Morphology and word formation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

def.: morpheme

A

smallest linguistic unit with a meaning of its own, basic unit of word formation
and many grammatical processes;

Types:
free, bound, inflectional,
derivational morphemes;
conventionally, morphemes appear in braces ({})

Morphemes can be classified with respect to autonomy, function and position.

autonomy: free or bound
- free morphemes can function independently as words (e.g. town, dog) and can appear within lexemes (e.g. town hall, doghouse).
- bound morphemes appear only as parts of words, always in conjunction with a root and sometimes with other bound morphemes.

further distinction by function:
–> free:
1. lexical (content-word) or 2. grammatical (function-word)
–> bound:
1. lexical: derivational or 2. grammatical: inflectional

position: prefix, suffix
[inflectional bound morphemes never as prefix]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

def.: allomorph

A

realisational variant of a morpheme, e.g. {[s]}, {[z]} and {[Ǻz]} as the
allomorphs of the regular plural morpheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

def.: parts of speech

A

nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

def.: constituents [of clauses]

A

subject, object, complement of subject, complement of
object, adverbial;
seven basic clause patterns in English: SP, SPO, SPA, SPC, SPOO, SPOA,
SPOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How are grammatical relations expressed?

A
Expressed through:
word order
function words
inflection
intonation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the four major types of English morphemes?

A

Free (lexemes)
- free lexical (e.g. table, fire, greed) –> content word

  • free grammatical (e.g. of, to, on - the cover OF the book, give a present TO someone, depend ON) –> function word

Bound (affixes)
- bound lexical (e.g. electro-; -phile) –> derivational affix

  • bound grammatical (e.g. -s for plural; -ed for past) –> inflectional affix
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

word formation strategies

A

major:

  • compounding (typewriter, apple pie)
  • derivation (density, unsavoury)
  • conversion (to partition [a room], to forward [a letter]

minor:

  • clippings (demo, prof)
  • blends (brunch, modem)
  • acronyms/alphabetisms (AIDS, CPU)
  • back-formations (televise, babysit)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What problems remain despite word formation strategies?

Give examples

A

Ex. (1): opaque morphemes and semi-transparent forms
– proceed, recede, succeed, concede, …
– quality (vs. reality, density, etc.) [‘qual’ not a moprheme? but ‘real and ‘dense’ are]
– eatable vs. edible

Ex. (2): interactions between morphology and phonology
– act vs. action, electric vs. electricity

Ex. (3): fuzzy boundaries between derivation and compounding …
– Anglophile / bibliophile / etc. (“neoclassical formations”, “combining forms”) here [prefix is combined with suffix]

Ex. (4): … and between compounds and (syntactic) phrases
– black-board, black market, black tie, White House, green belt, red carpet
– wine merchant, lumber merchant, London merchant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Morphological derivation

A

…in linguistics, is the process of forming a new word from an existing word, often by adding a prefix or suffix, such as un- or -ness. For example, unhappy and happiness derive from the root word happy.

It is differentiated from inflection, which is the modification of a word to form different grammatical categories without changing its core meaning: determines, determining, and determined are from the root determine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

unproductive and productive derivational morphemes - what is the difference?
give examples

A

– unproductive derivational morpheme: -en
harden, whiten, soften, blacken, strengthen, widen, ….
*politen, *hotten, *greenen, *yellowen, …

– productive derivational morphemes: -(e)y, -ish, -type
“I smoke the Toscanelli, a unique kind of cigar or cheroot, which is a cut-down
version of something called a Tosca. It’s a kind of great flaring, trumpet-type
thing of very, very dark black tobacco. I think that they are hand-rolled – I can’t
conceive how machines could make them so idiosyncratic. Even in a pack of
five you will get some that are kind of spindly and fox-turdy … They have a
very strong flavour, they are sort of tetanus-ey and meaty, raunchy and dead
bodyish.” (Will Self, Independent Magazine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Morphology

A

“The branch of lingistics concerned with describing the structure of words, generally separated into onflection and word formation” (Mair)

inflection: inflectional or grammatical endings serve to express grammatical relations in sentences (nouns/pronouns/articles/adjectives: declension; verbs: conjugation)

word formation: Morphological processes that create new words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
By means of which word-formation processes have the following lexems been arrived at?
a) polymorphemic
b) childish
c) to photocopy
d) modernism
e) to bottle
f) pub
...
m) girl friend
n) radio station
o) interpol
A
derivation
derivation
conversion
derivation
conversion
clipping
derivation
...
compounding
compounding
blend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the difference between clipping
and backformation.
Provide two examples each.

A

Clippings (bike, lab) never change
the word class (or the meaning),
backformaJons (editor > to edit, babysijer >
to babysit) frequently do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are endocentric, exocentric, appositive or copulative compounds?
Give examples

A

endocentric: aftertaste, man purse
exocentric: turncoat, paperback
appositive: she-devil

copulative; bittersweet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are neo-classical compounds?

A

They combine forms (e.g. prefix + suffix):

as in biography, photography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

def.: syncretism

A

the fusion of two or more originally different inflectional forms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the difference between isolating, synthetic languages?

A

.An isolating language is a type of language with a very low morpheme per word ratio and no inflectional morphology whatsoever. In the extreme case, each word contains a single morpheme. Currently, the most spoken purely-isolating language is Yoruba.

A closely-related concept is that of an analytic language, which uses little or no inflection to indicate grammatical relationships. Isolating and analytic languages tend to coincide and are often identified. However, analytic languages such as English and Mandarin Chinese? may still contain polymorphemic words because of the presence of derivational morphemes.

Isolating languages contrast with synthetic languages, where words often consist of multiple morphemes.[1] That linguistic classification is subdivided into the classifications fusional, agglutinative, and polysynthetic, which are based on how the morphemes are combined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

fusional, (cumulating) agglutinative languages

A

Fusional languages or inflected languages are a type of synthetic language, distinguished from agglutinative languages by their tendency to use a single inflectional morpheme to denote multiple grammatical, syntactic, or semantic features.
For example, the Spanish verb comer (“to eat”) has the 1st-person singular preterite tense form comí (‘I ate’);
the single suffix -í represents both the features of first-person singular agreement and preterite tense, instead of having a separate affix for each feature.

Examples of fusional Indo-European languages are: Sanskrit, New Indo-Aryan languages such as Punjabi, Hindustani, Bengali; Greek (classical and modern), Latin, Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian, Irish, German, Faroese, Icelandic, Albanian, all Baltic and Slavic languages. Northeast Caucasian languages are weakly fusional.

_____

An agglutinative language is a type of synthetic language with morphology that primarily uses agglutination. Words may contain different morphemes to determine their meanings, but all of these morphemes (including stems and affixes) remain, in every aspect, unchanged after their unions. This results in generally more easily deducible word meanings if compared to fusional languages, which allow modifications in either or both the phonetics or spelling of one or more morphemes within a word, usually shortening the word or providing easier pronunciation. Agglutinative languages have generally one grammatical category per affix while fusional languages have multiple.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Difference between synthetic and analytical languages?

A

In synthetic languages, there is a higher morpheme-to-word ratio than in analytic languages. Analytic languages have a lower morpheme-to-word ratio and higher use of helping verbs and word order. The four subtypes of synthetic languages are agglutinating languages, fusional languages, polysynthetic languages, and oligosynthetic languages.

_____

A synthetic language uses inflection or agglutination to express syntactic relationships within a sentence. Inflection is the addition of morphemes to a root word that assigns grammatical property to that word, while agglutination is the combination of two or more morphemes into one word.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Why are there topological issues in English due to its origins?

A

English changed from inflectional (synthetic) to analytical (isolating) language

  • loss of categories (grammatical gender, most cases, most person marking on verbs, subjunctive)
  • development of categories (continuous aspect, perfective aspect, do-periphrasis)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are some inflectional bound morphemes in Engl?

A
  • nouns (case: genitive, number: plural)
  • pronouns (case, gender)
  • verbs (person, tense, participle)
  • adjectives (now invariant)
  • comparative/superlative (-er/-est vs. more/most vs. irregular forms)
  • adverbs (-ly and irregular)
22
Q

in which ways can allomorphs be conditioned?

A
  • phonological
  • lexical
  • morphological

___
For example, in English, a past tense morpheme is -ed. It occurs in several allomorphs depending on its phonological environment, assimilating voicing of the previous segment or inserting a schwa after an alveolar stop:

as /əd/ or /ɪd/ in verbs whose stem ends with the alveolar stops /t/ or /d/, such as 'hunted' /hʌntɪd/ or 'banded' /bændɪd/
as /t/ in verbs whose stem ends with voiceless phonemes other than /t/, such as 'fished' /fɪʃt/
as /d/ in verbs whose stem ends with voiced phonemes other than /d/, such as 'buzzed' /bʌzd/
23
Q

What is a zero allomorph?

A

E.g one sheep - two sheep

–> belongs to the allomorphs of the plural morpheme but with certain irregular verbs

24
Q

Def.: morphological conditioning

A

Particular morphemes demand a special allomorph if another morpheme it can combine with m

E.g. two allomorphs of ‘courage’

  • in the free morpheme Stress on first syllable
  • in bound morpheme, as in courageous
  • -> the derivation am suffix {-our} triggers the choice of the bound allomorph
25
Q

Def.: Suppletion

+ examples

A

Allomorph resulting from grammatical conditioning neither bears any resemblance to the root morpheme nor is it etymologically related to the latter.

E.g for weak suppletion:

  • buy, bought
  • catch, caught

Strong suppletion:

  • good, better
  • bad, worse
  • go, went
  • be, was
26
Q

Define, give examples and elaborate on the characteristics of he different types of lexical, grammatical and phonological morpheme conditioning

A

Lexical : Which allomorph is used depends on the word(-stem?) itself. E.g. ox requires the plural ending {en} –> oxen
Most free morphemes (formal criterion) are also lexical (function-meaning criterion)

Grammatical: The choice of allomorph depends on
Many bound morphemes perform grammatical functions and vice versa. (Like {-s}, {-es} etc)
But there are also a number of free morphemes with grammatical rather than lexical Funktion. E.g. “Not in the kitchen!” –> only kitchen really lexical
But the other free morphemes “negation”, “locality” and “definiteness”

Phonological:
Allomorphs are chosen depending on the phonological form of the preceding or following part of the word. E.g. {s} in sacks, {-z} in Boys, {-iz} in buses

27
Q

Def.: clitic

A

…is a morpheme in morphology and syntax that has syntactic characteristics of a word, but depends phonologically on another word or phrase.
In this Sense, it is syntactically Independent but phonologically dependent - always attached to a host.
- clitics have the form of affixes but the distribution of function words.
They can belong to any grammatical category but are commonly pronouns, determiners or adpositions (like in, under, before, of, for)

Examples:
- the contracted forms of the auxiliary verbs
I’m and we’ve

  • some view the possessive marker “The Queen of England’s crown” as an enclitic, rather than a (phrasal) genitive inflection
  • Some consider the english articles a, an, the and infinite marker “to” as proclitics
28
Q

Def. Grammar

A

The term grammar is often used to refer to morphology (the study of word forms) and syntax (the study of sentence structure) together.

29
Q

Is “singers” a different word from “singer”?

A

No, it’s just a different form, a so-called “word-form” of the noun “singer”.
“Singer” itself is not merely a word form of sing but a different, new word, which has been formed by affixation of -er to the verb.
–> a new Lexeme, with new entry in dictionary, created by a specific derivational process

30
Q

Neologism

A

a relatively recent or isolated term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been fully accepted into mainstream language.
Neologisms are often driven by changes in culture and technology, and may be directly attributable to a specific person, publication, period, or event.
In the process of language formation, neologisms are more mature than protologisms.

31
Q

What word classes can free morphemes have?

A
  • lexical word class : essentially nouns, verbs, adjectives…
  • -> (also content words) establish a relation between lg and world
  • grammatical or functional word classes:
    articles, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, auxiliaries, etc.
    –> a purely language-internal (grammatical) meaning
    –> practically closed, neologism practically impossible
    –> typically not stressed in connected speech

The difference between the two also often described in terms of “autosemantic” vs “synsemantic” words.

32
Q

What can be said about affixations in English?

A

criterion of position for the classification of morphemes can only be applied to bound morphemes.

Refers to the position of the revenant bound morpheme relative to the modified part of the word (base, root, stem).
affix preceded the base = prefix
affix follows base = suffix

In English:
Prefix - only for the derivation of new lexemes
Suffix - both derivation and inflection

33
Q

portmanteau morphemes

A

A term in which a particular morph instantiates more than one morpheme at the same time, i.e. has several different meanings (like we can put more than one piece of clothing into a “portmanteau” or suitcase)

Example:
/-s/ can indicate third person, singular, present tense and indicative mood all at the same time.

Just like “His” which provides 3 different pieces of info: possessive pronoun, masculine, singular

–> the term p. morph does not apply to homonymous morphs like -er which is used as derivational suffix (deriving noun from verb) and as inflectional suffix in comparative of adjectives

34
Q

How do we call the part of the word to which affixes are attached?

A

Different terms are in use:
“base”
“root”
“stem”

Most general term is base.

To differentiate further…
- what remains when all inflectional suffixes are takes away = stem

  • what remains when taking away all affixes = the root (minimal lexical unit and cannot be morphologically analyzed any further)
  • what remains in each case if the derivational affixes are takes away only by one from the stem = base

Example: “removals”

a: stem -> removal•s (removal)
b: root -> re•mov(e)•al•s (move)
c: base -> remov(e)•als (remove)
d: base -> removal•s, remov(e)•als, re•mov(e)•als

–> thus, “move” alone can be base, root, and stem; this applies to any inflicting mono-morphemic word which also produces derived lexemes.

35
Q

Conditioning of allomorphs

A
  • phonologically conditioned
    e.g. plural /-s/ can be /-Iz/ after sibilants
    /-s/ after voiceless consonants, i.e. not for /s/, “sh” or “tsh”
    or
    /-z/ all other voiced consonants and all vowels

Regularity here: allomorph depends on final sound of word stem

morphological:

  • lexical: restricted to individual lexemes
    e. g ox -> oxen, mouse -> mice
  • grammatical:
    e. g. the inflectional affix conditions the choice of another allomorph (typically the base allomorph)
  • weep -> wept
  • take -> took ; shake -> shook
  • wake -> woke ; break -> broke
  • wife -> wives
  • leaf -> leaves

The conditioning here is restricted to small sets of lexemes (bc not individual lexemes, it’s not lexical)

36
Q

What are the two branches to morphology?

A
  • word formation

- inflectional morphology

37
Q

hapax legomena

A

In corpus linguistics, a hapax legomenon (sometimes abbreviated to hapax) is a word that occurs only once within a context, either in the written record of an entire language, in the works of an author, or in a single text. The term is sometimes incorrectly used to describe a word that occurs in just one of an author’s works, but more than once in that particular work. Hapax legomenon is a transliteration of Greek ἅπαξ λεγόμενον, meaning “(something) being said (only) once”.

Hapax legomenon refers to a word’s appearance in a body of text, not to either its origin or its prevalence in speech. It thus differs from a nonce word, which may never be recorded, may find currency and may be widely recorded, or may appear several times in the work which coins it, and so on.

examples:

Hebenon, a poison referred to in Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ only once.

Satyr, although a common word in English generally, is a hapax legomenon for Shakespeare as it occurs only once in his writings.

38
Q

nonce word

A

A nonce word (also called an occasionalism) is a lexeme created for a single occasion to solve an immediate problem of communication.

Some nonce words may acquire a fixed meaning inferred from context and use, possibly even becoming an established part of the language, at which point they stop being nonce words, while others are essentially meaningless and disposable and are useful for exactly that reason. For instance in child language testing, examples of such words include “wug” and “blicket”.

The term is used because such a word is created “for the nonce” (i.e. for the time being, or this once). All nonce words are also neologisms, that is, recent or relatively new words that have not been fully accepted into mainstream or common use.

39
Q

What are different stages of newly coined lexemes with regard to their establishment in the vocabulary?

A
  • nonce (or: ad hoc) formations
  • institutionalisation
  • lexicalisation

nonce: particularly frequent in advertising and press language. Words created for the moment

institutionalization:
the neologism is also used by other members of the lg community. Along with institutionalisation goes a gradual loss of transparancy and in inclusion of the word in one of the new editions of the dictionaries.

lexicalisation:
the stage in which it is no longer possible for a lexeme to have been formed according to the productive rules of a lg. Phonological lexicalisation, for example, is present in ‚electric‘ ‚electricity‘ or ‚infuse‘ ‚infusian‘. Morphological lexicalisation in ‚length‘ (

40
Q

Types of compounding

A
  • endocentric
  • exocentric
  • appositional
  • copulative
41
Q

Productivity of word formation

  • constraints and blocking
A
  • pragmatic constraints
  • structural constraints
    (phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic)
  • blocking (Bc other word w/ meaning exists or bc the derived word is identical to sth with other meaning)
42
Q

Def.: inflection

A

…is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as

Tense
Case
Voice (passive, active)
Aspect (how it extends over time; e.g. progr.)
Person
Number
Gender
Mood (signals modality; command,fact,desire)
Animacy (also semantic; who vs what)
Definiteness (usually marked by determiner)

43
Q

What word formation processes are there? Comment on productivity.

A

High productivity:
- derivation (prefixation/suffixation)

  • compounding
  • conversion

Low(er) productivity:
- shortenings:
Clipping, blending, back-formation, alphabetism, acronymy
And other

44
Q

Give an example of back-formation word formation process.

A

Editor -> to edit

45
Q

Guidelines to distinguish a compound from a syntactic phrase

A
  • compounds usually have only one main Stress, namely on the first (or: left-hand) element (a Short story versus a short Story)
  • compounds do not allow modification of their first element (* a very Short story)
  • compounds are not fully compositional, that is, their meaning can not (as least not completely) be deduced from the meanings of their component parts. Thus, they show different degrees of (semantic) lexicalisation
46
Q

How are compounding and derivation linked historically?

A

These major word formation processes are linked by the fact that there are cases in which a formerly free morpheme has developed from the element of a compound into a derivational affix.

Well known examples:
-hood

47
Q

Give an example in ModE that reflect the history of English of synthetic to analytical lgs?

A

e.g.

s-genitive as counter example to grammaticalization

48
Q

What is the difference between derivation and inflection?

A

Derivation - new word class

Inflection - modification of word to express grammatical meaning
(Tense, aspect, case, number, gender, mood, voice, person, animacy, definiteness)

49
Q

What are some grammatical categories that can be modified via inflection?

A

Tense, aspect, case, voice, person, number, gender, mood, animacy and definiteness

50
Q

Why is the term ‚word‘ problematic in linguistic studies?

A
  • Phonetic contractions (is the form ‚I‘m‘ a word or two?)
  • Sequences of nouns
    — can be spelled as one unit (nutshell)
    — spelled with a hyphen (apple-pie)
    — spelled seperately (insurance broker)
  • Variable spellings (motorcar, motor-car, motor car)
51
Q

What word formation processes are there to change word class?

A
  • conversion
  • derivational endings (base was first)
  • backformation (editor - to edit)