MT- secretory Flashcards
Why need membrane trafficking? (3)
- Compartmentalisation: targeting of proteins to specific locations.
- Retrieve proteins back to resident compartment e.g. a receptor to be internalised with antigen etc and need to go back to membrane.
- secretory pathway.
- Endocytic pathway. - for signalling or degradation.
What is constitutive secretion?
Constitutive secretion: Secretion without any signals needed.
What is regulated secretion?
Regulated secretion: Needs sorting signals to say where to go and signals for release.
ER proteins have a ….?
KDEL sequence.
Signal sequence targets proteins to the ER.
e.g. V SNARES etc so can recycle back to the ER.
Organelles ER secretion?
ER- ER Golgi Intermediate compartment (ERGIC or VTC)-Cis Golgi Network- Cis Golgi- Medial Golgi- Trans Golgi- Trans Golgi Network (TGN)- Secretory vesicle to PM.
Organelle order of endocytic pathway?
PM- Endocytic Vesicle-Early endosome- Late Endosome/MVB- intraluminal vesicles- Lysosome for degradation.
Glycosylations are? To where?
addition of a sugar residue to a protein. Either N (Asparagine) and O(found on serine and theonine) linked glycosylations in the ER or Golgi.
What is a common residue sequence sugars can be added to?
In the ER lumen, when theres an asparagine, something, then a serine/theonine (N-x-S/T) motif, a preformed sugar can be added by an oligosaccharidal transferase.
Enzymes that can trim down glycosylations?
Glycosylase.
Experimental evidence for glycosylation?
CFTR glycosylation- band C complex glycosylated in Golgi, or band B core glycosylated in ER.
Know? Delta F508 paper, if force the unconventional pathway (e.g. mutant Sar1, upregulate syntaxin 5 sequests SNARES) which skips the Golgi this can still get to surface but not complex glycosylated, only core. Can see this on western blots as band B has a lower MW.
Purpose of glycosylation?
- Asist and stabilises the folding of the protein.
- Form a site for adhesion to another protein or extracellular matrix. dystroglycan
- Interaction site for ligand. e.g Staphylococcus aureus toxin/
- Can affect trafficking to places on membrane.
- Give protein complexity, depending on enzymes present and levels can give different sugars- gives different properties on different cells etc. e.g. blood type.
Example of glycosylation giving specificity to a protein?
Blood types.
Different O-linked sugars.
Example of glycosylation affecting Interaction site?
Staphylococcus aureus toxin binds to specific sialic acid residue additions(monosaccaride often found at terminal end of oligosaccharides giving protein a negative charge) on certain human cell surface glycosylated proteins. Uses this to get its toxins into cells.
Example of glycosylation giving stability to a protein and interactions with other proteins?
Certain muscular dystrophies are caused by the absence of certain sugars on the protein dystroglycan. It isn’t a defect in a protein but in the sugar addition which normally makes muscles more robust.
Dystroglycan links dystrophin to the extracellular matrix around muscle cells. Its sugars are important for facilitating this interaction. Without dystroglycan people will get muscular dystrophy, but loss of sugars can cause different type.
What might make a model suitable for studies on membrane trafficking?
Simplicity - trafficking occurs on a cellular scale so a single celled organism is likely to provide information.
Analysis of specific types of secretion e.g regulated secretion, would need a model system that is able to perform this function.
Often different systems reveal different information
Positives and negatives of yeast model organisms for membrane trafficking?
Positives:cheap, no ethic problems, genetic studies easy(can grow haploid or diploid), genome sequenced, many conserved paths.
Negative: Limited gene diversity, limited cell-cell contact so unlikely to be informative about multicellularity, small (5µm), so high resolution imaging studies of intracellular compartments is difficult. Has a cell wall which can preclude some types of studies- e.g. microinjection studies.
Study that investigated the secretory pathway in yeast?
Novick and Schekman 1980.
What was the rationale behind the Novick and Schekamn 1980 experiment?
mutate certain genes and if vesicles couldn’t be secreted i.e cells were secretory deficient (sec-), the cell would increase its density as these vesicles accumulate. These cells would also accumulate proteins that are normally secreted (invertase, acid phosphatase).
Novick and Schekamn 1980 experimental procedure to separate sec mutants?
- yeast cells were mutagenized randomly and shifted to a restrictive growth temperature (37°C) and then fractionated in a gradient forming medium.
- A 5% increase in density of the sec mutants gave complete separation from a population of wild type cells.
- The densest 1-2% of cells were tested further (separated by centrifugation.) These were the mutated, and an increase in density was due to an accumulation of cargo that couldnt be secreted.
What did Novick and Schekamn 1980 then do with the sec mutants identified?
- The densest 1-2% of cells were put under electron microscopy to see alterations in the normal ultra-structure of cells e.g accumulation of vesicles or Berkeley body formations inside cell.
- Certain proteins can be detected which are modified at different stages through the secretory pathway (e.g glycosylated or proteolytically cleaved) to see where the mutation was.
- Novick and Schekman analysed cells for their ability to secrete invertase and acid phosphatase at permissive and restrictive temperatures.
How did Novick and Schekman 1980 define secretory mutants?
They defined secretory mutants as those strains which fail to export active invertase and acid phosphatase, but continued to synthesize protein under restrictive growth conditions.(so not synthesis problems) These assays looked for defects in secretion but not establishing the stage of the defect. Invertase- mutants plates did not go brown as they did not secrete this.
How is the ultrastructure of Sec mutants different?
Vesicles budding off golgi or ER are seen in the cytoplasm unable to be secreted. Also formation of Berkleley bodies, double membraned strucures. Discovered in 1980 by Novick and Schekman, of the University of California, Berkeley.
Example of well studied protein that’s modified before being secreted? How is it modified?
Alpha-factor. Made as a Pre-Pro form. Oligosaccharides added, then modified, e.g. mannose added. In late golgi, KEX 2 chops it up into 4 mature alpha-factor proteins. Oligosaccharides function to ensure the protease recognises the protein and folds correctly.
Results of Novick and Schekman experiment?
23 sec genes were identified (genes required for secretion from ER to PM) in Yeast. These could be put into 5 categories Class A-E depending on the stage of the block in secretion.
A- accumulation in cytosol. B- RER, C-ER to Golgi vesicles, D-Golgi, E-secretory vesicles.
Why weren’t all of the genes/proteins involved in the exocytic pathway identified by Novick and Schekman ?
- They only identified temperature sensitive mutants. Not all genes when mutated will cause this phenotype.
- They only considered secretion to the plasma membrane so defects in transport to endosome or vacuole would not be identified.
- Any ‘redundantly’ functioning genes would not be identified. (yeast normally low redundancy- so fewer gene compensation, however is some.)
- Some mutations would have simply killed the cell.
Temperature sensitive mutant vs restrictive vs permissive?
Temperature sensitive mutant- Genes that allow normal function at low temps but altered at high temperatures.
Permissive temp: temp at which a temperature sensitive mutant gene product takes on normal function/phenotype.
Restrictive temp: takes on mutated function i.e. here disturbing trafficking so not secreting.
A vacuole is what?
Bacterial version of a lysosome.
What is a lysosome/Vacuole?
Degradation of extracellular material taken up by endocytosis and autophagy (intracellular components) by degradative/proteolytic enzymes (break peptide bonds). Genetic studies in yeast found this.
How do proteins destined for the lysosome get here?
Active sorting after trans Golgi network to late endosome then to lysosome. Or endocytic sorting to early endo, then late.
Proteins used for Sec mutant studies, and VPS studies?
Sec: invertase and acid phosphatase.
VPS: CPY
Use of CPY experimentally?
Vps (raymond 90’s)
Several labs have used, mutantised cells and see if CPY is secreted.
Carboxypeptidase Y is normally transported from Golgi→Lysosome/MVB, instead of being secreted (mutant).
If it is secreted know there is a mutation. A simple colour change assay could show secretion by using an antibody to CPY and a western blot/ ELISA.This cargo is well studied hence this pathway called the CPY pathway.
Over 60 vacuolar protein sorting (vps) genes have been identified in this way.
Pathway from Golgi to MVB?
CPY- carboxypeptidase Y.
How is CPY modified?
P1- pre-pro form in ER after being cleaved by signal peptidase.
Modified in Golgi=P2. - glycosylation and mannose additions.
Then trafficked to vacuole to be cleaved into the mature form.
Experimental evidence to test VPS?
E.g. Raymond 1992
CPY is normally trafficked from the golgi to vacuole/lysosome (via MVB) where it’s cleaved into the mature form. However, in vps mutant cells, a portion of the p2 (Golgi) form of CPY is secreted from the cell, where it isn’t normally. Depending on which stage the blockage was categories were made e.g.
Over 60 vacuolar protein sorting (vps) genes have been identified in this way.
What is VPS?
Vacuolar protein sorting proteins, involved in the intracellular sorting. (degradation/endocytic tests for sec mutants)
What did Norvick and Schekman 1980 show? (as well as 23 genes)
a secretory protein moves from the cytosol to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), from the ER in vesicles to the Golgi, and then in secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane.
What were the phenotypes of VPS mutants?
They secreted CPY. Class A-F 6 complementation groups. Had different shapes/numbers of vacuoles etc. Different mutant’s depending on where the blockage was before the vacuole.
What were the classes of VPS mutants? (be aware of don’t need to know directly)
A Wild-type: 3–10 spherical vacuoles that cluster in one area of the cytoplasm. In dividing cells, the vacuole extends from mother to daughter cell along the cell axis.
B Fragmented vacuoles: more than 20 small, vacuole-like compartments.
C No identifiable vacuoles.
D Single, large vacuole that fails to extend into daughter cell buds.
E Vacuoles larger than wild-type, with a very large, aberrant late endosome/MVB (the class E compartment) adjacent to the vacuoles.
F One large vacuole surrounded by a number of fragmented vacuole structures.
4 destinations after the Late Golgi? Names of pathways?
Four possible destinations
- To plasma membrane- secretion
- To early endosome
- To late endosome/MVB- CPY
- To vacuole- ALP
What receptor recognises CPY and targets it to the MVB?
sorting receptor Vps10 recognises CPY in the Golgi. Cycles between the late Golgi and MVB- where it dissociates from CPY.