Literacy Development Flashcards
Literacy in Information Stage (2000)
- cross culturally similar, most are good readers
- some outstanding and some illiterate
- UK - the majority of people who cannot read are the older generations
- common misconception that to fix this you need to throw money at the problem
Whitehurst (1988)
- 1 month home based intervention
- parents received instruction to increase the rate of open ended questions
- experimental group scored higher than the control group
Hewison and Tizard (1982)
- listening to children read helps
- extra practice at home - children did better
- collaboration between the teachers and parents
Phillips et al (2005)
- successful phonological awareness is vital
- causal and predictive relationship between phonemic awareness and ease of learning to spell
- pre-school curricula and early childhood educational and caregiving settings
- robust instruction
- need effective strategies
Hannan (2011)
- parental involvement is necessary … only when it is adequate
- reading attainment of working class children
- 3yrs, 76 children
- reading test scores showed no significant improvement effect of parental involvement
- depends on the nature of the home visit, or whether families are from ethnic minorities
- should be continually looked at
Hulme and Snowling (2014)
- there are three predictors of individual differences in children which can be used to assess their early reading development
1. LSK
2. phonemic awareness
3. rapid automatised naming
Muter, Hulme, Snowling and Stevenson (2004)
- also vocabulary is important in learning to read.
Blomert (2011)
- learn relationship between abstract and meaningless 44 phonemes, and equally meaningless 26 letters of the alphabet
- learn GPCs, and then learn that they can be blended together to form meaningful words
Ehri (2014)
- set of stages that a reader progresses through from being a novice (no phonetic knowledge) to a proficient reader (almost automatic recognition of words)
- prealphabetic - no GPCs known
- partial alphabetic (some LSK and are aware of sounds present in spoken words)
- full alphabetic stage (children have learnt sight words by forming complete connections between graphemes in spelling and phonemes in pronunciation)
- consolidated alphabetic (a reader can decode multi-syllabic novel and nonsense words)
- automatic - can decode fluently
Coltheart (2005)
Dual Route Cascaded model
- non-lexical route - regular novel and non-words are read by apply letter-to-sound knowledge
- lexical route - reader looks up word in a mental lexicon - route does not allow the reading of non-words. Straight from visual recognition of word to reading the word.
BUT
- lots of words do not follow simple letter to sound rule e.g. ‘bear’ … /ea/ does not produce an /i/ sound such as in ‘bean’ or ‘lean’, but is pronounced /bɛː/,
Seidenberg (2005)
- reading is developmental and depends on the integrity of phonological and semantic representations in the language processing system before reading even develops
- learning to read is based on the individual creating associations between orthographic, phonological and semantic representations of spoken language corresponding to words.
- Rules are used to pronounce regular words such as ‘lime’, and words that defy the rules are memorised, such as ‘light’
- suggested that therefore reading is ‘quasiregular’ – where there are different degrees of consistency in letter-sound mapping
- each connection is weighted differently, modulating flow of activation. When an individual learns to read, they adjust the weights according to their experience using backpropagation.
Plaut, McClelland, Seidenberg and Patterson (1996)
- when a child is learning to read, they rely mainly on the phonological pathway, but as reading develops, they place a greater emphasis on the semantic pathway, and use expectations of what a word may be in a particular context
- phonological pathway used for novel or pseudo words as reading development matures
Frith (1985)
relationship between reading and spelling
- work out alphabetic sound-letter associations, then extend to reading, then extend orthographic approach to writing
Goswami and Bryant (1990)
- role of phonological skills in reading acquisition
- lack all awareness of sound units relevant to phonetic reading - different levels of sound awareness e.g. syllables - help with early reading
- individual differences in phonological awareness predict reading, and training children with/ at risk of reading difficulties in phonological skills improves reading relative to control group
Ziegler and Goswami (2006)
- study reading cross culturally
- large difference in speed of reading depending on language spoken, and differences in dyslexic behaviour
- differences largely due to differences in transparency and consistency of orthographies