo.

102
Q

PIPKIyi5 interracts with what? Know?

A

Immunoprecipitation- Antisyntaxin 5 AB to bead. Binds syntaxin 5 and also pulls out PIPKIyi5, can see on WB.
GST pull down: SNX5 pulls out, PX domain of SNX5 does, BAR domain doesnt.
Colocalisation of PIPKIyi5, SNX5 and EEA1.

So PX of syntaxin 5 binds

103
Q

SNX5 and PIPKIyi5 necessary for?

A

sorting EGFR into ILV. Seen using Electron microscopy. , EGFRs at limiting membrane of late endosome not sorted into ILV in SNX5 or PIPKIyi5 KD

104
Q

paper on PIPKIyi5 Final figure?

A

SNX5 or PIPKIyi5 KD doesn’t affect EGFR Ubiquitination. His tags Ubiquitins.
SNX5 interaction with PIPKIyi5 inhibits ubiquitin of Hrs. SNX5 without bar domain- not inhibited- Necessary. (myc tag SNX5).
SNX5 and PIPKIyi5 therefore regulate Hrs interaction with EGFRs, which is required for sorting to ILVs.

105
Q

PIPKIyi5 paper explaination?

A

PIPkiyi5 interacts with SNX5 (PXdomain), which generates PI(4,5)P2. Hrs binds to the BAR domain of SNX5 bar domain. This prevents NEDD4-1 binding to Hrs and U Hrs.
Ubiquitination of Hrs prevents it associating with EGFRs and ubiquitinating them. However if SNX5 and PIPKIyi5 there, not U by NEDD so can ubutination EGFR so can be sorted into ILV and degraded.

106
Q

Key findings of PIPKIyi5 paper?

A
  1. KD of PIPKIyi5 inhibits EGFR degredation, remains in EE.

2. PIPKIyi5 interacts with SNX5 via PX. both requied for sorting into ILV.

107
Q

Key findings of PIPKIyi5 paper?

A
  1. KD of PIPKIyi5 inhibits EGFR degredation, increasing signalling, remains in EE.
  2. PIPKIyi5 interacts with SNX5 via PX, both required for sorting into ILV. These colocalise with EEA1.
  3. PIPKIyi5 and SNX5 necessary for Hrs to associate wit EGFR.
  4. SNX5 interaction with PIPKIyi5 present inhibits ubiquitin of Hrs. This prevents Hrs and NEDD4-1 interaction.