Motivation Flashcards
Salovey & Sluyter (1997)
- Motivation
- Affect
- Cognition
3 fundamental spheres of mental activity
Concerns basic urges such as hunger, sex, thirst, pursuit of friendship
Stanford
marshmallow experiment - delayed gratification. Motivation to not eat it
Skinner
behavioural - extrinsic reinforcement. E.g. dog learns tricks because of food as a reward
Bandura
social learning theory - extrinsic and intrinsic reinforcement. e.g. you have goals, comparing with others, acceptance, schools realise that learning is something in the brain
Weiner - approach
cognitive - intrinsic, what the individual believes about their own stress and failure. Attributions for example
Deci
humanistic - self esteem, self fulfilment, and self determination, and self actualisation
Weiner - theory
- attribution theory
- rational, conscious
- determinates one or others behaviour
- locus of control - internal vs. external
- stable vs. unstable
- controllable vs. uncontrollable
- personal factors - compare self to others
- BUT how do we develop attributions
Implications of attribution theory
- precise feedback
- teach teachers about the attribution theory, so can avoid making biased attributions e.g. ‘this child got a bad mark because he is not intelligent enough for this test’, or ‘he did not work hard enough’… rather than seeing if there was a misunderstanding in his answers
- children taught to vocalise their attributions, so they can be shown to be irrational and can change biased attributions
Ames (1991)
- mastery goal - i want challenging questions, and if i get them wrong I can learn from my mistakes
- performance goal - no mistakes, work hard to get a good mark
- we are motivated to perform goals.
Dweck (2000)
- how we create our goals is down to how we perceive our intelligence
1. entity theorist - intelligence is fixed
2. incremental theorist - intelligence is adaptable and changes. Will seek challenges. Intelligence is adaptable.
Dweck (2012)
teachers who hold entity theory were more likely to give children easy and unchallenging homework, and therefore children had lower motivation to improve. The comforting and kind approach may actually lower motivation, and can demotivate students.
Oxford students - used to being on top, but when not they fail
Juvoven & Weiner (1994)
controllable > uncontrollable
did better academically when students believe that they have more control over their scholastic achievement
Deci, Ryan & Golrick (1986)
children’s perceived rating of parents autonomy (self-geverned ability) and teachers perceived rating of students ability and motivation.
correlation between children’s ability and rated parent self-autonomy. Teaching of parents to students to be self-motivated. Can change way in which parents treat children as well. E.g. giving homework help, but not giving the answers.
Ames (1991) - implication for goal orientated theory
- give children more tasks and learning activities to do
- give implicit and explicit rewards
- balance of authority and responsibility
Deci & Ryan (1985)
self determination theory - intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation, seeking out challenges,